CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — A former top executive in a North Carolina-based health care system who claimed in a lawsuit that he lost his job because he is a white male was awarded $10 million by a federal jury on Tuesday.
In his 2019 lawsuit, David Duvall said he lost his job as senior vice president of marketing and communication at Novant Health due to efforts to diversify top leadership positions, news outlets reported. The jury said Novant Health failed to prove that it would have dismissed Duvall regardless of his race.
Duvall said in his lawsuit that he was fired in 2018 without warning or explanation shortly before his fifth anniversary with the company. He said he was replaced by two women, one Black and one white. Duvall, who worked in Mecklenburg County, accused Novant of violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits race and gender discrimination in the workplace.
Honestly glad to hear that. I hope it sticks. Anti discrimination laws are supposed to be for the benefit of whites as well. Now let’s fix public colleges
Can’t remember who said it first, but the last people who will gain equal treatment under the law will be whites, men, straights, and Christians.
When that happens, everyone else will abandon equality under the law. We’re already seeing this from the left. When a principle no longer advantages them, then it becomes a liability.
Is trans-black a thing now?
I guess it kinda makes sense if you want to win the lead role in Braveheart 2022.
If race and gender are both social constructs, why do we let people choose their gender but not their race? I have yet to receive a convincing explanation for this.
Idk but it would be fun to hear a liberal fascist explain why it isn’t
He used to be white. He still is, but he used to be, too.
Well that never happens. How long before it's overturned on appeal?
As soon as they find a female judge to do it.
Its a shame that you have to be an executive in the health industry to even have a fighting chance.
That was honestly my first thought as well but I wanted want to inject something negative into a rare positive article.
"I never though I could lose my job, I only mean for YOU to lose your job!"
He played long game.
What the fuck is this boomer tier shit? We taught you all better than this.
The goal of archiving is to avoid giving traffic to shitty articles.
But why would I want to avoid giving traffic to good articles like this? I want to see more of these.
No you stupid fuck, the point of archiving is to make sure the information is still there when shady as fuck journos try to make it disappear.
Sounds like you're one of those bot posters deliberating having a meltdown.
He's being a dick but he's right. There's nothing more that journalists love than rewriting history. Archives prevent that.
I've kind of given up on being nice about this and a lot of other things. People need to be rebuked when they're wrong.
In my opinion you're missing the broader picture.
The news orgs drove the man-hating narrative partially because it got them views. A lot of views.
When you start making sure stories that benefit you carefully hide how many views they're getting, I think you've reached the point of being so dominated you're sabotaging yourself on their behalf.
An archive contains a link to the original url. By using an archive, you can satisfy both sides, because people that care about click measurement can visit the original.
Edit: after reading some of your other comments, I think you should leave this place because you aren't ready for it. Lurk for 2 more years, as they say.
You wish I was a bot newfag.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Approved: Call him a fag back.
Many in the medical field today are people of color. Most whites are being replaced when it comes to medicine and so forth, good luck landing in a hospital.
Most expensive Get Woke Go Broke yet? At least in measurable way?
I suppose a movie like Terminator Dark Fate failing completely at the box office is probably bigger. If it didn't make back its budget and PR costs. But you can never know what the actual profit would have been had it been a success.
Something like this 10M is so tangible and brutal for future scum fucks trying to use Woke discrimination against employees.
I really hope this is the case.
Well, for once a white man gets right from the judge, it's almost like a miracle...
It took two women to do a single man's job and i bet they couldn't even do it
Takes two women to do the job of one man eh?
So weird how they were both women.
I thought it's black men that were supposedly getting all the handouts, according to race baiters.
Edit : Already getting the butthurt downvotes. I thought diversity was about race? White women aren't any more "diverse" by that logic, yet there they are, getting their usual special treatment.
Same. I've always heard the holy trifecta of not getting fired is to be black, female, and queer.
I think you'll find that the majority of the "race-baiters" on this site are antifeminists as well. You act like you invented the concept sometimes.
Correct.
He needs to stop being a faggot and stick to his message of "all women bad", but he can't seem to help himself from injecting "but white women extra bad". It's almost like he has some interest in guiding animosity towards them specifically for some reason.
Watch 3rd party BLM protest video and it's like 3/4ths white women. Almost always mean looking white women.
The narrative is to try to push you to hate based on race etc - but they're not really the ones pushing this. This is driven by white women wanting something to fetishize on their facebook feeds and complain about.
It's a game where mostly white women punish you, then go "Look over there! That other-race person is coming after you!" - on what I assume is pushed more by rich corporate interests.
Women don't do this you dipshit. How are you so wrong about everything today?
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Approved: Dipshit isn't a slur.
Yawn. Bored with Gaslighting Hate-Bots.
Go be a faggot somewhere else.
Go be a socially retarded propaganda bot somewhere else.
Diversity is about a lot of things.
There is a reason that diversity became synonym with anti-white males. Women are favored in tech, by a huge margin but if you are a women of color then you hit the jack pot. You can do almost no work and you will get more money then those around you while having no fear of being fired or hurting your future job prospects. If you are a black guy, depends a bit on the field, women tend to favor other women but they will still hire a black guy over a white or asian guy.
The black guy will still never get fired but internally it will not have as much favoritism as a women.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Comment Approved: That's not how that rule works.
Not sure what's false. Even the title says they're both women.