Sorry, but the court decision is a good thing. Canceling someone's talk (even when it is a miserable, pointless talk lie listening to Julie Bindel talking about "feminist campaigning against male violence") just because some random people start whining about their feelings being hurt is wrong. Full stop.
The only injustice in this is that I highly doubt that this will be used as a legal precedent to stop the UK police arresting people because they said mean words on Twitter. Which it should be, but I doubt the double standard is going away anytime soon.
If this doesn't set a precedent it's not a good thing, full stop. Feminists should be run out of town - unless they respect opposition voices with the same vigor that they demand their own voices be respected.
You were posting that same article as your silver bullet a while back. And now we can't trust that article because she is a "dirty liar", and instead have to rely on your mind-reading skills?
I say force feminism into the hell it created, men stop protecting women and let the trannies rape to their hearts content. This cuckservative need to protect women is just furthering the feminist ideologies that destroyed society.
I would remove the 'firing squad' part, as that may got you into trouble for calling for lawless violence. I get around that by saying that people will get to be executed after a fair trial, because that makes it clear that it is not lawless violence you are calling for.
As for the rest, Christ man, get it together. I mean, it's funny and all for you to go crazy, but this amount of obsession and hatred can't be good for you.
What your dumb ass doesn't understand is that what goes on in your delusional mind is no defense at all when the wording plainly contradicts your alleged intent.
What I'm telling you is that I'd slap you for that, and DoM is a good deal more strict with your dumb ass than I was or would be right now.
If you don't listen to reason, don't modify it then and count on your luck. Go get yourself banned. Bye.
Sorry, but the court decision is a good thing. Canceling someone's talk (even when it is a miserable, pointless talk lie listening to Julie Bindel talking about "feminist campaigning against male violence") just because some random people start whining about their feelings being hurt is wrong. Full stop.
The only injustice in this is that I highly doubt that this will be used as a legal precedent to stop the UK police arresting people because they said mean words on Twitter. Which it should be, but I doubt the double standard is going away anytime soon.
If this doesn't set a precedent it's not a good thing, full stop. Feminists should be run out of town - unless they respect opposition voices with the same vigor that they demand their own voices be respected.
Why does she say that it goes 'too far'?
You were posting that same article as your silver bullet a while back. And now we can't trust that article because she is a "dirty liar", and instead have to rely on your mind-reading skills?
I deny supporting The Manifesto!
RUN, IMPY!
Not the best way to spend your time, Impy.
Do me and all lovers of and explain on what grounds J.K. Rowling should be 'in jail'.
I thought you reached peak crazy when you said she hates her own son, but we can never misunderestimate your crazy.
Why are you crying?
Didn't you say that murdering men has been decriminalized in England, and that women are not held accountable for their crimes at all?
I know nothing of this case, so I can't contradict you, but I will note this as a prediction that she will not face prison.
What laws did Rowling push for that will lead to this woman not getting any prison time?
OK, so you support people being banned from libraries for opposing troonery?
And yet if they can be punished for pointing out that men are men, so can everyone else. You hate free speech.
Last time you made that claim about the UK, I challenged you to prove it, and you cited a case in... Ireland.
Have you managed to come up with an example in the meantime? No. You just hate women so much that you'll gladly sacrifice free speech.
The last thing we need is for you to be defeated in a debate by Julie Bindel, as surely you would be.
lol
Wait, I thought women commit DV because they hate men and want your dick dead. Why do they attack their own?
I say force feminism into the hell it created, men stop protecting women and let the trannies rape to their hearts content. This cuckservative need to protect women is just furthering the feminist ideologies that destroyed society.
I would remove the 'firing squad' part, as that may got you into trouble for calling for lawless violence. I get around that by saying that people will get to be executed after a fair trial, because that makes it clear that it is not lawless violence you are calling for.
As for the rest, Christ man, get it together. I mean, it's funny and all for you to go crazy, but this amount of obsession and hatred can't be good for you.
Suit yourself, but don't complain if you get banned again. It's just so boring here when you are.
BTW, plenty of extrajudicial ones.
Yeah, not even the worst feminist is as hate-filled and obsessed as you are.
And yet you claim that Sarah Everhard "deserved to be murdered".
Always wrong, but never in doubt.
It's not about the mention of firing squads, dummy, It's the suggestion of extralegal violence.
But suit yourself. If you're not even going to help yourself, why bother?
What your dumb ass doesn't understand is that what goes on in your delusional mind is no defense at all when the wording plainly contradicts your alleged intent.
What I'm telling you is that I'd slap you for that, and DoM is a good deal more strict with your dumb ass than I was or would be right now.
If you don't listen to reason, don't modify it then and count on your luck. Go get yourself banned. Bye.