FoX NeWs IS CoNSeRvaTiVe
(media.communities.win)
Comments (40)
sorted by:
they should not be allowed to do gender transition with or without the parents consent. No one should be allowed to . Child or adult.
If doctors are not allowed to chop off your arms if you 'feel' transabled, why should they be allowed to chop off your dick or breasts if you 'feel' another gender? Adult or not. It doesn't make much sense, in fact, it doesn't make any sense.
Because SCIENCE.
Because feminist women have demanded mass castration for over half a century.
The fact this is even a discussion shows how pedophilia has won year after year
Additionally, crossdressing with the intent to deceive should be outlawed.
No, see if you pretend to be a woman you deserve the same insane standards that women have. To quote a post I made earlier
Men= Perpetrator regardless
By the media's account of her retelling, the man would have needed to be a literal mind-reader to know she wasn't a willing participant.
Holy Lord, how do you discern between a woman who feigns enthusiasm because she's "scared you'll become aggressive" and a woman who feigns enthusiasm because she hopes you'll stuff her good? Never mind the possibility of genuine enthusiasm because she's into you...
And it should be a capital offense with vigilantism specifically legalized.
Tucker's good and the rest is not.
This is the same clinging factor every human faces with a corrupt service. Is the one worth the rest?
Tucker is the one media figure who speaks the truth. He's worth a world of foxes.
If you told me that one railroad track was empty, and another had one of my friends and all of my enemies tied to it, I'd be coming back to that lever, day after day, staring at it to try to make sense of my decision.
This is basically the universal suffrage problem: are some women based? Yes. Would we all be better off if no women could vote? Yes. Is it moral to deny them the vote on pragmatic grounds alone?
I'd say: one has only enemies, the other has enemies and one extremely influential, good friend. I know which I would pick.
Now I know a lot of people spin tales about what will happen. E.g. that suddenly a network with only Tuckers would rise if Fox were burned down by them. That is just fanciful.
Considering morality is a luxury that cannot be afforded. It's difficult enough to defeat the menace while only considering expediency. I'd argue that it's bad on pragmatic grounds, and pragmatic grounds alone - at least, announcing it beforehand (because that immediately alienates most women).
If it is true that women voting are to blame for the degeneration of Western civilization, it still does not follow that them not voting will solve the issue. Because in the meantime, everyone has gone to hell.
The bigger problem is that 'voting' doesn't seem to change anything. You get the same thing no matter who you 'vote' for.
Show me one good man, and I'll spare this city.
Sodom and Gomorrah beg to differ
Well I may have butchered the quote but you get the point. Let's get Tucker the hell out of there before Fox News is turned into salt.
One good man was worth saving, but two would have been worth saving the city for.
Most conservatives aren't "Conservative". They have decades of compromise under their belt and nary an example of conserving anything.
Gay marriage, sexual reproduction is the same as sodomy, the sexual “revolution” etc. “conservatives” have failed on every front to appease modern conveniences over biological demands
The conservative people -- not to be mistaken for so-called "conservative" Republicans -- opposed all of these things.
Gay marriage was passed by a Democrat-controlled Supreme Court and overrode the laws in many states that banned gay marriage (speaking of being "anti-democratic"). Unfortunately, the so called "conservative" Republicans thought this was a losing electoral issue so they didn't take a strong stand against the ruling. Most Republicans care more about their own elections than anything else, and could care less about conservative principles unless they think it will benefit them in some way.
The sexual revolution was opposed by conservatives at every turn, but young people think sex is exciting and fun and don't understand long-term consequences, so when they're constantly indoctrinated by the culture to engage in sexual hedonism, there's only so much conservatives can do. Even good parents often temporarily lose their kids to the culture once they enter high-school or college.
The problem is there are very few true conservatives in the Republican Party, and this has pretty much always been the case. Most politicians are unprincipled opportunists, and Republicans are no exception.
Two Virginia mothers weigh in... which is why Fox News can officially declare the state of Arizona for Joe Biden in the 2024 General Election.
People that aren’t legally allowed to vote or own guns are entirely capable of deciding their gender
The best they could argue under 2A is 16
Brb off to buy my niece a piece before she turns 10
Fox news has been trash for a few years now. Stop giving them views.
Which is why I archive everything or use pics
I've never watched them. They're annoying shits with barely right wing takes
Because if your "feeeeeeeeeeeeeeelings" are out of synch with biological reality, then the obvious solution is chopping off those body parts. LOGICS! <derp>
Factions within FoxNews were basically campaigning against Trump during the elections. That interview with what's his name who went over to CNN+ comes to mind. Pretty sure FoxNews was haemorrhaging viewers after the results of the 2020 elections came in and they started peddling the January 6 garbage. They also gave a show to that transexual Kardashian reject.
Factions of the Republican party were campaigning against Trump. I'm not surprised they exist at Fox News, too.
Also, speaking of Virginia...the feminist plant in the Heritage Foundation ended up working for Youngkin. Just in case you thought you could trust that guy.
I finally found the list of people who shared the Women's Suffrage Centennial Committee with the woman who ordered the Mar-a-Lago raid, and some have very interesting career trajectory.
Like when Fox News said the mother who castrated their child was correct because she knew her child wanted to transition since childhood
What is the balance point between good and intolerable evil?