He's not entirely wrong, though. Most of the loudest male feminists have turned out to be guilty of sexual harassment of some sort. Not all of them, of course. But I would hazard a guess that the method they use to decry it could be very telling.
If he says: "We should not show any paedophilic content or sexualising of children", then fair enough.
But if he says: "We should not show any loli content because that gives people the desire to have sex with children", then I think it'd be worthwhile to look a bit closer at that person's behaviour and history.
I get it, it makes people uncomfortable. Peddling disgusting drawings of underage children is abhorrent and objectionable.
But, as anyone with a refractory period can tell you, there's nothing sexual going on during post-nut clarity.
If there was a way for pedophiles to all be clammed up in their own homes with their dicks in their hands instead of using it on kids, I would be in favor of that plan. Even better, it has zero cost in finding, jailing, or providing material. They figured that out themselves for free.
Because I care more about protecting real children than delicate sensibilities, the only sensible and responsible approach is to follow Japan's example to prevent real crime, not just on loli, not just on practically legalized prostitution, but also on rapefugees.
These statistics should be a disgrace to social policy. The true abhorrent and objectional fact is that there are thousands of kids that experience completely preventable physical and mental trauma.
I think you missed my point. Personally, I'm rather indifferent towards loli art/manga/content. It's everything about grooming and sexualising real children that I can't stand. That goes from everything to the horror stories of the experiences of young Disney stars, to "drag queen story time", to indoctrinating children into becoming politically-active with barely a shred of actual understanding of the issues involved, or to convincing them to permanently genitally mutilate themselves.
But back to the subject, my point was rather that the way people use to decry things often says a lot about the persons themselves. No brain is exactly the same; even identical twins can come to different conclusions when witnessing the same event. The only person whose way of thinking you'll ever really understand, is your own.
So when someone makes a generalized statement like: "Watching this cartoon gives people the desire to have sex with children", well, let's just say that it makes me raise my eyebrows.
Yep, anyone who complains about a thing is automatically guilty of it.
Refutation: Loli and shota is not real. Complaining exclusively about this while turning a blind eye to groomers and CP traders operating on 'public square' platforms with the support of the moderators is the hallmark of a pedophile.
The best way to fight pedophilia is to ignore it and/or support it.
Refutation: That's what twitter did all this time and that didn't work.
The fourth law of physics states such - anyone bitching about loli/shota is a pedophile.
Yep, anyone who complains about a thing is automatically guilty of it. The best way to fight pedophilia is to ignore it and/or support it.
This is you. This is how retarded you are.
He's not entirely wrong, though. Most of the loudest male feminists have turned out to be guilty of sexual harassment of some sort. Not all of them, of course. But I would hazard a guess that the method they use to decry it could be very telling.
If he says: "We should not show any paedophilic content or sexualising of children", then fair enough.
But if he says: "We should not show any loli content because that gives people the desire to have sex with children", then I think it'd be worthwhile to look a bit closer at that person's behaviour and history.
I get it, it makes people uncomfortable. Peddling disgusting drawings of underage children is abhorrent and objectionable.
But, as anyone with a refractory period can tell you, there's nothing sexual going on during post-nut clarity.
If there was a way for pedophiles to all be clammed up in their own homes with their dicks in their hands instead of using it on kids, I would be in favor of that plan. Even better, it has zero cost in finding, jailing, or providing material. They figured that out themselves for free.
Because I care more about protecting real children than delicate sensibilities, the only sensible and responsible approach is to follow Japan's example to prevent real crime, not just on loli, not just on practically legalized prostitution, but also on rapefugees.
These statistics should be a disgrace to social policy. The true abhorrent and objectional fact is that there are thousands of kids that experience completely preventable physical and mental trauma.
One can't help but notice the increase between 2004 and 2014. Almost like there was an invading army of rapists...
I think you missed my point. Personally, I'm rather indifferent towards loli art/manga/content. It's everything about grooming and sexualising real children that I can't stand. That goes from everything to the horror stories of the experiences of young Disney stars, to "drag queen story time", to indoctrinating children into becoming politically-active with barely a shred of actual understanding of the issues involved, or to convincing them to permanently genitally mutilate themselves.
But back to the subject, my point was rather that the way people use to decry things often says a lot about the persons themselves. No brain is exactly the same; even identical twins can come to different conclusions when witnessing the same event. The only person whose way of thinking you'll ever really understand, is your own.
So when someone makes a generalized statement like: "Watching this cartoon gives people the desire to have sex with children", well, let's just say that it makes me raise my eyebrows.
Lol @ the brown blobbies I wonder how the rate changes without them.
Yep. We even have a few threads here like this one of anti-anime male feminists getting exposed.
yes all of them
You're not fighting pedophilia by going after drawings.
Refutation: Loli and shota is not real. Complaining exclusively about this while turning a blind eye to groomers and CP traders operating on 'public square' platforms with the support of the moderators is the hallmark of a pedophile.
Refutation: That's what twitter did all this time and that didn't work.
Enjoy your mild myocarditis.