I heard that MAPs don't actually like being called pedophiles, since they view it as being an ephebophile, which is someone who likes those between the ages of 10-14, and then there's the phebophiles who like those between the ages of 14 to 18.
Or maybe it's the other way around. I kinda zoned out with anger when it was told to me.
But y'know, when I did try listening to it get explained to me, it sounded just like fucking pedophilia.
The definition of ephebophilia is a bit retarded because it involves attraction to pubescent adolescents - which includes almost all straight men - but psychologists add "primarily or solely attracted to" to the definition to try to make it seem abnormal. Virtually all straight males are ephebophiles. Throughout the entirety of Western history until the 19th century this was considered completely normal (because it is), and still is considered normal in most other parts of the world.
Pedophiles, on the other hand, are sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children, which is abnormal, unnatural and obviously fucked up if they act upon that attraction.
IMO the campaign (probably by feminists) to demonise ephebophilia is one of the main enablers of the emasculation of Western men.
I nodded and said "oh that's very interesting" in reply to the pedophile's explanation of the key differences between ephebophilia, hebephilia and pedophilia, but honestly I was just trying to be polite. I couldn't hear a damn word he was saying over the roar of the woodchipper.
There is a place for that kind of categorization argument. It is in neuroscience circles since if there's a condition difference in the brain, different treatments may be needed to solve them, and solving issues at source is better than doing a case-by-case basis.
Outside that, "it's illegal, also, go seek professional help" should basically be the minimum and maximum conversation.
can't believe people are making videos coming out as pedos now, like there's nothing wrong with it. But hey, seems like the west is embracing pedophilia as "queer" now... that rotten civilization can't die quickly enough.
I love it, honestly. Accelerationism is the only way forward at this point and I'm bitter enough that Id be happy if every BLM/Feminist/vaxtard supporter was forced to give up their kids to these people. Its what they deserve and its the only way they'll learn
just a reminder: people like these who were just fired, tend to fail upwards.
they publicly badmouth the former employee on twitter, and there's tacit understanding for every potential employee reading, that these are still loyal soldiers for The Cause™.
so if your Cause is "accidentally" overlooking the sexualization of children on your platform, then these are prime candidates.
I heard that MAPs don't actually like being called pedophiles, since they view it as being an ephebophile, which is someone who likes those between the ages of 10-14, and then there's the phebophiles who like those between the ages of 14 to 18. Or maybe it's the other way around. I kinda zoned out with anger when it was told to me.
But y'know, when I did try listening to it get explained to me, it sounded just like fucking pedophilia.
The definition of ephebophilia is a bit retarded because it involves attraction to pubescent adolescents - which includes almost all straight men - but psychologists add "primarily or solely attracted to" to the definition to try to make it seem abnormal. Virtually all straight males are ephebophiles. Throughout the entirety of Western history until the 19th century this was considered completely normal (because it is), and still is considered normal in most other parts of the world.
Pedophiles, on the other hand, are sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children, which is abnormal, unnatural and obviously fucked up if they act upon that attraction.
IMO the campaign (probably by feminists) to demonise ephebophilia is one of the main enablers of the emasculation of Western men.
Now ask yourself this: How do you reliably blackmail people in positions of power if most people are decent and reasonable in ordinary circumstances?
I give up - how?
Criminalize ordinary behaviour.
I nodded and said "oh that's very interesting" in reply to the pedophile's explanation of the key differences between ephebophilia, hebephilia and pedophilia, but honestly I was just trying to be polite. I couldn't hear a damn word he was saying over the roar of the woodchipper.
"MAPs" are pedos.
They hide behind the "it includes being attracted to 16 yo!" ( not pedophilia ) to get guillible people to lower their defenses.
People who aren't sex pests would never touch sexually or rape someone without their consent. The non-rapist pedos you will never know about them.
The rapist pedos will proclaim to be "virtuous no-contact MAPs" to pity-trip people into tolerating them, then gain access to children. And rape them.
There is a place for that kind of categorization argument. It is in neuroscience circles since if there's a condition difference in the brain, different treatments may be needed to solve them, and solving issues at source is better than doing a case-by-case basis.
Outside that, "it's illegal, also, go seek professional help" should basically be the minimum and maximum conversation.
You didn't actually read the rest of what I wrote, did you?
The last line was the key takeaway.
I love it, honestly. Accelerationism is the only way forward at this point and I'm bitter enough that Id be happy if every BLM/Feminist/vaxtard supporter was forced to give up their kids to these people. Its what they deserve and its the only way they'll learn
just a reminder: people like these who were just fired, tend to fail upwards.
they publicly badmouth the former employee on twitter, and there's tacit understanding for every potential employee reading, that these are still loyal soldiers for The Cause™.
so if your Cause is "accidentally" overlooking the sexualization of children on your platform, then these are prime candidates.
Pedtreon