They don't treat girls as royalty, and even if they did, if permissive parenting has shown anything - it's that this does not actually produce good results.
The fact that they bury it further than most will read?
The fourth paragraph.
Well, if you invested all you had in BTC (the most volatile investment available) just before the value crashed, sitting at 64000, you would have lost roughly a third of that
Hindsight is 20/20.
while child support would take 50% if not higher (particularly in corrupt inner-city courts), on top of divorce settlements and alimony. Good understanding of risk would say both of these ideas are absolutely stupid ways to lose money.
All of history shows that being a genetic dead end is a pretty stupid way to waste your life.
I don't know why anybody would want to have a kid now like I have an 18 month old and I fear for her future and my old lady wants another and I keep telling her this timeline were in sucks and it's only getting suckier so no kid for you
The suck is actually pretty unevenly distributed, in a geographical sense. And overall, roughly 96% of the suck in my life comes from the internet.
Teach your kids not to become employees, unless they have no IQs. Show them how to live apart from the dominant social paradigm, and to enjoy life instead.
Imagine the cope that these females will have soon, now that most men have chosen to remained free of females. Also, the higher the income level and intelligence the less likely it is for procreation since there is a lot of factors that take place, but to narrow it down it boils down to the r/K selection theory. It's actually low income class people and dysgenic people that breed the most. Also genetic is an extremely complex thing, there are people that are born with godtier genetics that don't amount to much, there are many examples of warriors and even aristocrats of old have failed to properly procreate and maintain a good pure line.
Apparently, those who don't have kids have defective genetics.
Uh, yeah. I could have told you this without the need for any 'study'.
BTW: "it explains less than 1% of the overall likelihood of childlessness."
Good risk management is now officially considered a disability
What is the good risk management?
Jokes aside, this is yet another example of feminist propaganda media using a study they either didn't understand or didn't want to understand, to make women look better.
That's about as intelligent as 'not taking the risk' of being hit by a car by not going outside.
Nothing bad is going to happen to a man who doesn't get married.
Locking yourself up in a house is detrimental to your health. hikikomori can attest to that.
How?
By labeling any assertive male action as toxic masculinity and presenting them in pop culture as bubbling idiot dads.
Nothing bad is going to happen to a man who doesn't get married. Locking yourself up in a house is detrimental to your health. hikikomori can attest to that.
Being a genetic dead end ain't great.
By labeling any assertive male action as toxic masculinity and presenting them in pop culture as bubbling idiot dads.
Except the risk of being hit by a car is infinitesimal in comparison to the risk of women.
How many die because of cars, and how many because of the women you swear are out to kill you?
You don't need a woman unless you're a tradcon retard who unironically calls people coomers despite having risked their entire future just for the promise of regular sex.
Evidently, you don't know what traditionalism is about.
This is the classic blank slate argument against any genetic study whatsoever.
Which is pretty stupid.
When we are together in line for the feminist gas chambers, I'll be sure to apologize and recognize you were right all along.
Female children as well.
Basketcases mess up kids.
They don't treat girls as royalty, and even if they did, if permissive parenting has shown anything - it's that this does not actually produce good results.
They cut themselves, troon out, and that's just the beginning of it. These are not going to have a good life.
This one?
And he's quoted in the article. So what exactly is your complaint?
Show me what you are basing this on.
The fourth paragraph.
Hindsight is 20/20.
All of history shows that being a genetic dead end is a pretty stupid way to waste your life.
This is part of their genocide against men who display masculine behavior. They are trying to kill you all.
I don't know why anybody would want to have a kid now like I have an 18 month old and I fear for her future and my old lady wants another and I keep telling her this timeline were in sucks and it's only getting suckier so no kid for you
The suck is actually pretty unevenly distributed, in a geographical sense. And overall, roughly 96% of the suck in my life comes from the internet.
Teach your kids not to become employees, unless they have no IQs. Show them how to live apart from the dominant social paradigm, and to enjoy life instead.
Imagine the cope that these females will have soon, now that most men have chosen to remained free of females. Also, the higher the income level and intelligence the less likely it is for procreation since there is a lot of factors that take place, but to narrow it down it boils down to the r/K selection theory. It's actually low income class people and dysgenic people that breed the most. Also genetic is an extremely complex thing, there are people that are born with godtier genetics that don't amount to much, there are many examples of warriors and even aristocrats of old have failed to properly procreate and maintain a good pure line.
Sorry, ladies. It’s all your fault.
Somehow KIA isn't jumping on the Will Smith cuckold violence situation.
explain why dick are shrinking
Uh, yeah. I could have told you this without the need for any 'study'.
BTW: "it explains less than 1% of the overall likelihood of childlessness."
What is the good risk management?
How exactly does this make women look better?
Not taking risk.
By making men look worse.
That's about as intelligent as 'not taking the risk' of being hit by a car by not going outside.
How?
Nothing bad is going to happen to a man who doesn't get married. Locking yourself up in a house is detrimental to your health. hikikomori can attest to that.
By labeling any assertive male action as toxic masculinity and presenting them in pop culture as bubbling idiot dads.
Being a genetic dead end ain't great.
This article does that?
Only if your country practices bull taxes like Poland once did.
Do you know what insinuations are?
How many die because of cars, and how many because of the women you swear are out to kill you?
Evidently, you don't know what traditionalism is about.
But it is the one you are consistently complaining about.
OK, how many men are disfigured by cars vs. women?
They are pre-actively programming females today to not take blame to what's currently happening in the sexual market.