The obvious solution is to designate parts of existing prisons for them like we do with the other pedophiles. So this guy should have been in a special section of the male prison. Or let the general population deal with him. He's not a woman but he's the closest thing a lot of the other inmates have seen in years. We could kill 2 birds with one stone that way.
Well, they've since moved him out of the women's prison, where he never should have been in the first place, to "Garden State Youth Correctional Facility, a prison for young adult offenders." Which I don't get because he is 27.
They looked at this guy and thought, 'man, if we could get him to impregnate a minor, that would be even better! We need to minors pregnant! It's the only way to get abortion back!'
Apparently it was consensual (at least that's what I've heard; I can't back it up with a source). Obviously if it was a guard it wouldn't matter but since it's prisoner on prisoner- there's no abusable power dynamic and having a dick in a women's prison has gotta help your odds.
Right. It was consensual in the sense that there was no coercion involved. Legally it was rape because any sexual contact with a prisoner is legally rape.
They used to be called insane asylums.
"But I'm a woman this is sexual assault let me go hey-"
"Let's get you back to your bunk, Jaxon."
"IT'S JACKIE JAXON IS MY DEADNAME NO ONE HAS ASSIGNED A BUNK TO MY REAL NAME THIS IS SEXUAL SEXUAL DO YOU HEAR ME IM TOTALLY SUING"
"Okay bud let's go"
Why? Why should we the tax payer have to cough up the funds for an extra set of facilities because a bunch of people are delusional?
If I claim to be the Emperor Napoleon, they throw me in a regular old prison, instead of making me the King of Elba.
The obvious solution is to designate parts of existing prisons for them like we do with the other pedophiles. So this guy should have been in a special section of the male prison. Or let the general population deal with him. He's not a woman but he's the closest thing a lot of the other inmates have seen in years. We could kill 2 birds with one stone that way.
Pretty sure that violates the eighth amendment- but so does the current situation.
Uhhh-
They looked at this guy and thought, 'man, if we could get him to impregnate a minor, that would be even better! We need to minors pregnant! It's the only way to get abortion back!'
Tax payer funded tranny easy rape tour; he got the women and now he gets the kids.
Make prisons sex seggregated. Who the fuck died and and changed it to the "Gender standard" anyway. It never was about gender.
It's HER active sperm you bigot
It's called 'raping', MSM.
Apparently it was consensual (at least that's what I've heard; I can't back it up with a source). Obviously if it was a guard it wouldn't matter but since it's prisoner on prisoner- there's no abusable power dynamic and having a dick in a women's prison has gotta help your odds.
Right. It was consensual in the sense that there was no coercion involved. Legally it was rape because any sexual contact with a prisoner is legally rape.
So, technically he was also raped?
Yes, technically the 2 sexual encounters in question consisted of the participants raping each other.
Oh, it's the thing that ''never happens, you transmysoginist bigot'' that keeps hapening.
Everyone knows women have big hard dicks and a tendency to be rapey.