Well, I'm convinced. Sandy Hook definitely happened the way the government says.
You can always be sure the government is telling the truth when they threaten everyone into believing them by singling out and destroying prominant non-believers on televised public humiliation rituals.
Oh fucking please. Holocause Denialists, like most idiots who deny atrocities, they are publicly humiliated mostly from their own actions making people find them utterly repulsive. Just like the few people who claimed 9/11 didn't happen shortly after the event, people get mad at them, and the anger can get exploited.
Alex Jones, on the other hand, has been treated more unfairly than most terrorists, let alone most Holocaust Deniers.
Bro, I think the Nazis killed them some Jews, but you are falling right into the trap. Everything must be available for question and suspicion, especially events on which the government bases authoritarian policy.
I never said they didn't. I said that Holocaust Deniers can't try to make this shit about them when people are just pissed at them.
There is a difference between: "shut the fuck up you actual Nazi, I don't want to hear your Hitler dindu speech" and "The law makes no exception to allow for Holocaust Denial".
In America, Holocaust has been completely allowed since it first started. People just don't want to hear Nazis deny atrocities.
that might seem like a reasonable position to take, but dig a little deeper and you'd realize that many people labelled as "holocaust deniers" just questioned some specific numbers and concepts. some did original research on the matter, some presented evidence to support their case. but pressure groups deliberately label any and all such cases as "holocaust deniers", to avoid any debate on the matter.
but why? even if (as I believe) most of the official narrative about the holocaust is correct, do you seriously think there are no accidental inaccuracies? no intentional fabrications? based on just what you've seen since 2020, do you really trust the official narrative, on anything?
take a step back and look what happened here. this is a thread about Alex Jones getting annihilated by a preposterous court decision, that was only possible because people simply accept the narrative of AJ being some great nondescript evil. why is he so bad? don't ask, don't care, he just is, now get me my guillotine. and in this very thread you just dismissed a large group of people who range from genuine scumbags to the simply curious to unpopular researchers who are operating in good faith, as "idiots who deny atrocities". that's something worth reflecting upon.
but dig a little deeper and you'd realize that many people labelled as "holocaust deniers" just questioned some specific numbers and concepts. some did original research on the matter, some presented evidence to support their case.
Are you talking about David Irving? He would be the only one who would fit this bill here. And yet he has an obvious agenda, which is the praise of Hitler and taking down of people like Churchill. You may want to read Evans' book on the trial.
even if (as I believe) most of the official narrative about the holocaust is correct
What exactly is the "official" narrative? As far as I know, there is no "official" narrative.
do you seriously think there are no accidental inaccuracies? no intentional fabrications? based on just what you've seen since 2020, do you really trust the official narrative, on anything?
It's been quite a long time. Fabricatons have come along and been exposed, like the Hitler Diaries and WIlkomirski. As for accidental inaccuracies. No one's called a denier by anyone serious who exposes such an accidental inaccuracy.
and in this very thread you just dismissed a large group of people who range from genuine scumbags to the simply curious to unpopular researchers who are operating in good faith, as "idiots who deny atrocities".
Do you have several of those unpopular researchers on hand? I think you grossly overestimate the good faith in which they operate. Irving is the best among them, but even he is nothing to write home about. (Obviously, he should not be prosecuted, let alone jailed, either.)
but dig a little deeper and you'd realize that many people labelled as "holocaust deniers" just questioned some specific numbers and concepts.
I'm afraid the vast majority of them didn't. That's precisely the problem.
There isn't anyone labeled a Holocaust Denier for thinking that the Soviet estimates of 4 million dead at Auschwitz were too high, including the Camp Commandant. No one is being labeled a Holocaust Denier for not saying that we don't have enough evidence to suggest that this site isn't the area of a mass grave, but this one is.
People are being labeled Holocaust Deniers because they are claiming the literal mountains of bodies were all fake, and the death camps were constructed by the Allies as part of a propaganda campaign, or that there was no genocidal program, despite physical and written evidence to the contrary, or that all the deaths were accountable to Teberculosis, or that Hitler actually had no problems with the Jews and tried to evacuate them to Madagascar because he was such a noble person, or that there aren't even mass graves related to the Holocaust, or that it was fake news since the 1910's, etc., etc.
I'm dismissing a large group of scumbags who are engaged in Nazi apologetics because most of them are Nazis, are Useful Idiots of Nazis, and the ones that aren't are just con men exploiting the Useful Idiots of Nazis for money. The Nazis themselves are well aware that exterminating the Jews is absolutely critical to National Socialism. The jews are considered a bourgeoisie that diluted the Aryan blood of Europe that will cause total civilizational collapse as Judeo-Capitalism funds Judeo-Bolshevist revolutions across Europe until all civilization is destroyed. That is precisely what they believe, and it is exactly why they advocate for the elimination of jews. Holocaust Denial is a bad-faith lie by people who think it was a good thing.
Holocaust Researchers are people who are actually doing research on the event itself, and have never been classified as denialists.
The biggest difference between them and Alex Jones is that Alex Jones is an admittedly confused man who has been bombarded by so much bullshit lies in his life, and has been gaslit for so long, that he thought there might be something to look into about it, and then realized that the actual denialists were just liars and con men.
when you realize jews killed a minimum of 60 million White Christians over the course of their death career they called the soviet union that little 6 bajillion number starts looking a bit fucking low anyway
all this fucking worry about the numbers, ooh the math, the 6 million pizzas with just the three ovens in the pizzeria, who the fuck cares?
did they deserve it? do they deserve it today? back then they genocided russians and tried to do the same to Germany with a luckily failed similar attempted revolution (but they did nonetheless succeed with making weimar a degenerate shithole). now you just look at all the shit they're pulling again now and ask yourself, do they deserve it?
unless you look at the fact that they are overrepresented by thousands of percents if not tens of thousands in every single position today that fucks shit up - media conglomerates, important government positions, bankers, CEOs/basically-CEO-board-members - and decide nahh... can't be good ol jews, the austrian man maybe shot a few so they're absolved of all sin. he was voted in to do it for no reason at all, even. none at all.
Lmao yeah, anyone who questions witness testimony like the literal holocoaster, or the masturbation machines, or the electrified floors that made bodies completely evaporate, or the dogs with poisoned teeth, get humiliated all the time, while the good goyim who believe this shit prove them wrong, definitely using actual arguments and not histrionic screeching and police.
Dude, none of these things exist in any official documentation of the holocaust. The only place where I've ever heard any of these claims is from the holocaust deniers that think that water reservoirs are swimming pools.
You can't just come up with this crazy shit and claim that you're being discriminated against because you're proposing a rational opposition to claims that aren't even repeated in any documentation, evidenciary record, or detailed analysis.
Your best argument is that you found someone that lied about their personal experience, that no one who knows anything about the subject takes seriously.
Well, I'm convinced. Sandy Hook definitely happened the way the government says.
You can always be sure the government is telling the truth when they threaten everyone into believing them by singling out and destroying prominant non-believers on televised public humiliation rituals.
Kinda like holocaust denial
Oh fucking please. Holocause Denialists, like most idiots who deny atrocities, they are publicly humiliated mostly from their own actions making people find them utterly repulsive. Just like the few people who claimed 9/11 didn't happen shortly after the event, people get mad at them, and the anger can get exploited.
Alex Jones, on the other hand, has been treated more unfairly than most terrorists, let alone most Holocaust Deniers.
Bro, I think the Nazis killed them some Jews, but you are falling right into the trap. Everything must be available for question and suspicion, especially events on which the government bases authoritarian policy.
Where did he hold the contrary?
I never said they didn't. I said that Holocaust Deniers can't try to make this shit about them when people are just pissed at them.
There is a difference between: "shut the fuck up you actual Nazi, I don't want to hear your Hitler dindu speech" and "The law makes no exception to allow for Holocaust Denial".
In America, Holocaust has been completely allowed since it first started. People just don't want to hear Nazis deny atrocities.
that might seem like a reasonable position to take, but dig a little deeper and you'd realize that many people labelled as "holocaust deniers" just questioned some specific numbers and concepts. some did original research on the matter, some presented evidence to support their case. but pressure groups deliberately label any and all such cases as "holocaust deniers", to avoid any debate on the matter.
but why? even if (as I believe) most of the official narrative about the holocaust is correct, do you seriously think there are no accidental inaccuracies? no intentional fabrications? based on just what you've seen since 2020, do you really trust the official narrative, on anything?
take a step back and look what happened here. this is a thread about Alex Jones getting annihilated by a preposterous court decision, that was only possible because people simply accept the narrative of AJ being some great nondescript evil. why is he so bad? don't ask, don't care, he just is, now get me my guillotine. and in this very thread you just dismissed a large group of people who range from genuine scumbags to the simply curious to unpopular researchers who are operating in good faith, as "idiots who deny atrocities". that's something worth reflecting upon.
Are you talking about David Irving? He would be the only one who would fit this bill here. And yet he has an obvious agenda, which is the praise of Hitler and taking down of people like Churchill. You may want to read Evans' book on the trial.
What exactly is the "official" narrative? As far as I know, there is no "official" narrative.
It's been quite a long time. Fabricatons have come along and been exposed, like the Hitler Diaries and WIlkomirski. As for accidental inaccuracies. No one's called a denier by anyone serious who exposes such an accidental inaccuracy.
Do you have several of those unpopular researchers on hand? I think you grossly overestimate the good faith in which they operate. Irving is the best among them, but even he is nothing to write home about. (Obviously, he should not be prosecuted, let alone jailed, either.)
I'm afraid the vast majority of them didn't. That's precisely the problem.
There isn't anyone labeled a Holocaust Denier for thinking that the Soviet estimates of 4 million dead at Auschwitz were too high, including the Camp Commandant. No one is being labeled a Holocaust Denier for not saying that we don't have enough evidence to suggest that this site isn't the area of a mass grave, but this one is.
People are being labeled Holocaust Deniers because they are claiming the literal mountains of bodies were all fake, and the death camps were constructed by the Allies as part of a propaganda campaign, or that there was no genocidal program, despite physical and written evidence to the contrary, or that all the deaths were accountable to Teberculosis, or that Hitler actually had no problems with the Jews and tried to evacuate them to Madagascar because he was such a noble person, or that there aren't even mass graves related to the Holocaust, or that it was fake news since the 1910's, etc., etc.
I'm dismissing a large group of scumbags who are engaged in Nazi apologetics because most of them are Nazis, are Useful Idiots of Nazis, and the ones that aren't are just con men exploiting the Useful Idiots of Nazis for money. The Nazis themselves are well aware that exterminating the Jews is absolutely critical to National Socialism. The jews are considered a bourgeoisie that diluted the Aryan blood of Europe that will cause total civilizational collapse as Judeo-Capitalism funds Judeo-Bolshevist revolutions across Europe until all civilization is destroyed. That is precisely what they believe, and it is exactly why they advocate for the elimination of jews. Holocaust Denial is a bad-faith lie by people who think it was a good thing.
Holocaust Researchers are people who are actually doing research on the event itself, and have never been classified as denialists.
The biggest difference between them and Alex Jones is that Alex Jones is an admittedly confused man who has been bombarded by so much bullshit lies in his life, and has been gaslit for so long, that he thought there might be something to look into about it, and then realized that the actual denialists were just liars and con men.
when you realize jews killed a minimum of 60 million White Christians over the course of their death career they called the soviet union that little 6 bajillion number starts looking a bit fucking low anyway
all this fucking worry about the numbers, ooh the math, the 6 million pizzas with just the three ovens in the pizzeria, who the fuck cares?
did they deserve it? do they deserve it today? back then they genocided russians and tried to do the same to Germany with a luckily failed similar attempted revolution (but they did nonetheless succeed with making weimar a degenerate shithole). now you just look at all the shit they're pulling again now and ask yourself, do they deserve it?
unless you look at the fact that they are overrepresented by thousands of percents if not tens of thousands in every single position today that fucks shit up - media conglomerates, important government positions, bankers, CEOs/basically-CEO-board-members - and decide nahh... can't be good ol jews, the austrian man maybe shot a few so they're absolved of all sin. he was voted in to do it for no reason at all, even. none at all.
Lmao yeah, anyone who questions witness testimony like the literal holocoaster, or the masturbation machines, or the electrified floors that made bodies completely evaporate, or the dogs with poisoned teeth, get humiliated all the time, while the good goyim who believe this shit prove them wrong, definitely using actual arguments and not histrionic screeching and police.
Dude, none of these things exist in any official documentation of the holocaust. The only place where I've ever heard any of these claims is from the holocaust deniers that think that water reservoirs are swimming pools.
You can't just come up with this crazy shit and claim that you're being discriminated against because you're proposing a rational opposition to claims that aren't even repeated in any documentation, evidenciary record, or detailed analysis.
Your best argument is that you found someone that lied about their personal experience, that no one who knows anything about the subject takes seriously.
It wasn´t the government who sued, it was the families of the dead children.
Ah yes all those strange not really grieving shifty looking families.
Who IIRC a significant (all?) proportion had ties to feds.
???