Globalist piece of shit Sam Harris has deleted his twitter account.
(mobile.twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (81)
sorted by:
I never got the hype behind him or Peterson, (aside from Peterson saying don’t dictate my speech). Maybe it’s the delusional aspect of being an “atheist” or anti-theist but he never made solid arguments and came across more like Jon Stewart minus the ability to be funny.
I never liked Sam Harris at any point in time.
It was mainly arrogant atheists who masterbated over this pseudo-intellectual clown.
Peterson is a milquetoast self help guru. He has some good ideas but he is too much of a weak cuck thanks to his Canadian background.
The most chad argument that I heard him make was on why are females allowed to wear makeup in the workplace when it is designed to be sexual by it’s very nature. Though he never pressed the concept it was refreshing to see he was willing to call out some small form of female vanity.
Jordan Peterson's comments on how Kavanaugh should have dropped out after the fake allegations, his attacks on MGTOWs and his current retarded views that anonymous accounts should be banned on Twitter demonstrate why I don't have much respect for the Canadian.
Dont forget he wanted everyone to take the vax and agreed with lockdowns, until it was too late, then he rescinded.
Peterson was still mostly Blue Pilled back then. He could see some problems emerging but he still had faith in the systems and people running them, generally speaking.
Now, he's completely Red Pilled. He's apologised for some of his previous statements and I don't think it's a bad thing for someone to admit their failings.
He's also an extremely good clinical psychologist and his lectures on psychology are absolutely fantastic and incredibly insightful. Most of his lectures are available on youtube and other such places. I strongly recommend watching them. He is truly brilliant.
I've yet to know why people hype Peterson so much
even when I was a cringe le atheist, dawkings and chris hitchens were less cringe than this dude.
I agree about Sam and Peterson, but idk why throw all of Canada under the bus. Very small percentage of the country even voted for Trudeau, and there was the Trucker Convoy months ago.
Harris just wreaks of the kind of guy who would huff his own farts like he’s hyperventilating.
I do have to wonder what 2000s Sam Harris would make of 2020s Sam Harris. I can't help but think that 2000s Sam Harris would be quite disappointed in what he becomes.
I get the hype behind them both. The left. That's what is hyping them up, same as Shapiro. They're frauds, infiltrators, fake right. Propped up as opinion leaders by the media to defang and neuter the right.
Ben Shapiro is the definition of controlled opposition.
The little weasel was calling everyone who didn't want to take the shit covid vax dopes.
https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1336340877585707009
I've also never once met anyone who supported him in the slightest, outside broken clock comments and talking about his sister. Yet somehow he still gets massive talk and coverage.
His sister has nice tits.
Literally the only nice thing I can say about that weasel Ben Shapiro.
My experience is nobody likes him personally but he gets support because he's correct factually most of the time and has mild takes
Ben Shapiro has been largely unwavering in his criticism of the trans-trender mania in the Western world and for that he should receive some credence. Regardless of everything else, including his frothing-at-the-mouth support for Israel and using his podcast about American politics to endlessly yammer on about the rights of Israel. rofl
He's also since done a 180 on the COVID shot.
Sam Harris was just (and is) generally intelligent. The thing is that, as a Globalist, he can't see Trump as anything beyond purely evil, because Trump is resisting what he sees as an innate moral imperative of Globalism.
However, the appeal of the New Atheist movement at the time was that they were actually intelligent, articulate, and making reasonable arguments; compared to the Evangelicals who never made any good cultural arguments at all. There is a reason that Crocoduck, "the banana perfectly fits the hand", "tides go in, tides go out", "Pokemon are demonic", are all memes. The Evangelicals (for about 30 years) made appeals to authority as justification for anything they believed, pushed divine command theory as an ethical framework, and when they were forced to try and explain their own positions rationally they tended to take a bad faith approach. Although people have been saying, "The Evangelicals may have been right" about things, the problem is that: how the hell would anyone have known that? TentElephant is more informed on institutionalized sexual degeneration than the entire Evangelical movement combined. Had any Evangelical known who John Money was, they probably would have made more progress.
Peterson is a tipping point in that he's one of the first pro-Christian intellectuals, making good arguments, I've seen in the entirety of my life. Not only does he know about Cultural Marxism, he also happens to know why lots of Christian traditions work and can explain it. He was brought to a private Christian university to sit in on a panel discussion about religion in America, next to the head of the university as well as their leading academic on theology, and it was like he was talking to teenagers. They don't really know anything about why things are the way they are, why they believe what they do, or what is actually happening from the aggression of Fabian Socialism.
Contrast this with someone like Michael Knowles: who has a deep grasp of Theology, and Luke Avery: who has a deep grasp of the biblical metaphors and meanings. They are basically the only 'Christian Intellectuals' that I can think of without having to refer back to Kant, and the "intellectual" is being stretched to incredulity there. I've personally turned around quite a bit on Glenn Beck, but... the man is not an intellectual powerhouse.
Harris is a fucktard. A smart man would realize that only mutual respect keeps him from getting curbstomped and he wouldn't be so quick to piss on people
I think he's a smart man who is ideologically possessed by Trump Derangement Syndrome, due to the fact that he is embedded within Globalist structures.
Trump is an existential threat to him, because Trump is an existential threat to the powers that help to fund Sam, who is conditioned to accept their narratives.
You can't be smart and be a physically and mentally weak man antagonizing stronger men while also actively trying to tear down social barriers that keep you breathing
He may be intelligent but he's not smart
Peterson got famous in part do to that interview with Cathy Newman, he managed to intelligently articulate counter-arguments to feminist ideology to the point Cathy and feminism were proved to be just power hungry frauds. What he did wrong is not focusing on guys, in the beginning he used to defend that his work focused on young men like it was a bad thing, that was what kind of put me off a bit. In the end his work does help young men in society and hence the left hate him.
He got famous after that interview mostly because Cathy Newman is a blithering retard
She does not seem like a retard, even in the interview she was competent and well spoken. That is why the interview was such a success for Peterson.
So you're saying that the interview was a success for Peterson because she is a slightly-less-than-blithering retard?
IIRC, Peterson had already been on OG YT Rogan prior to the Newman interview.
The Newman interview made for great memes, but Peterson was already pretty well-known at that point.
I respected him when he left Patreon to support Sargon + others who were deplatformed for misinterpretations of things they said on other platforms.
But Trump nuked his brain.
Or maybe he just didn't want to pay the $8?