Judge Lisa B. Lench allowed prosecutors to call Gibson to the stand. She also denied a defense request that they be allowed to ask Gibson about racist and antisemitic statements he has made over the years
Team Women yet again, are we?
It's ridiculous that there even is a trial. The allegations are from a child raping pedophile, who herself avoided trial thanks to conveniently placed feminist allies refusing to take the case because of the likelihood that any accusations against her are just to derail #MeToo.
Does this mean as a white supremacist misogynist that non-whites and women can't testify against me because they might be willing to commit purgery against me?
Trials are supposed to be judged based on a jury of your peers. White men should not be judged by black women for example. Not should atheists be judging Christians etc... However modern degenerate egalitarian culture tries to pretend we're all peers but we aren't. The defendant has a good point, the problem is that they don't care about logical congruency.
That's if you view race as the only hierarchy that matters. What's that word leftists use.... Intersectionality. For me personally, I would only consider a white man with a similar background to me, who has a similar IQ to me, a similar career and life path, a similar community and beliefs/values as being my peer.
Just in case anyone thought Team Stormcuck and Team More Feminine Way aren't together...
Judge Lisa B. Lench allowed prosecutors to call Gibson to the stand. She also denied a defense request that they be allowed to ask Gibson about racist and antisemitic statements he has made over the years
Nazis <3 Women since 1933 when a disproportionate share of the female vote swept them into power.
Weinstein is innocent, the main accuser was a literal child rapist disowned by her own country.
I just find it interesting how the guy who was "cancelled for anti-semitism" is suddenly good enough of a witness when it serves women's goals.
Or maybe, get this idea. Not literally everything is weighed on a scale of "woman gain or loss." The world does have existence outside pure gender.
Black dudes like to eat food the same as white dudes. That doesn't make discussions on fried chicken an insidious plot by the blacks to make the whites fatter through unhealthy food.
A humiliation for women's credibility that they can never recover from.
You are actually retarded. Like painfully so. This setback will mean fucking nothing to them and they will successfully do the same method of attack in the future no matter the outcome. Weinstein getting out won't absolve the infinite number of other guys destroyed by MeToo. I still have dudes who'd jump me if we ran into each other, and the accuser openly admitted the entire story was false years ago.
Even then, him getting off just lets them say "The system doesn't care about women, it exists only to protect the rich powerful men" and they are even more powerful for it. His acquittal is better for them than his conviction.
For such a paranoid doomer, you live in the most bizarrely optimistic world of winners and losers.
We're literally talking about the guy who topped the MeToo cult's list of enemies. It's absolutely about women's power.
Even then, him getting off just lets them say "The system doesn't care about women, it exists only to protect the rich powerful men"
Nobody except their own people will believe in that, and nobody should give a shit what hate-filled conspiracy theory the modern Nazis are into now. I mean, these are the people who tried to take down some guy from the Food Network, failed and claimed the system doesn't value women's voices. They're not exactly...credible. They succeed through brainwashing the youth and sheer in-group rigidity, not through being good people.
They are starting to run out of credibility. We need a kill shot to it. I believe the original target of MeToo being acquitted is the kill shot. We need to create a situation where everyone picks a side, so the enemy outs themselves.
It would show that everything they've said is likely false if even their main case ended in defeat. That's why they stuck a female judge on it. Fucking rigged it like they do with everything else they're involved in.
Nobody except their own people will believe in that
Nobody should have believed them in the first place, and yet they did so here we are. We have thousands of years of history proving no one should believe them, yet people do on instinct every day.
They are starting to run out of credibility.
No they aren't. MeToo ran its course years ago when Biden had it killed, this is just the death gasps wrapping themselves up. False Rape Accusations (or just accusations in general) will never die because women always get the benefit of the doubt by instinct. And most people are not smart enough to question their instant emotional reactions.
It would show that everything they've said is likely false if even their main case ended in defeat.
No it wouldn't. It would just lionize them with a new belief that the system is completely worthless because it doesn't cater to them, with a new cause to martyr around. Majority of people think Weinstein is guilty, so now the majority of people could easily be led to the idea of how easy it is to get away with "rape" which benefits them into getting more laws passed and movements started to their further benefit.
You can still find Amber Heard defenders easily, and they are doing the same thing. They simply are losing because Johnny Depp makes old women horny enough to not unionize with the rest.
Weinstein isn't innocent. He just probably isn't guilty of what they imply that he is.
Being an icky guy who uses power to get sex = evil, disgusting, must be shunned from society.
Being an attractive young woman using sex to get access to what she wants = simultaneously empowering and a result of women's inherent victimhood and inability to truly consent ... to anything.
Pure fucking projection.
Team Women yet again, are we?
It's ridiculous that there even is a trial. The allegations are from a child raping pedophile, who herself avoided trial thanks to conveniently placed feminist allies refusing to take the case because of the likelihood that any accusations against her are just to derail #MeToo.
Does this mean as a white supremacist misogynist that non-whites and women can't testify against me because they might be willing to commit purgery against me?
Purgery -> Bleaching room in a sugar refinery.
Perjury -> Lie under oath.
Still love the sentence :)
Maybe this means Chauvin (who did nothing wrong) can get out on appeal!
Actually a fair point. Why should women be trusted to be honest about men, particularly men who share negative views of women...
Trials are supposed to be judged based on a jury of your peers. White men should not be judged by black women for example. Not should atheists be judging Christians etc... However modern degenerate egalitarian culture tries to pretend we're all peers but we aren't. The defendant has a good point, the problem is that they don't care about logical congruency.
But race rhetoric says white women are your peers because you're all white.
If I haven't committed a race crime, I'd rather have a black jury than a female one.
That's if you view race as the only hierarchy that matters. What's that word leftists use.... Intersectionality. For me personally, I would only consider a white man with a similar background to me, who has a similar IQ to me, a similar career and life path, a similar community and beliefs/values as being my peer.
But then you have ridiculously narrow requirements that will make finding a jury nearly impossible for some.
That's fair so perhaps we just leave it at same sex, race and citizenship status.
Sounds fair. It also prevents black groups' least favorite thing, an all white jury on a black person's case.
Everyone wins, except women, who will grind their teeth at not being able to restrict justice.
Take this coming from an open racist. Race rhetoric says no such thing.
Mel Gibson. The man who played not 1, not 2, not 3, but FOUR movies with David Glover as his co-star is a white-supremacist?
"you keep using that term.... I don't think you know what it means."
Early morning switched David for Danny.
"he noticed things your honor, and that's why my client should be allowed to rape everything he sees with his bizarre mutated genitals."
All Mel Gibson needs to say in response to this line of questioning is "well, I was right about this one, wasn't I?"
Just in case anyone thought Team Stormcuck and Team More Feminine Way aren't together...
Nazis <3 Women since 1933 when a disproportionate share of the female vote swept them into power.
Weinstein is innocent, the main accuser was a literal child rapist disowned by her own country.
This may surprise you, but everyone who doesn't agree with you on 100% of everything isn't part of the Feminist Mega Conspiracy.
In fact, given that Jewish women are probably the most insufferable of women I'd wager hating both is an option.
I just find it interesting how the guy who was "cancelled for anti-semitism" is suddenly good enough of a witness when it serves women's goals.
To me, that says that anti-semitism is forgivable if you serve the new/actual masters.
Don't be surprised if his career takes a huge turn upwards after he helps them.
I want a Weinstein acquittal. A humiliation for women's credibility that they can never recover from.
Or maybe, get this idea. Not literally everything is weighed on a scale of "woman gain or loss." The world does have existence outside pure gender.
Black dudes like to eat food the same as white dudes. That doesn't make discussions on fried chicken an insidious plot by the blacks to make the whites fatter through unhealthy food.
You are actually retarded. Like painfully so. This setback will mean fucking nothing to them and they will successfully do the same method of attack in the future no matter the outcome. Weinstein getting out won't absolve the infinite number of other guys destroyed by MeToo. I still have dudes who'd jump me if we ran into each other, and the accuser openly admitted the entire story was false years ago.
Even then, him getting off just lets them say "The system doesn't care about women, it exists only to protect the rich powerful men" and they are even more powerful for it. His acquittal is better for them than his conviction.
For such a paranoid doomer, you live in the most bizarrely optimistic world of winners and losers.
We're literally talking about the guy who topped the MeToo cult's list of enemies. It's absolutely about women's power.
Nobody except their own people will believe in that, and nobody should give a shit what hate-filled conspiracy theory the modern Nazis are into now. I mean, these are the people who tried to take down some guy from the Food Network, failed and claimed the system doesn't value women's voices. They're not exactly...credible. They succeed through brainwashing the youth and sheer in-group rigidity, not through being good people.
They are starting to run out of credibility. We need a kill shot to it. I believe the original target of MeToo being acquitted is the kill shot. We need to create a situation where everyone picks a side, so the enemy outs themselves.
It would show that everything they've said is likely false if even their main case ended in defeat. That's why they stuck a female judge on it. Fucking rigged it like they do with everything else they're involved in.
Nobody should have believed them in the first place, and yet they did so here we are. We have thousands of years of history proving no one should believe them, yet people do on instinct every day.
No they aren't. MeToo ran its course years ago when Biden had it killed, this is just the death gasps wrapping themselves up. False Rape Accusations (or just accusations in general) will never die because women always get the benefit of the doubt by instinct. And most people are not smart enough to question their instant emotional reactions.
No it wouldn't. It would just lionize them with a new belief that the system is completely worthless because it doesn't cater to them, with a new cause to martyr around. Majority of people think Weinstein is guilty, so now the majority of people could easily be led to the idea of how easy it is to get away with "rape" which benefits them into getting more laws passed and movements started to their further benefit.
You can still find Amber Heard defenders easily, and they are doing the same thing. They simply are losing because Johnny Depp makes old women horny enough to not unionize with the rest.
You just lost what little credibility you had
Asia Argento herself has more credible accusers.
Weinstein isn't innocent. He just probably isn't guilty of what they imply that he is.
Being an icky guy who uses power to get sex = evil, disgusting, must be shunned from society.
Being an attractive young woman using sex to get access to what she wants = simultaneously empowering and a result of women's inherent victimhood and inability to truly consent ... to anything.