This might be your dumbest take so far. You don't have to support every tyrannical thing Israel does just to "own the stormfags". We don't have to ban all loans but setting reasonable limits would go a long way. As for banning cash, the eventual goal is a digital cryptocurrency with no privacy that the government can expire at any time to stop inflation. (or eliminate dissent) We need to fight against that.
it is almost as if a community that wants the best for itself could and should put together money to prop up people and ideas that seem promising for said community
i know you are a retarded faggot (two exception words i understand i can use) so you think this literally means everyone should get money all the time from everyone, but it does not mean that
Realistically, it would be much harder to get loans if there was no gain for the lender.
Low interest loans entered into by mutual consent are reasonable. Lending to someone incurs a risk and the opportunity cost of not having that money while it's being borrowed.
It's wonderful when people band together to do selfless things, but quid pro quo isn't inherently immoral. Mutual interest makes the world go round, same as it ever has.
Bad credit score, I'm guessing?
You're not entitled to loans without conditions.
This might be your dumbest take so far. You don't have to support every tyrannical thing Israel does just to "own the stormfags". We don't have to ban all loans but setting reasonable limits would go a long way. As for banning cash, the eventual goal is a digital cryptocurrency with no privacy that the government can expire at any time to stop inflation. (or eliminate dissent) We need to fight against that.
Usury is a sin. Allahu a'alam.
Oh, THAT’s why you don’t like it.
Allah knows best.
Islam is right about women. And gays. And money.
Oh, you mean God? Then yes I agree.
I like the Islamic approach to lending where it's structured as a mutual investment.
Higher than yours.
And loans shouldn't exist, in their present form anyway.
Why would people loan money with no gain from doing so?
Before you say "they can borrow from family" - what about people who don't have living family?
it is almost as if a community that wants the best for itself could and should put together money to prop up people and ideas that seem promising for said community
i know you are a retarded faggot (two exception words i understand i can use) so you think this literally means everyone should get money all the time from everyone, but it does not mean that
I'd prefer not to turn the whole world into a giant popularity contest just to "own the Jews".
This says so much about your moral framework.
Realistically, it would be much harder to get loans if there was no gain for the lender.
Low interest loans entered into by mutual consent are reasonable. Lending to someone incurs a risk and the opportunity cost of not having that money while it's being borrowed.
It's wonderful when people band together to do selfless things, but quid pro quo isn't inherently immoral. Mutual interest makes the world go round, same as it ever has.
Okay, give me $60, you don't know me but I'll promise to pay it back.
You see how ridiculous that is? That's why banks exist.