it is almost as if a community that wants the best for itself could and should put together money to prop up people and ideas that seem promising for said community
i know you are a retarded faggot (two exception words i understand i can use) so you think this literally means everyone should get money all the time from everyone, but it does not mean that
see? you assume a premise of dishonesty to begin with
... and you want that for finance? You're insane.
The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again.
it is almost as if a community that wants the best for itself could and should put together money to prop up people and ideas that seem promising for said community
i know you are a retarded faggot (two exception words i understand i can use) so you think this literally means everyone should get money all the time from everyone, but it does not mean that
I'd prefer not to turn the whole world into a giant popularity contest just to "own the Jews".
see? you assume a premise of dishonesty to begin with - the people and ideas will always be fake, always be liars, always be manipulative
only a thief fears thieves
I mean, you know how I feel about a significant quantity of the population.
Look what judging things based on popularity has got most people in politics, and you want that for finance? You're insane.
The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again.