Same as being colorblind, it did not work.
Second we all know that women have huge ingroup bias so the more women move in to power the more privilege they will have regardless of the law. Proving discrimination is not as easy as you may think and to many women are already in power, no matter what you do being a women has privileges.
Thing is women are doing what they thought men were doing all along, but that is beside the point of the thread.
The more pertinent argument than cultural backlash is the free market will demolish those companies in no time flat.
The only place where women out-perform men is Silicone Valley. Anywhere else, and they'd be firing their most efficient, most productive, and most dedicated employees.
I don't see any logic that says I'm incorrect in that. The fact that girls actually believe that crap and want to be men just proves me more correct.
Of course, you're always 'more correct' when you can make assertions with no evidence. I could as easily make the precise opposite claim. That's beside the point though. Your little texts specifies certain conditions under which group A will not try to 'emulate' group B. But the present situation disproves your analysis.
And yes, I wrote it myself. Why is it crazy to remove the legal privilege of being a certain gender?
It's a cute text. But you make everything sound crazy. Everything has an undertone of rage and hatred. You could be more effective if you were a happy warrior and had a minimal understanding of theory of mind.
Remember when I told you that instead of attacking me for what YOU don't like (alleged support for TERFs), you should be attacking me for what people here don't like (being pro-choice)? That's a trifle, of course, but it's symptomatic of a bigger issue with you.
Allying with TERFs is worth it to save kids but putting a metaphorical hammer through women's pedestal isn't?
You can fix the world in your fantasy, in a childish "if I were king". But I operate in the real world.
If you did this, they'd just start discriminating against men.
Way to score in your own goal there idiot.
If you haven't understood yet, you never will : Men protecting Women is a biological imperative. It takes multiple women to keep the human race going, it takes way less men. That's just how Nature is. It's why men hunted and why women picked fruit.
In this age of individualism, where people have been persuaded that they can be whatever they want to be, biology is too much for people to stomach. They hate you for telling the truth.
I will say this though. The cause for those privileges having ceased, the effects should also cease. If women aren't going to have kids, but instead going to act like men, those should lose the privileges. Sort of like French nobles losing their noble status if they engaged in commerce.
Just not wanting to have kids doesn't fix 300,000 years of evolution. Women have been bred and evolved to be weaker physically because they have been sidelined all this time to protect the child bearing capabilities of the species.
You can't change that with 2 generations. Men and Women are biologically different. That is rooted in one of the sex being the child bearing sex.
Which would prove me right and destroy the good woman argument permanently.
No, you don't get it.
MEN would start discriminating against MEN. It wouldn't destroy shit about the "Good woman" (since you know, that's just reality) and it would leave your Incel freak ass alone and starving.
It would however prove the women right : They are being used as slave labour to keep wages artificially low.
Why would businesses want workers that are too focused on spewing hate to do their jobs?
Having actually worked and interacted with women, you'd be surprised to know that they don't in fact, spew hate. But that again would require you to actually not be a basement dwelling coomer.
Same as being colorblind, it did not work. Second we all know that women have huge ingroup bias so the more women move in to power the more privilege they will have regardless of the law. Proving discrimination is not as easy as you may think and to many women are already in power, no matter what you do being a women has privileges.
Thing is women are doing what they thought men were doing all along, but that is beside the point of the thread.
Should it be legal to fire men en masse?
As you well know, that would not work. Even in the present situation, there's no one who agrees with you, despite the egregious stuff going on.
The more pertinent argument than cultural backlash is the free market will demolish those companies in no time flat.
The only place where women out-perform men is Silicone Valley. Anywhere else, and they'd be firing their most efficient, most productive, and most dedicated employees.
Well, can't argue with crazy, but I can just point out that people don't go around hating half the human population, except for you and feminists.
This removes $0 from the fortunes of the plutocrats pushing trans ideology so it would fail to settle anything,
They don't want fairness.
Which is why there are no women who pretend to be male. OH WAIT!
Did you write this yourself? Or did you finally find someone who believes the same crazy things you do?
Of course, you're always 'more correct' when you can make assertions with no evidence. I could as easily make the precise opposite claim. That's beside the point though. Your little texts specifies certain conditions under which group A will not try to 'emulate' group B. But the present situation disproves your analysis.
It's a cute text. But you make everything sound crazy. Everything has an undertone of rage and hatred. You could be more effective if you were a happy warrior and had a minimal understanding of theory of mind.
Remember when I told you that instead of attacking me for what YOU don't like (alleged support for TERFs), you should be attacking me for what people here don't like (being pro-choice)? That's a trifle, of course, but it's symptomatic of a bigger issue with you.
You can fix the world in your fantasy, in a childish "if I were king". But I operate in the real world.
non-dysphoric trannies are mostly in it for the fetish. They routinely dismiss and scorn actual women.
If you did this, they'd just start discriminating against men.
Way to score in your own goal there idiot.
If you haven't understood yet, you never will : Men protecting Women is a biological imperative. It takes multiple women to keep the human race going, it takes way less men. That's just how Nature is. It's why men hunted and why women picked fruit.
In this age of individualism, where people have been persuaded that they can be whatever they want to be, biology is too much for people to stomach. They hate you for telling the truth.
I will say this though. The cause for those privileges having ceased, the effects should also cease. If women aren't going to have kids, but instead going to act like men, those should lose the privileges. Sort of like French nobles losing their noble status if they engaged in commerce.
This is sort of the entire point of traditional marriage. Women who bear children get special status (Mrs) and physical protection beyond the law.
It all comes back to the destruction of the family which we can, quite accurately, blame on feminism.
Just not wanting to have kids doesn't fix 300,000 years of evolution. Women have been bred and evolved to be weaker physically because they have been sidelined all this time to protect the child bearing capabilities of the species.
You can't change that with 2 generations. Men and Women are biologically different. That is rooted in one of the sex being the child bearing sex.
I, too, think we need easier access to guns.
No, you don't get it.
MEN would start discriminating against MEN. It wouldn't destroy shit about the "Good woman" (since you know, that's just reality) and it would leave your Incel freak ass alone and starving.
It would however prove the women right : They are being used as slave labour to keep wages artificially low.
Is your mother a good woman, or is she an evil witch like the rest of 'em?
Having actually worked and interacted with women, you'd be surprised to know that they don't in fact, spew hate. But that again would require you to actually not be a basement dwelling coomer.
Tell me you've never actually worked at all, much less with women, without telling me.
99.9% of the population doesn't give a shit and doesn't spew "hate" (you define hate like leftist do you dumbass).