The only reason Khan addressed the matter at all is because he wanted to virtue signal and show his loyalty to the cause.
His reponse is there purely to demonstrate that he will serve the revolutionaries even when he knows everything to be a lie.
This vile subversive wants you dead, and he wants to conquer your nation with marxist ideology. If the feeling isn't mutual at this point, it ought to be. No quarter for communists.
You poison discourse, you're bad faith and nobody should engage with you in a meaningful manner.
For the sake of argument, let's take this for granted. Andy Ngo is a bad faith actor. In fact, he's the bad faithiest of the bad faith actors.
If you're a reporter and have the slightest bit of journalistic integrity, the fact that someone who has been swatted has called for others to be swatted in the past should interest you immensely. How could you not want to know at the very least if their experience has changed their mind?
I'm not talking about saying "you wanted someone else to be swatted so you deserve it." I'm talking about the most basic level of interest in knowing how this person's perception of swatting and its justification has changed.
Whether you like it or not, Ahmar, your total lack of interest in this angle reflects badly on you. Whether Andy Ngo is a bad person or not has no bearing on that.
Around time, a source told the Portland Mercury that Ngo and Patriot Prayer, a Proud Boys spin-off/chapter, have an “understanding” that the group offers him protection when he covers rallies in exchange for favorable coverage
Oh, well, if "a source" said that then it must be true...
Is Keffals the one who was offering to send chemical castration drugs to children? If so, how is it possible to "swat" someone who is openly boasting about committing a crime?
Wow, internet faggots do internet drama. Who would've thought?
I have no idea who these people are, except for NGO, who's a faggots with a taste for the spotlight.
Go fishing, go get some work done, go work out, go watch some fucking reruns of I love Lucy, but for fuck's sake don't get hung up on faggy Twitter drama.
The only reason Khan addressed the matter at all is because he wanted to virtue signal and show his loyalty to the cause.
His reponse is there purely to demonstrate that he will serve the revolutionaries even when he knows everything to be a lie.
This vile subversive wants you dead, and he wants to conquer your nation with marxist ideology. If the feeling isn't mutual at this point, it ought to be. No quarter for communists.
That's what I was thinking.
I've never of Ahmar Khan before.
I assume this nobody is trying to raise his own profile by being mean to antifa's enemy #1.
I expected this article to be about Rachel Gilmore, Global's Tiktok Reporter, after reading the title.
She's been on a roll recently posting inflammatory and defamatory stuff.
She's also making up fake BS about being harassed like Taylor Lorenz after making up pure BS and posting it nationally.
For the sake of argument, let's take this for granted. Andy Ngo is a bad faith actor. In fact, he's the bad faithiest of the bad faith actors.
If you're a reporter and have the slightest bit of journalistic integrity, the fact that someone who has been swatted has called for others to be swatted in the past should interest you immensely. How could you not want to know at the very least if their experience has changed their mind?
I'm not talking about saying "you wanted someone else to be swatted so you deserve it." I'm talking about the most basic level of interest in knowing how this person's perception of swatting and its justification has changed.
Whether you like it or not, Ahmar, your total lack of interest in this angle reflects badly on you. Whether Andy Ngo is a bad person or not has no bearing on that.
Archive of his unprofessional tweets: https://archive.ph/ILHXI
Also called Ngo and People's Party of Canada leader Maxime Bernier "dweebs". So much objective journalisming: https://archive.ph/T6vhI
Here's our totally real journalist celebrating someone he doesn't like (Andrew Tate) being censored: https://archive.ph/B2Lyt
Here he is citing the far-left SPLC, which has paid millions of dollars in defamation penalties: https://archive.ph/yUMwo
put that disgusting freak in a padded room.
just put him in a really tiny room made of pine boards.
Possibly the only true sentence this street shitter ever wrote, hehehe
Probably not being hyperbolic, either. These freaks always have weird skeletons in their closets
Oh, well, if "a source" said that then it must be true...
Was that source antifa?
Is Keffals the one who was offering to send chemical castration drugs to children? If so, how is it possible to "swat" someone who is openly boasting about committing a crime?
"The one"? No.
"One of those"? Yes.
Tons of drama recently happening with kiwifarms.
Wow, internet faggots do internet drama. Who would've thought?
I have no idea who these people are, except for NGO, who's a faggots with a taste for the spotlight.
Go fishing, go get some work done, go work out, go watch some fucking reruns of I love Lucy, but for fuck's sake don't get hung up on faggy Twitter drama.