I think it will be harder in that cases and Whites are safer in a way because they are becoming Asian countries without significant Black populations. This kind of rhetoric will be harder to sell.
None. It was the actions of a multitude of humans, not gods, mainly white British ones, that led to any level of weakening of the practice of slavery directly, combined with advances in technology that made using slaves a financially inferior model for anything except sexual services (and the only reason that one isn't being undermined by superior technology is puritanism keeping product development slower).
Your grandstanding would make more sense in a Christian vs Paganistic or Islamic debate, since the one allows for the concept of no slaves versus the other two which have it entwined within their cultural cores.
conquered people were treated much more harshly than they were by the Christian nations that conquered much of the world
For a truly fair comparison we should check what happened with the descendants of slaves that were sent/sold Eastwards while the others went West to the Americas. You know, the ones who were gelded so they couldn't reprodu- oh.
They need to get rid of this cunt and replace him with a hardline catholic. Someone from the old school Irish days, is there anyone left from when they shoved Sinead O'Connor's ass in the Irish laundries?
And Australians and New Zealanders and Europeans.
The end goal is for there to be no majority white nations - unless you consider Israelis white.
🌎👩🚀🔫👩🚀
I think it will be harder in that cases and Whites are safer in a way because they are becoming Asian countries without significant Black populations. This kind of rhetoric will be harder to sell.
This is how you make white nationalists. Keep it up.
Let's say Pope Francis acquiesces and "rescinds the doctrine".
How does that expropriate Canadians and Americans exactly ?
This post title is pretty cringey.
Because it is the beginning of the process "your land titles are not legit".
The land titles are not dictated by the Vatican though.
If the Queen was asked to "rescind the doctrine", maybe you'd have slightly a point ? I think you're confused.
In the 60's some could argue that some shaddy French postmodern philosophers wouldn't make a fuse at the mainstream US culture and here we are...
You think Macron has any say in what goes on in Texas ?
I think he means Foucault so... yes.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the doctrine of the "natives" was whoever has the pointiest sticks owns the place. And thus it was.
They'll have a better chance of not getting conquered next time if they invent useful things like the wheel and a written language.
i'm actually sorry they were, because now i have to deal with it.
Let’s debunk “modern” atheism in 4 words. What religion ended slavery
None. It was the actions of a multitude of humans, not gods, mainly white British ones, that led to any level of weakening of the practice of slavery directly, combined with advances in technology that made using slaves a financially inferior model for anything except sexual services (and the only reason that one isn't being undermined by superior technology is puritanism keeping product development slower).
Your grandstanding would make more sense in a Christian vs Paganistic or Islamic debate, since the one allows for the concept of no slaves versus the other two which have it entwined within their cultural cores.
Shut up IGN.
For a truly fair comparison we should check what happened with the descendants of slaves that were sent/sold Eastwards while the others went West to the Americas. You know, the ones who were gelded so they couldn't reprodu- oh.
They need to get rid of this cunt and replace him with a hardline catholic. Someone from the old school Irish days, is there anyone left from when they shoved Sinead O'Connor's ass in the Irish laundries?