On July 1, 2015, 32-year-old Kathryn ("Kate") Steinle was shot and killed while walking with her father and a friend along Pier 14 in the Embarcadero district of San Francisco. She was hit in the back by a single bullet.
A single-action cowboy revolver sure as shit doesn't go off TWICE by accident. You have to manually pull back the hammer after each shot. Once could be an accident, maybe, if it was already sitting around with the hammer back, but twice? Nope. There's some fuckery going on.
Nope. Sure, it probably didn't help. But the problem was letting a dumbass who has repeatedly shown he has anger issues and thinks he is above the rules have a live weapon (even if it was only loaded with blanks). $100 says that ultimately this was Baldwin pointing it at people and pulling the trigger to feel all powerful only to have it actually do what a gun is supposed to do when you pull the trigger.
FTA:
(X) Doubt
That’s literally the excuse that the illegal immigrant who shot Kate Steinle in the head. He got off scott free.
This is an earlier event that happened a couple days prior, but it does demonstrate a pattern of poor weapons handling on set.
The Pedia's Google blurb:
Sentient bullets did it again
Apparently people don't, in fact, kill people. It was indeed the guns acting independently all along.
A single-action cowboy revolver sure as shit doesn't go off TWICE by accident. You have to manually pull back the hammer after each shot. Once could be an accident, maybe, if it was already sitting around with the hammer back, but twice? Nope. There's some fuckery going on.
they have said what kinda wep it was. baldwins was a revolver... the other isfire has not been described in better detail to know.
Well, they were shooting a western, so I doubt they had many MAC-10's on-set.
Vultures are circling.
If they werent handled and loaded properly... methinks you know little about the training that goes in to onset firearms.
Well there's your problem right there.
Oh you bitch
something else said she was the 24 year old daughter of a famous armorer who had only wrked on 1 other film
Nope. Sure, it probably didn't help. But the problem was letting a dumbass who has repeatedly shown he has anger issues and thinks he is above the rules have a live weapon (even if it was only loaded with blanks). $100 says that ultimately this was Baldwin pointing it at people and pulling the trigger to feel all powerful only to have it actually do what a gun is supposed to do when you pull the trigger.
it said they walked off because they were concerned about weapon safety... its just as believable anyone who thinks alec baldwin is a passable actor
Hummm...