It's criminal that the mainstream media don't report on this information. If people want to get the vaccine, they really should be self isolating for 1 month after the shot because if they get Covid in within 28 days, their have additional risk of getting myocarditis.
The spike proteins themselves are toxic and cause issues in cells, eg micro trauma and endothelial damage which leads to blood clots.
Because they're toxic, the cells that produce them are targeted. Which are your own cells.
Heart disease is a problem in general because your heart have both a lower rate of repair then the rest of your body, at the trade off of pretty much never getting cardiac cancer. And the repair mechanism for heart damage causes issue in itself, eg plaques which narrow coronary arteries.
The probable reason for heart issues is that it's just the most noticeable area and the first to show damage in your body.
These injections are not like inactivated pathogen vaccines because they teach your own cells to generate the "invader" which causes your immune system to attack any cells that are producing this protein. Instead of attacking the pathogen directly, whichever cells the mrna packets are being delivered to are being targeted. Aka ovaries, heart, liver...
Well if it's using the vaers data, then the real number is probably 20x higher.
Also in these (under 40) groups covid has a .02% fatality rate in hospitalizations. Which assuming the vaccines have a 100% success rate, which its doubtful they have even a 30% success rate lol, would mean that for every 3 they save, they give 1 myocarditis with 56% fatality rate in 5 years. Oh and.... give that to the entire population and not just the 1-5% of covid cases that actually need hospitalization. Well lets say you save .02% of 5%, but you give the entire 100% a .0035 chance of death in exchange. In a million people that .02% of 5% would be 1000 people. That. 0035% of the whole vax pop would be 3500. That's assuming that the vax works 100% of the time and not counting any of the blood clot deaths, any of the cancer deaths, any of the vaids deaths, or any of the other side effect deaths. Save one to kill 3.5 with just the mycarditis alone.
Do you have a source for that 56% fatality rate in 5 years with myocarditis? I keep hearing people about this, even Dr. Malone said something like this, but I just can't find where it comes from.
Acute myocarditis mostly does not sufficiently respond to symptomatic medication for heart failure, and mortality is high in spite of treatment. The long-term disease course depends on the pathogen, the extent and type of inflammation, and the initial injury to the myocardium. Focal borderline myocarditis often undergoes spontaneous clinical healing if no serious heart failure developed initially. The early mortality of fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis requiring intensive care is in excess of 40% in the first 4 weeks (7). Untreated giant cell and eosinophilic myocarditis also have an extremely poor prognosis, with 4 year survival rates of less than 20% (8). Granulomatous necrotizing myocarditis is lethal if overlooked and untreated. Non-fulminant active myocarditis has a mortality rate of 25% to 56% within 3 to 10 years, owing to progressive heart failure and sudden cardiac death, especially if symptomatic heart failure manifests early on (9– 11, e1). In addition to impaired left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function, virus persistence, chronic inflammation, and cardiodepressive autoantibodies are independent predictors of a poor prognosis (9, 12, 13).
First study I found on duckduckgo. 56% is a simplification, but is fairly accurate as internet talking points go. Some diseases that cause myocarditis don't do as much damage, but the viruses that do tend to do the most. The vaccine, with it's graphene nanoparticles (contamination?) and viral spike protein factory cells could in fact be far worse than other know causes of myocarditis, but that is not known yet. The important thing to know is that a large number of people die within weeks of myocaritis and everyone who survives, survives with damaged hearts that don't heal. Longterm survival is basically reliant on how much damage and if the person can get away with basically not exerting themselves or increasing their heart rate for the rest of their lives.
I think this is the same paper where they also mentioned in Israel extra myocarditis is 1 in 20,000... but then they just totally ignore that and say 'but we'll just believe CDC and UK are right and Israel are lying so it's 1 couple per million... yeah... that's the ticket'.
It's criminal that the mainstream media don't report on this information. If people want to get the vaccine, they really should be self isolating for 1 month after the shot because if they get Covid in within 28 days, their have additional risk of getting myocarditis.
Quebec is currently mass-boosting everyone with Moderna. Honk honk.
Of course it's deliberate. What would be the point of lying so much to get needles in arms if there wasn't an ulterior motive
Feminists are useful idiots. But no, most people reject all conspiracy without thought
Dude, the bolsheviks are doing the same thing they always do. It's not feminists, they just push feminism because it's destructive.
From what I've read it's because of 2 issues.
The spike proteins themselves are toxic and cause issues in cells, eg micro trauma and endothelial damage which leads to blood clots.
Because they're toxic, the cells that produce them are targeted. Which are your own cells.
Heart disease is a problem in general because your heart have both a lower rate of repair then the rest of your body, at the trade off of pretty much never getting cardiac cancer. And the repair mechanism for heart damage causes issue in itself, eg plaques which narrow coronary arteries. The probable reason for heart issues is that it's just the most noticeable area and the first to show damage in your body.
These injections are not like inactivated pathogen vaccines because they teach your own cells to generate the "invader" which causes your immune system to attack any cells that are producing this protein. Instead of attacking the pathogen directly, whichever cells the mrna packets are being delivered to are being targeted. Aka ovaries, heart, liver...
Why would you provide no link to the study and or article about said study?
I'm assuming it's this but not sure: https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1100,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F820d98d2-15d0-41a8-b7ea-7ac2c828e805_2672x1476.png
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.23.21268276v1.full.pdf
Worth also noting that the red bar of covid-attributed myocarditis is too high even as it stands, due to undercounting the true number of covid cases.
Scientific publications have a DOI assigned to it. Post the DOI and other people are able to access it.
As an example most likely this is the doi for your source: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.23.21268276
these niggars need to go to jail. every last goddamned one of them
Well if it's using the vaers data, then the real number is probably 20x higher.
Also in these (under 40) groups covid has a .02% fatality rate in hospitalizations. Which assuming the vaccines have a 100% success rate, which its doubtful they have even a 30% success rate lol, would mean that for every 3 they save, they give 1 myocarditis with 56% fatality rate in 5 years. Oh and.... give that to the entire population and not just the 1-5% of covid cases that actually need hospitalization. Well lets say you save .02% of 5%, but you give the entire 100% a .0035 chance of death in exchange. In a million people that .02% of 5% would be 1000 people. That. 0035% of the whole vax pop would be 3500. That's assuming that the vax works 100% of the time and not counting any of the blood clot deaths, any of the cancer deaths, any of the vaids deaths, or any of the other side effect deaths. Save one to kill 3.5 with just the mycarditis alone.
Do you have a source for that 56% fatality rate in 5 years with myocarditis? I keep hearing people about this, even Dr. Malone said something like this, but I just can't find where it comes from.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3370379/
First study I found on duckduckgo. 56% is a simplification, but is fairly accurate as internet talking points go. Some diseases that cause myocarditis don't do as much damage, but the viruses that do tend to do the most. The vaccine, with it's graphene nanoparticles (contamination?) and viral spike protein factory cells could in fact be far worse than other know causes of myocarditis, but that is not known yet. The important thing to know is that a large number of people die within weeks of myocaritis and everyone who survives, survives with damaged hearts that don't heal. Longterm survival is basically reliant on how much damage and if the person can get away with basically not exerting themselves or increasing their heart rate for the rest of their lives.
It'd be really cool if you had a link to the whole study so we could spread it.
I think this is the same paper where they also mentioned in Israel extra myocarditis is 1 in 20,000... but then they just totally ignore that and say 'but we'll just believe CDC and UK are right and Israel are lying so it's 1 couple per million... yeah... that's the ticket'.