A quick point of order: I marked this as NSFW just for the content of the video. But anything overtly lewd was censored because Youtube gonna Youtube. So there isnt anything particularly outrageous presented in the video.
As for the actual content of the video:
A female scientist looked into what men find attractive, but using as many input neutral sources as possible such as art, sculptures, and sex dolls to control for both the personalities of the women in question, as well as ensure people cant lie to try and give answers they think people want to hear (for instance, they bring up a statistic that if Women know their results are being questioned, they will admit to having less sexual partners than if you just asked them).
The TLDR of the results are as follows:
When it comes to the "boobs or ass?" question, the answer is "Yes, but as long as they are big. But not too big." (apparently, overly large boobs are a bigger turn off than flat chest. But we are talking "Anime boobs" proportions for "too large")
Men do indeed like women to have larger thighs, and anyone who says otherwise is lying.
There is no such thing as a wrong proportion of waist-hip or waist-bust. Men will always find that hot unless its extreme.
Men overwhelmingly prefer long hair over short hair (which I guess makes me a unique one, since I like both).
There is a reason the hands on hip "seductress" pose is so popular. It is very good at getting mens attention.
As if it wasnt obvious, men are not very fond of overweight women (but not by a wide margin), and they hate obese women.
The reason that models and fashion industry groups dont follow any of the above rules anymore is that they only advertise to women (who seem to do a bad job at deciding what men find attractive), and even more than that they are advertising to a very particular kind of woman. Usually more Feminist minded and more Modern Urban minded than normal women.
It's really dumb we have to constantly repeat this when we have literal paintings that last centuries like the one of Venus in the shell to tell women what we find hot.
In 2017 I had to show some retarded femoid ancient fertility statues from 30,000 BC which looked like piles of ovoids stacked on top of eachother simulating massive breasts, a pregnant belly, and a big badonka donk butt. It's a human rights violation that whenever I go online I am inadvertently exposed to the opinions of 14 year olds, women, and niggers, because they're somehow everywhere now and they won't shut the fuck up.
(who seem to do a bad job at deciding what men find attractive)
No, they are well aware of what men find attractive. They are coping and seething because they know they themselves don't fit into what is ostensibly an extremely wide and forgiving range of body types.
One thing it didn’t mention: body and facial hair…
Fuck the modern trend of women with unshaven moustachios and underarms, or, almost as bad, arms and legs… 🤮
Particularly those with darker-colored hair, so you can actually see it all…
Fucking disgusting trend…
Oh, and piercings. Fuck piercings, anywhere other than the ears, and, arguably, the side of the nose/perhaps the belly button, if it’s small enough (still unhygienic, though), and fuck most large tattoos, too…
Unless you’re Polynesian or whatever, most tattoos that you can’t cover up look like utter shit, and face/neck tattoos always look bad, male OR female, regardless of background, lol…
It's very easy to see this by observing women who have a financial incentive to be attractive. Long hair and 20-ish BMI are the standard anywhere extracting cash from men is the goal.
"Beauty" is an interesting concept. i think we all agree that hippos are kinda ugly, blubbering and unmagestic. I think we all agree cats are cute, slender and graceful. Thus, these animals/attributes are compared to women. Fat women are like hippos. Atheletic/fit/slim women are like cats.
People like symmetry, smoothness and neatness (ie... a nice, smooth, glossy, phone). People dont like lumpy, hairy, wrinkly things (ie.. a moldy peach).
A quick point of order: I marked this as NSFW just for the content of the video. But anything overtly lewd was censored because Youtube gonna Youtube. So there isnt anything particularly outrageous presented in the video.
As for the actual content of the video:
A female scientist looked into what men find attractive, but using as many input neutral sources as possible such as art, sculptures, and sex dolls to control for both the personalities of the women in question, as well as ensure people cant lie to try and give answers they think people want to hear (for instance, they bring up a statistic that if Women know their results are being questioned, they will admit to having less sexual partners than if you just asked them).
The TLDR of the results are as follows:
When it comes to the "boobs or ass?" question, the answer is "Yes, but as long as they are big. But not too big." (apparently, overly large boobs are a bigger turn off than flat chest. But we are talking "Anime boobs" proportions for "too large")
Men do indeed like women to have larger thighs, and anyone who says otherwise is lying.
There is no such thing as a wrong proportion of waist-hip or waist-bust. Men will always find that hot unless its extreme.
Men overwhelmingly prefer long hair over short hair (which I guess makes me a unique one, since I like both).
There is a reason the hands on hip "seductress" pose is so popular. It is very good at getting mens attention.
As if it wasnt obvious, men are not very fond of overweight women (but not by a wide margin), and they hate obese women.
The reason that models and fashion industry groups dont follow any of the above rules anymore is that they only advertise to women (who seem to do a bad job at deciding what men find attractive), and even more than that they are advertising to a very particular kind of woman. Usually more Feminist minded and more Modern Urban minded than normal women.
It's really dumb we have to constantly repeat this when we have literal paintings that last centuries like the one of Venus in the shell to tell women what we find hot.
In 2017 I had to show some retarded femoid ancient fertility statues from 30,000 BC which looked like piles of ovoids stacked on top of eachother simulating massive breasts, a pregnant belly, and a big badonka donk butt. It's a human rights violation that whenever I go online I am inadvertently exposed to the opinions of 14 year olds, women, and niggers, because they're somehow everywhere now and they won't shut the fuck up.
Bots. Bots everywhere, lol…
Well, maybe not everywhere, but that’s certainly some of it…
Venus of Willendorf gang rise up!
No, they are well aware of what men find attractive. They are coping and seething because they know they themselves don't fit into what is ostensibly an extremely wide and forgiving range of body types.
One thing it didn’t mention: body and facial hair…
Fuck the modern trend of women with unshaven moustachios and underarms, or, almost as bad, arms and legs… 🤮
Particularly those with darker-colored hair, so you can actually see it all…
Fucking disgusting trend…
Oh, and piercings. Fuck piercings, anywhere other than the ears, and, arguably, the side of the nose/perhaps the belly button, if it’s small enough (still unhygienic, though), and fuck most large tattoos, too…
Unless you’re Polynesian or whatever, most tattoos that you can’t cover up look like utter shit, and face/neck tattoos always look bad, male OR female, regardless of background, lol…
Vomits
Thanks for prompting a traumatic flashback.
A few years back I dated an artist, a real bohemian type, and when we got naked I discovered her unshaven, stinking armpits. She was proud of it.
Had to use steely zen mind control to avoid gagging but managed to . . . uh . . . get the job done.
where can the results be found?
Here is the link to the actual article they were using as the basis.
Make breasts or butt or anything too big and they just look fat.
To be clear, we're talking about female boobs, right?
right?
Large breast got that tube sock shape lol. Its meh. If its not perky, nope.
It's very easy to see this by observing women who have a financial incentive to be attractive. Long hair and 20-ish BMI are the standard anywhere extracting cash from men is the goal.
"Beauty" is an interesting concept. i think we all agree that hippos are kinda ugly, blubbering and unmagestic. I think we all agree cats are cute, slender and graceful. Thus, these animals/attributes are compared to women. Fat women are like hippos. Atheletic/fit/slim women are like cats.
People like symmetry, smoothness and neatness (ie... a nice, smooth, glossy, phone). People dont like lumpy, hairy, wrinkly things (ie.. a moldy peach).