The fact that they bury it further than most will read?
Well, if you invested all you had in BTC (the most volatile investment available) just before the value crashed, sitting at 64000, you would have lost roughly a third of that, while child support would take 50% if not higher (particularly in corrupt inner-city courts), on top of divorce settlements and alimony. Good understanding of risk would say both of these ideas are absolutely stupid ways to lose money.
The fact that they bury it further than most will read?
The fourth paragraph.
Well, if you invested all you had in BTC (the most volatile investment available) just before the value crashed, sitting at 64000, you would have lost roughly a third of that
Hindsight is 20/20.
while child support would take 50% if not higher (particularly in corrupt inner-city courts), on top of divorce settlements and alimony. Good understanding of risk would say both of these ideas are absolutely stupid ways to lose money.
All of history shows that being a genetic dead end is a pretty stupid way to waste your life.
And he's quoted in the article. So what exactly is your complaint?
Show me what you are basing this on.
The fact that they bury it further than most will read?
Well, if you invested all you had in BTC (the most volatile investment available) just before the value crashed, sitting at 64000, you would have lost roughly a third of that, while child support would take 50% if not higher (particularly in corrupt inner-city courts), on top of divorce settlements and alimony. Good understanding of risk would say both of these ideas are absolutely stupid ways to lose money.
The fourth paragraph.
Hindsight is 20/20.
All of history shows that being a genetic dead end is a pretty stupid way to waste your life.