They would be following behind China in their attempt to raise birth rates.
It's almost like they see some kind of massive collapse on the horizon and are trying to legally fortify positions to ensure their people maintain growth and proper family units.
Lots of Russian women are quite beautiful, so it should be easy to pair them up with the men. I'm not really sure what the mindset is of most Russian women, though, whether they resent their femininity and the role of the female in a nuclear family like Western women do or if they're more traditional.
I'm of two minds on this. Stripping away freedoms to enforce strong birth rates and families can actually lead to disruptions and rebellion... unless people actually want to be together and responsibly raise families with a significant other. Then it's compelling people to do what they already desire.
On the other hand, I can see how something like this is useful to safeguard their society against the globohomo agenda. Hungary, Poland, and China also know how dangerous the Rainbow Reich is and how it can completely disrupt and destroy not just current societies but entire generational lineages. All brought to cessation due to hedonistic homosexuality.
For some things I think hard-line stances are necessary when you see the dangers racing toward you, sort of like the immigration invasion plaguing America and other first-world nations. Mitigating the danger is the right response.
If the psychological health of the people aren't negatively impacted with these policies, then it's not a bad thing. It prevents the Rainbow Reich from establishing a foothold anywhere in the country, and also encourages men to raise families and for women to be help-meets. So long as they don't have to deal with Jewish-ran/CCP-funded Cultural Marxism invading the sociopolitical or academic scene, their plan just might work.
They would be following behind China in their attempt to raise birth rates.
This is what I thought. If it happens, its for the same reasons that China is doing what it has been doing. China isnt banning video games, gay stuff, and all the other things its been banning because its suddenly "based" or for some grand scheme. Its because their absolute midwit smoothbrain leaders kneecapped their own population advantage because for some reason no one in the elite is able to figure out that Malthus was a hack.
Not only does his theory not account for changes in growth rates because things will naturally adapt to fit their environments (I would personally argue the reason you have seen so much slow down in national growth rates is a natural realignment due to many nations being overcrowded).
Not only does it not account for increased productivity that can fix the issue that is being shown (See: Green Revolution, and the rumors here in farm country is we are about to have another revolution in farming).
You want to know the event that Malthus used as the basis for his theory that there is an upper limit to population and you need to do all of the extreme control on it? The Irish Potato Famine. You know, one of the most infamous man-made famines in history! Ireland made enough cereal crops to weather what was happening. It would have sucked, but they could have made it through without the potatoes. Except that then the English came in and said "Ours now" and took all of their own crops to distribute it back to them in amounts not nearly high enough. And this is the entire basis for his theory.
He is about on par with Lysenko as far as "smart scientist" go.
We will always be stuck providing for them. Unless we decide this is the last generation ever and sterilize every living person, we will always need them in our lives and they will always need our support. They spend close to a year literally losing the ability to support themselves for each child they pop.
They literally need our support to make babies for us. You know, that thing that allows a man to continue his legacy into the future and have some value for all he has built, instead of letting it fall to ruin the day he dies?
Unless you believe only in unfettered hedonism as the only purpose for life, then we need them in some capacity and need to support them in some equal amount to bare our young. And if you are pro-unfettered hedonism, because then your goals would be exactly like them. Hatred and hedonism.
Why did Soros brag about his days under the Nazi regime?
They consider themselves to be Nobles by blood, and everyone else is beneath them. The imported masses are simply fodder for a greater agenda. Who cares if most of them die? They aren't needed anyway.
Is it really such a bad thing to move in the opposite direction? To encourage people to actually be together instead of using gay ops to keep people apart?
How so? You say you pay more in taxes than 'MGTOW' critics do in a year. But they contribute to the continuation of humanity, while you do not. Seems a little more important.
Because people are judged as individuals, not by those who created them or they created.
I did not suggest that people be judged by the sins or merits of their parents. Only that contributions to the continuation of the human race is more valuable than whatever job you do, if you accept that it is desirable.
Besides, I'm not asking for special treatment. I'm asking to be left alone.
But if we leave you alone, we will have to leave everyone like you alone. The birth rate will crater. Retirement benefits become unaffordable without taxing to death the smaller younger generation, ensuring that they will be even less able to have kids, and onward in the death spiral.
Nothing personal, but people like you need to be dealt with ruthlessly.
What he said made me think of a question for you: what do you think of sperm banks? It's a way that you could have genetic descendants without needing to directly deal with a female. I think they generally aren't allowed to get your identifiable data to hunt you down afterwards.
Just unsure of your stance with birthing when it's so indirect. Like, do you think men would be better off if all breeding used such an intermediary to prevent some of the legal woes of traditional relationships?
Let's be clear: this Russian text has a whole paragraph dedicated to defending Russia's great illegal immigrant population on the sole ground they are men.
This is the next installment in the series "Fuck all Men Everywhere"
Why not eradicate divorce laws? why not penalize single motherhood? Why not tighten up borders? Why not incentivize families?
This is a globohomo tactic straight out of their manual.
Coming soon to a country near you!
Putin is a girl.
I'm sure Putin has a couple of girls around to give him orders.
But then again, you always think it's a conspiracy when you spot one of 51% of the population in the vicinity of anything that happened.
Interesting if true.
They would be following behind China in their attempt to raise birth rates.
It's almost like they see some kind of massive collapse on the horizon and are trying to legally fortify positions to ensure their people maintain growth and proper family units.
Lots of Russian women are quite beautiful, so it should be easy to pair them up with the men. I'm not really sure what the mindset is of most Russian women, though, whether they resent their femininity and the role of the female in a nuclear family like Western women do or if they're more traditional.
I'm of two minds on this. Stripping away freedoms to enforce strong birth rates and families can actually lead to disruptions and rebellion... unless people actually want to be together and responsibly raise families with a significant other. Then it's compelling people to do what they already desire.
On the other hand, I can see how something like this is useful to safeguard their society against the globohomo agenda. Hungary, Poland, and China also know how dangerous the Rainbow Reich is and how it can completely disrupt and destroy not just current societies but entire generational lineages. All brought to cessation due to hedonistic homosexuality.
For some things I think hard-line stances are necessary when you see the dangers racing toward you, sort of like the immigration invasion plaguing America and other first-world nations. Mitigating the danger is the right response.
If the psychological health of the people aren't negatively impacted with these policies, then it's not a bad thing. It prevents the Rainbow Reich from establishing a foothold anywhere in the country, and also encourages men to raise families and for women to be help-meets. So long as they don't have to deal with Jewish-ran/CCP-funded Cultural Marxism invading the sociopolitical or academic scene, their plan just might work.
It's certainly worth keeping an eye on.
This is what I thought. If it happens, its for the same reasons that China is doing what it has been doing. China isnt banning video games, gay stuff, and all the other things its been banning because its suddenly "based" or for some grand scheme. Its because their absolute midwit smoothbrain leaders kneecapped their own population advantage because for some reason no one in the elite is able to figure out that Malthus was a hack.
Pretty much totally ignored human creativity.
Its hackery all the way down though.
Not only does his theory not account for changes in growth rates because things will naturally adapt to fit their environments (I would personally argue the reason you have seen so much slow down in national growth rates is a natural realignment due to many nations being overcrowded).
Not only does it not account for increased productivity that can fix the issue that is being shown (See: Green Revolution, and the rumors here in farm country is we are about to have another revolution in farming).
You want to know the event that Malthus used as the basis for his theory that there is an upper limit to population and you need to do all of the extreme control on it? The Irish Potato Famine. You know, one of the most infamous man-made famines in history! Ireland made enough cereal crops to weather what was happening. It would have sucked, but they could have made it through without the potatoes. Except that then the English came in and said "Ours now" and took all of their own crops to distribute it back to them in amounts not nearly high enough. And this is the entire basis for his theory.
He is about on par with Lysenko as far as "smart scientist" go.
Interestingly enough, they are wilely addressing that to some small degree: https://www.npr.org/2021/08/30/1032458104/12-hour-6-day-996-work-schedule-illegal-china-deaths-tech-industry
However, you're right that they still need to de-incentivize women for relying on the system for independence.
Remove women's rights completely then
We will always be stuck providing for them. Unless we decide this is the last generation ever and sterilize every living person, we will always need them in our lives and they will always need our support. They spend close to a year literally losing the ability to support themselves for each child they pop.
Don't let your hate blind you to actual biology.
Frankly, doesn't sound like that bad of a idea, looking at what's going on.
They literally need our support to make babies for us. You know, that thing that allows a man to continue his legacy into the future and have some value for all he has built, instead of letting it fall to ruin the day he dies?
Unless you believe only in unfettered hedonism as the only purpose for life, then we need them in some capacity and need to support them in some equal amount to bare our young. And if you are pro-unfettered hedonism, because then your goals would be exactly like them. Hatred and hedonism.
Why would a blooded noble care about what happens to the rabble in the streets?
Obviously untrue and terrible logic, sir.
Why did Soros brag about his days under the Nazi regime?
They consider themselves to be Nobles by blood, and everyone else is beneath them. The imported masses are simply fodder for a greater agenda. Who cares if most of them die? They aren't needed anyway.
It's just a hierarchy of class by race.
Noble > commoner >>> others
But do they really not want to be with someone else?
America right now is moving in the opposite direction. The Globalists doing everything in their power to force people apart.
Men are more lonely and suicidal than they've ever been: https://www.psycom.net/depression-in-men-male-suicide-rates
Women are more unhappy now than ever before, despite the system bending over backwards to cater to them and make the lives of men miserable: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/18/womens-rights-happiness-wellbeing-gender-gap
Overall, America is moving in a direction where everyone is becoming increasingly unhappy. And young people are becoming increasingly depressed: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/depression-rates-by-country
Is it really such a bad thing to move in the opposite direction? To encourage people to actually be together instead of using gay ops to keep people apart?
Russian females are on a level that I have to assume that any Russian dudes affected or bothered by this are degenerates by default.
Pathetic weasels afraid that they might have to actually contribute to society.
Let's say that you do. Counting them and all their descendants would still put them ahead of you.
How so? You say you pay more in taxes than 'MGTOW' critics do in a year. But they contribute to the continuation of humanity, while you do not. Seems a little more important.
I did not suggest that people be judged by the sins or merits of their parents. Only that contributions to the continuation of the human race is more valuable than whatever job you do, if you accept that it is desirable.
But if we leave you alone, we will have to leave everyone like you alone. The birth rate will crater. Retirement benefits become unaffordable without taxing to death the smaller younger generation, ensuring that they will be even less able to have kids, and onward in the death spiral.
Nothing personal, but people like you need to be dealt with ruthlessly.
I just want to point out the novelty of you somehow managing to be more unreasonable than TheImpossible1
What he said made me think of a question for you: what do you think of sperm banks? It's a way that you could have genetic descendants without needing to directly deal with a female. I think they generally aren't allowed to get your identifiable data to hunt you down afterwards.
Just unsure of your stance with birthing when it's so indirect. Like, do you think men would be better off if all breeding used such an intermediary to prevent some of the legal woes of traditional relationships?
Is that the only issue you'd have? What if you could somehow guarantee that a father exists, at least at the time of insemination?
I like your attitude!
Wouldn't be the first time Eastern Europe had a bachelor tax.
Fake and gay. Also body of "article" has almost zero corelation with headline. Also also tumblr.
Let's be clear: this Russian text has a whole paragraph dedicated to defending Russia's great illegal immigrant population on the sole ground they are men.