If you did this, they'd just start discriminating against men.
Way to score in your own goal there idiot.
If you haven't understood yet, you never will : Men protecting Women is a biological imperative. It takes multiple women to keep the human race going, it takes way less men. That's just how Nature is. It's why men hunted and why women picked fruit.
In this age of individualism, where people have been persuaded that they can be whatever they want to be, biology is too much for people to stomach. They hate you for telling the truth.
I will say this though. The cause for those privileges having ceased, the effects should also cease. If women aren't going to have kids, but instead going to act like men, those should lose the privileges. Sort of like French nobles losing their noble status if they engaged in commerce.
Just not wanting to have kids doesn't fix 300,000 years of evolution. Women have been bred and evolved to be weaker physically because they have been sidelined all this time to protect the child bearing capabilities of the species.
You can't change that with 2 generations. Men and Women are biologically different. That is rooted in one of the sex being the child bearing sex.
Which would prove me right and destroy the good woman argument permanently.
No, you don't get it.
MEN would start discriminating against MEN. It wouldn't destroy shit about the "Good woman" (since you know, that's just reality) and it would leave your Incel freak ass alone and starving.
It would however prove the women right : They are being used as slave labour to keep wages artificially low.
Why would businesses want workers that are too focused on spewing hate to do their jobs?
Having actually worked and interacted with women, you'd be surprised to know that they don't in fact, spew hate. But that again would require you to actually not be a basement dwelling coomer.
If you did this, they'd just start discriminating against men.
Way to score in your own goal there idiot.
If you haven't understood yet, you never will : Men protecting Women is a biological imperative. It takes multiple women to keep the human race going, it takes way less men. That's just how Nature is. It's why men hunted and why women picked fruit.
In this age of individualism, where people have been persuaded that they can be whatever they want to be, biology is too much for people to stomach. They hate you for telling the truth.
I will say this though. The cause for those privileges having ceased, the effects should also cease. If women aren't going to have kids, but instead going to act like men, those should lose the privileges. Sort of like French nobles losing their noble status if they engaged in commerce.
This is sort of the entire point of traditional marriage. Women who bear children get special status (Mrs) and physical protection beyond the law.
It all comes back to the destruction of the family which we can, quite accurately, blame on feminism.
Just not wanting to have kids doesn't fix 300,000 years of evolution. Women have been bred and evolved to be weaker physically because they have been sidelined all this time to protect the child bearing capabilities of the species.
You can't change that with 2 generations. Men and Women are biologically different. That is rooted in one of the sex being the child bearing sex.
I, too, think we need easier access to guns.
No, you don't get it.
MEN would start discriminating against MEN. It wouldn't destroy shit about the "Good woman" (since you know, that's just reality) and it would leave your Incel freak ass alone and starving.
It would however prove the women right : They are being used as slave labour to keep wages artificially low.
Is your mother a good woman, or is she an evil witch like the rest of 'em?
Having actually worked and interacted with women, you'd be surprised to know that they don't in fact, spew hate. But that again would require you to actually not be a basement dwelling coomer.