- KotakuInAction2

()

posted 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 3 years ago by TheImpossible1 +10 / -0

52 comments

52 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (52)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Why are you crying?

Didn't you say that murdering men has been decriminalized in England, and that women are not held accountable for their crimes at all?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

▲ 3 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Because most likely, she won't face prison despite the overwhelming evidence against her,

I know nothing of this case, so I can't contradict you, but I will note this as a prediction that she will not face prison.

thanks to the laws pushed for by Rowling.

What laws did Rowling push for that will lead to this woman not getting any prison time?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

▲ 3 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Even Redditors, the most normie cucks on the Internet, are predicting two years suspended.

Does not seem warranted in this case. Nor have I seen any reference to your little obsession of "coercive control".

Coercive Control. Jesus Christ, do you even read what I write or do you just play the contrarian?

That's not the name of any law. Name the law and show me where Rowling was pushing for it.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?