Teachers prioritized and coddled the girls in all things. Everything from giving the girls first pick of seats of and equipment, to insanely lenient punishment whent they misbehaved (If they were bullying a male victim, he would be punished, because it would be automatically assumed their animosity to him was his fault, and fully justified), to preferential one-on-one instruction with the teachers, to being placed in positions of authority over other students (hall monitors and library assistants, 100% girls or homosexuals).
That was in 2000. I can only imagine what it's like in that school now.
Problem with the heroic narrative. With a villain you're a brave hero fighting evil forces. You want to do the same thing without a villain, you're just some psychopath venturing across the country killing random people for no reason.
Even when muh traditional conservatism was the norm in America, men and women protected women and disregarded men as disposable.
It was just done in a different way. In the end of all this, men are still given the short end of the stick no matter what ideology you put them under.
Ironically, pushing trans-rights to the extreme might actually afford men some equality. For example if men are able to identify as women without surgery or chemicals, female privilege becomes available for all.
Is not like minorities are not profiting and pushing this further. Yes white women do this in mass but is not like black people are against it, they are agreeing and asking for more. No minority is pushing back against the anti-white propaganda in any relevant numbers, the last 5-6 years woke me up to a strange amount of hate against white people, both from liberal whites and minorities.
Hey I'm with you there, feminists propped up race relations in order to get more power.
However race relations are extremely bad and this has been do to globalists and feminists. I know you think feminists are running everything but they are just part of it, feminism would not have had as much power if they did not get propped up by globalists in an attempt to destabilize the west and to reduce birth rates.
Now they use race relations combine with mass immigration to destabilize even more, up until no modern country will be able to function as there is nothing at a national level to unify us.
And minorities are just all to happy to throw white people and white men in particular , under the bus for more privileges.
Yes but no out-group bias could exist without the participation of the race in question. Blaming outsiders doesn't make sense to me. If the race is strong and has faith, it would never consider adopting this attitude.
To me, the white race is currently very pathetically weak and needs to admit the problem is internal in order to fix it. Blaming outsiders like you're a victim will perpetuate the problem.
Normally everyone has a bias towards their own group so of course women have an in-group bias. But people of certain races also have a racial in-group bias
TITS or GTFO exists for a reason.
Reminds me of this gem: https://i.imgur.com/NArL0KH.png
Exactly!
Shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone who has been paying attention
I figured this shit out as 13 year old schoolboy.
Teachers prioritized and coddled the girls in all things. Everything from giving the girls first pick of seats of and equipment, to insanely lenient punishment whent they misbehaved (If they were bullying a male victim, he would be punished, because it would be automatically assumed their animosity to him was his fault, and fully justified), to preferential one-on-one instruction with the teachers, to being placed in positions of authority over other students (hall monitors and library assistants, 100% girls or homosexuals).
That was in 2000. I can only imagine what it's like in that school now.
Problem with the heroic narrative. With a villain you're a brave hero fighting evil forces. You want to do the same thing without a villain, you're just some psychopath venturing across the country killing random people for no reason.
Is nature magazine a far right/white supremacist magazine now?
I did this for lols
Why do they always conflate being female and non-white, so you can't see what is more powerful?
OP, look up gynocentrism.
Even when muh traditional conservatism was the norm in America, men and women protected women and disregarded men as disposable.
It was just done in a different way. In the end of all this, men are still given the short end of the stick no matter what ideology you put them under.
Ironically, pushing trans-rights to the extreme might actually afford men some equality. For example if men are able to identify as women without surgery or chemicals, female privilege becomes available for all.
At least in terms of law, policy and funding.
Jail politicians and students. Problem solved.
Worst white supremacist patriarchy ever.
Is not like minorities are not profiting and pushing this further. Yes white women do this in mass but is not like black people are against it, they are agreeing and asking for more. No minority is pushing back against the anti-white propaganda in any relevant numbers, the last 5-6 years woke me up to a strange amount of hate against white people, both from liberal whites and minorities.
Who created BLM again?
Nothing made race relations worse than a bunch of lesbians pretending to care while they stole all the money.
Hey I'm with you there, feminists propped up race relations in order to get more power.
However race relations are extremely bad and this has been do to globalists and feminists. I know you think feminists are running everything but they are just part of it, feminism would not have had as much power if they did not get propped up by globalists in an attempt to destabilize the west and to reduce birth rates. Now they use race relations combine with mass immigration to destabilize even more, up until no modern country will be able to function as there is nothing at a national level to unify us.
And minorities are just all to happy to throw white people and white men in particular , under the bus for more privileges.
You're missing the point.
BLM never cared about Floyd or any of the others. It was all about putting a feminist hammer through the fragile glass that is current race relations.
It was about making sure nobody important ever uttered the words "female privilege".
What's the equivalent of invading Russia in the winter?
I'm sorry but how is a movement that's 100% female and led by lesbian not related to women?
You're pointing to the effect and calling it the cause. No race or ethnicity spontaneously develops out-group bias.
Yes but no out-group bias could exist without the participation of the race in question. Blaming outsiders doesn't make sense to me. If the race is strong and has faith, it would never consider adopting this attitude.
To me, the white race is currently very pathetically weak and needs to admit the problem is internal in order to fix it. Blaming outsiders like you're a victim will perpetuate the problem.
I will shout this from the rooftops until race baiters get it - women's in-group bias is gender based, not race based.
There are obvious reasons for this, related to evolution.
Normally everyone has a bias towards their own group so of course women have an in-group bias. But people of certain races also have a racial in-group bias
I don't know why you are downvoted. Whites are and have been the majority. It literally could not have happened without their willing participation.