In the liberal culture, mental illnesses are pretty much seen as badges of honor. They go in the Twitter bio next to the pronouns. They give you victimhood points, and a diagnosis can give you an edge in school so parents will get them for their kids. What's more, it seems to be a mortal sin to be milquetoast. It is a requirement to deviate in some way. A diagnosis given by a friendly doctor will help. You can even get pills.
Among nobody else is this the case. Liberals of other ethnicities can use that for victimhood points so don't really need a mental illness. Conservatives of course don't have mental illnesses at all, they have character flaws instead.
NO WAY! I always thought they were highly intelligent, stable and level-headed.
Now, I wonder: is their mental illness a cause or a result of their ideology? I assume it must be hard to smear your own race in order to pretend to be "one of the good ones".
No, but yes. It is the result of a system of industrial-scale, psychological and emotional abuse. This industrial-scale abuse is an outgrowth of an ideology of predators.
White Leftists are literally being driven insane by a political system that is intentionally making them emotionally dependent, highly sensitive, highly insecure, and constantly feeling victimized and violated.
The Social Justice Racket itself is a protection racket, that exists to cultivate dependent populations on the protection racket as a reliable source of both income and power to authoritarian minded personalities. Chief among these personalities are sociopaths and narcissists. Sociopaths are seeking power from populations they see as prey that deserve to be predated upon for being to weak to attack them, and narcissists are seeking to cultivate a dependent population that will constantly give them the attention and emotional affirmation that they are actually dependent on. The Sociopathic Narcissist is the predator who thrives most in the Social Justice Racket. They have the drive of affirmation that a narcissist has, but also have the ruthlessness to manipulate social environments to their advantage to cultivate that environment from their prey (or to simply cultivate normal people in to prey).
These abuse tactics and systems they develop are fairly standard among sociopaths and narcissists. The purpose is to create extreme social tension, along with disproportionate and random punishments from the predator, in order to use the prey's insecurity in social status as a weapon to manipulate behavior. Though I have said it before on Reddit, I will re-iterate their tactics:
Expansion of hunting grounds: Radicalization [predators] require a constant inflow of new recruits because prey can be easily exhausted in the predator's hunting ground. Without new inflows of prey, competition between predators will emerge and the environment will collapse as the predators destroy each other. The solution that the Social Justice Racket has come up with for this is to create a Ponzi Scheme of Predators. Each predator/abuser bringing in their own abuse system into the racket, while using the power of the racket to expand upwards. Of the prey that remain will be the prey that can be siphons who can be predated upon long term, and the subversive vassals who bring more prey into the killing fields.
Supplementing Community: When it comes to Social Justice in particular, the hunting grounds use the alure of a sense of community, identity, and emotional satisfaction to attract prey like zebra to a watering hole. This honest desire will be used as a weapon against the prey to cultivate them. In the case of Social Justice in particular, the predators that are most influential the prey's immediate social justice circles, will use very specific tactics to control his emotions which are listed below. This need for community, identity, and emotional satisfaction form the foundation of the killing fields. This what community looks like. Show them what community looks like.
Love-bombing: This is one of the ways the SJ hunting grounds indoctrinate people into thinking they have a loving and supporting community. People who make ideologically correct choices are supported by an enormous amount of emotional affirmation for making the morally right choice. Expect lots of compliments and statements of support. This is what the virtue signaling is for. People can easily start to get addicted to this, and the point. The addiction cultivates a dependency on the predator, and the prey can no longer self-affirm. This generates permanent insecurity, which creates permanent dependency.
Cognitive Overload: Once love-bombed into the hunting grounds, prey will be exposed to an absolute insane word salad of false epistemology that is designed confuse and de-moralize (see: Bezminov). This "cognitive overload" is useful in generating enough confusion and intellectual insecurity to make them susceptible to suggestion from both authority and peer pressure. Although most entire industries seek to reduce cognitive overload due to it's severe consequences, purely malicious actions (like a military unit flanking an enemy position) seek to introduce it. As a military unit seeks to introduce cognitive overload by panicking enemy soldiers into inducing a route, the Social Justice predators introduce cognitive overload to introduce suggestibility to new recruits, as well as a feeling of inadequacy and incompetence among the herd. "I have a lot to learn."
De-individuation: As the prey gets more dependent on the emotional affirmation, they may confront the cognitive overload. The suggestibility of social pressure makes them abandon their own intellectual mechanisms as they are given authority figures, and social groups, that will make decisions for them to reduce the cognitive load that has been introduced. This reliance on affirmation and load reduction begins the process of deindividuating the prey to the herd, and allowing the collective to replace their own judgement, even regarding themselves. Emotional Incontinence and demands of zero boundaries mean that social judgement and stigma replace even private decisions. Every time he follows the instructions of the herd, they will re-affirm his decision as morally right. Making individual choices confers uncomfortable levels of responsibility as the dependency weakens him and as he is not actually the predator moving the herd along, and doesn't want to stick out from the herd. The predator guiding the prey will claim to be the both intellectual and moral authority figure for the group's will as a whole, and will also claim the highest level of victimhood (due to the social status this provides). This can normally be reinforced in media and academia.
Unique knowledge & self-doubt: The prey's cognitive overload comes in neigh-on-indecipherable ideologies like Critical Race Theory, Social Justice, Neo-Marxism, Post-Modernism, and Feminist Philosophy.This is the creation of a false epistemology that is nothing more than a performative display of intellectual authority. The prey will be conditioned to say and accept absurd reductionist claims from authority figures asserting unique knowledge, to alleviate the cognitive overload discussed previously. The reduction of this stress makes these reductions an emotional imperative both to himself and the group. These reductions become incantation for the group to recite. Disruption and dissent from these incantations both increases the cognitive overload, and challenges the social ordering being cultivated by the predator (which would result in a loss of social status and support systems). Thus, the incantations will be rationalized by everyone around him while the 'authority figures' (again, his local leaders, academics, or the press) so that he won't feel like he said something stupid, but is "virtue signaling" his obedience. He will be loved bombed for repeating these mantras in public. Things like "women have penises", "blacks can't be racist", "socialism/communism was never tried", "Kavanaugh is going to kill thousands of women", "you're either a feminist or your a sexist", "Transwomen are women", "Love is Love", "Trust the Science". Dissent from these reductionist statements will not be tolerated. This is the implementation of a totalitarian moral code on the herd in the hunting grounds.
Egg-shells: Hypersensitivity, paranoia, and outrage cultivation: To keep the prey from coming to unacceptable conclusions, the rules that he's operating under will be constantly changing. This creates perpetual cognitive overload. New vocabulary will be subtracted and added by local leadership to maintain control under victims who are confused and perpetually disoriented by the Byzantine rules. This forces the victims to rely, perpetually, on group response and local leadership. This is actually a very common tactic in long-term interrogations by military forces (Make the prisoner dependent on the interrogator). Additionally, they will be made hypersensitive to specific stimuli through conditioning. Forcing people to be constantly upset and outraged as part of performative actions in response to triggering material in the media, or presented by leadership as political objectives (see: Trump Derangement Syndrome). After that is the paranoia, which further increases the sensitivity and reliance on local leadership.
Hate bombing: The moment the prey violates any one of these rules, he will be met with this. A veritable lynch mob of his own friends, associates, co-workers, and even family shaming him, degrading him, humiliating him, and belittling him. The prey will be made emotionally unstable because he will be taken to the highest of the highs with love bombing and the lowest of the lows with hate bombing. The only way for the prey to save itself is to the have an extreme reaction of abject sorrow to his abusers and literally beg for their forgiveness and mercy and to implicate another. They will show the prey only the smallest margin of tolerance and let everyone else know that he is on a razor's edge (further destabilizing him emotionally and psychologically). He will be like an addict who has learned that whenever he does the wrong thing, his friends and family will make him go through withdraw, and then give him a little bit of emotional security back before he actually breaks free of the manipulation. These experiences will be traumatic to watch if he sees them and worse to go through. On the other hand, if he is lucky enough to participate in the hate bombing, his aggression is rewarded with further affirmation. This is the purpose of struggle sessions and lynchings: not only to scape-goat, but to serve as a virtue signal by the other prey who seek to use this as an opportunity to gain emotional security. Everyone who doesn't participate in the lynching will be punished. And since everyone participated in the lynching, if there is ever vengeance or retaliation for the lynching, everyone is complicit in the crime, making them loyal to the one predator who organized it. Saddam did something similar when he killed part of the ba'ath party by having a number of it's members shoot the ones he wanted dead. "Abu Udi, we are with you!"
Social Isolation: The prey is now surrounded by constant emotional reactions. Life outside the hunting grounds includes a litany of pavlovian style triggers that he he has been conditioned for him to respond to. He'll bark at you when you say, "tranny". It will become very difficult for him to operate in normal society because he's been too conditioned, and normal society won't love bomb him like he's grown used to. He's lost the necessary emotional stoicism, self-confidence, and individualism that is necessary to exist in the world. He's trying to deal with the hate bombing he's doing to himself in his own head, because he's internalized his predator's moral imperatives. Since no one else is in the cult, no one else understands what's happening to him, and might even make fun of him for his hypersensitivity. It will be all be seen as a betrayal, and when he goes back to the group, they will agree that the "toxic" people in his life will be cut out.
I've been thinking about this since 2014. A lot of my perceptions from my own experiences with life and abuse have gone into it. I was truly horrified when I started to actually understand what was happening as an industrial system of regular abuse.
This is why I fear a proper genocide, and don't tolerate the National Socialists. The Holocaust was an industrial system of murder that emerged from a similar system of industrial abuse. Same with the Soviet Union's industrial mechanism of abuse as well.
It all only goes in one bad direction. Luckily, I think the system has become so unstable that they won't be able to achieve it. I expect relatively few casualties, as when the USSR collapsed.
I don't think our elites are capable of utilizing violence properly, which makes a genocide difficult for them. Antifa demonstrates this well in that their violence is pretty shit even when given total carte blanche. The GAE is exclusively run by foxes and they don't understand the nature of lions. Samuel T Francis's book Leviathan & It's Enemies is an excellent culmination of elite theory and digs into the differences between the soft managerial regime of the poz and the hard managerial regimes of the Nazis/Soviets.
I agree with that. They have no real hard power, so a proper genocide is likely out, just anachro-tryanny.
There's also the fact that they still have enough access to do very stupid things with the limited hard power that they have.
I don't think for one moment that Kamalla Harris or Nancy Pelosi wouldn't tell a National Guard or Capitol Police unit to fire an M240 machine gun on a crowd of unarmed people.
Now, that would work about as well for them as it did Ceaușescu, but it can still happen.
They don't need hard power. They can genocide you with economic and psychological warfare. They can destroy your borders and your nations, your cultures and your peoples, without firing a shot. In the end, your way of life is just as gone.
I think you're correct that the current rainbow regime is incompetent and unsustainable. I also think that the inevitable collapse of this regime is fully capable of taking a number of peoples, cultures, and nations with it. I don't count that as a victory. We need affirmative defenses, and that means asserting our rights to exist and thrive along national, cultural, and racial/ethnic lines.
Note that this is not a supremacy doctrine. No one, left or right, would deny such rights to any non-white demographic. Such behavior is exclusively forbidden to whites, and this is a direct result of the industrial psychological abuse you have identified. That abuse targets precisely one racial demographic, yes? I mean go accuse an Asian, an Hispanic, or a black person of racism. Do they internalize it? Does it impact their behavior or mental well-being in the slightest?
They can genocide you with economic and psychological warfare. They can destroy your borders and your nations, your cultures and your peoples, without firing a shot. In the end, your way of life is just as gone.
That's just not true, and even a white identitarian like yourself should know that since "White Flight" is a well known thing.
Genocide economically is just not reliable, as your best case scenario is Iran. So long as any government allows enough of a free market to get around international financial restrictions, they're fine. UN sanctions don't do shit, they need proper hard power.
Genocide through psychological warfare is also not enough. Honestly, this has been my biggest complaint with Christians who relied on the government to maintain and institutionalize Christianity. You can't tell me that Burger King and MasterCard have a total hold on your psychology when you have a fucking church you go to every single weekend. Resistance to psychological warfare is already here, and christ almighty, that's basically us.
If you can resist psychological warfare by being an internet shitlord, then they've got their work cut out for them.
As I said before the Fabian Socialists victories, indeed all Leftist victories, come from seizing keystone positions of power. This is why Lennin, even just before his death, was whining that "private capitalism" proved nearly impossible to actually control. There was always some blackmarket that would sprout up somewhere, and even though he had total control of every institution, and it was relatively easy to bring every elite class into the Communist fold (even the militarists, aristocracy, landed gentry, intellectuals, and industrialists), it was the proletariat that remained the most staunchly reactionary force of all, and they just wouldn't come along.
The preservation of your communities, whatever they may be, relies on courage of conviction, maintaining and developing those principles, and actually building strong social networks. All they can do after that is try to shoot everyone, and that always has diminishing returns.
You don't kill the beast, you starve it.
I think you're correct that the current rainbow regime is incompetent and unsustainable. I also think that the inevitable collapse of this regime is fully capable of taking a number of peoples, cultures, and nations with it. I don't count that as a victory.
Look how many people dies from the collapse of the Soviet Union and International Communism. By global measures, practically fucking no one. Even the collapse of European Monarchies had slightly fewer deaths. Most of the deaths of populations came from the expansion of Globalism, and Socialism. The Fabian Order has no chance of killing millions. I'd be way more worried about the likely deaths from a Chinese Civil War, than the collapse of the West.
Such behavior is exclusively forbidden to whites, and this is a direct result of the industrial psychological abuse you have identified. That abuse targets precisely one racial demographic, yes? I mean go accuse an Asian, an Hispanic, or a black person of racism. Do they internalize it? Does it impact their behavior or mental well-being in the slightest?
I don't reject that whites are being explicitly targeted by Black National Socialism at the moment. My problem is that you can't unify around a mechanism which is inherently Leftist and guarantees that keystone position of power to seize.
I'm not going to cry when ComputingForever advocates for the Irish ethnicity not to be dissolved by Fabian Colonialsim, nor when Sargoy Of Applebees advocates for the English to be respected as an aboriginal people to England. But you can't simply assert that an ethnic protection racket is going to protect you from Leftism when those very same ethnic protection rackets are often fostered by Leftists to promote Socialism over and over again. Africa is littered with this kind of shit.
You are more than welcome to oppose Fabian Colonialism and it's importation of foreign slaves into your country, but you can't use an authoritarian system especially a Leftist systems to protect you. You are walking the fox right into the hen house and calling it a rooster. These ideologies are Leftism with a Right-Wing aesthetic because the Leftists know how unpalatable they are.
And of course, pushing for ethnic protection only works in places that are already ethno-states like you have in Europe. America is a wholly different situation because it is, and always has been, a Civic Nation. To be honest, that's a better situation because Communists can't hide behind ethnic claims to defend themselves, they instead have to lie profusely that they don't want a violent revolution against the Civic order.
To defeat Leftism you need decentralized systems of power, meaning Republicanism. Additionally, to prevent Leftists from dominating government structures generally, which you need Liberalism to distrust government coercion and promote heavy suspicion of the government. After that, you need free-market economics to help promote a culture of voluntary interaction between people; which robs the Left of their claims that theft is a necessary act for "justice" as no contract has been violated. Adding on a decentralized religion only reinforces the cultural protections.
But these are all things antithetical to National Socialism and Fascism. They are also generally antithetical to White Nationalism because you are still advocating for a government system that creates a protection racket, which is exactly what will be exploited. This is why we have watched damn near all right-wing authoritarian governments not only fall to Leftism, but be fucking inundated by Leftism.
I think you're completely ignoring the fact that both war and violence have evolved since 1940. The elites aren't capable of true physical violence anymore because they don't need it. The tools for economic and psychological warfare have advanced to the point where traditional violence is basically obsolete. The government doesn't need to kill you when it can simply snuff out your ability to communicate, organize, fund raise, etc. And the moment you fight back with violence, the media frames you as the villain while the whole system comes down on you.
This is why I fear a proper genocide, and don't tolerate the National Socialists.
In this case, the national socialists are the only ones actively working against the genocide, and you don't "tolerate" them because you think their enemies are too incompetent to complete that genocide.
I'll keep an eye out for it. It's a fine line between making something overly detailed and losing people with keeping the requisite history and info in there and your posts do it well.
Thabks, I came to say something along these lines, but you clearly nailed it.
When you look at white liberals as the victims (albeit willing) of the system you describe, their actions make perfect sense. They've abandoned individuality for the power and protection of the group without fully understanding what they've gotten themselves in to.
That's why facts and logic are useless against them, they're in a subjective group reality where truth is maleable.
Any ideas for breaking them loose? I feel there may be opportunities when they cancel one of their own, but often their twice as dedicated after their public shaming. I'm leaning towards the idea that anyone already in is already a write off so we should concentrate everything on bringing up the next generation with an actual community which should prevent them from falling for the decoy.
They are emotional addicts. They need to hit rock bottom and realize that they can't keep doing what they are doing.
I'm not saying "punch a Leftist", I'm saying that you have to make them directly feel the impact of their decisions, then you have to offer individualism and responsibility as an alternative. The difficulty is that taking responsibility is scary, but the collective punishment of the group is also scary; so you have to figure out how to teach them to take responsibility while it's clear that trusting the group with responsibility is a bad idea.
So, for example, say you are dealing with an environmentalist. They are probably clamoring about some sort of virtue signaling bullshit about how their Prius will save the world. You can present all sorts of personal initiatives to them, and focus on ones that involve personal responsibility. Like gardening, soil management, and water management for their home. They are used to just making consumer choices that are validated by the group, but your points about taking personal initiative sound like good ideas (but they are normally just to lazy). You could probably even start out as small as having them grow their own herbs and going to farmers markets (which are normally filled to the limit with Trump supporters, make some excuses about "raw foods" and "locally grown, sustainable, organic, agriculture"). Another idea is to grow trees! Hippies love trees and shit! If they like flowers, suggest a "Bee Pollinator Corridor".
Eventually, the group is going to do something fucking retarded and demand she be executed for not attending a protest or something. Maybe she brought the wrong brand of LeCrox. It doesn't matter, the lynchers will come out.
Use that opportunity to show that she's actually doing the work of land/soil/water/wild-life management, and all these other people are just posers who are virtue-signaling. Meanwhile she has the rain-garden to prove that she manages her own water run-off.
That's just it: Leftists can't build anything. You will have taught her to build something that is still emotionally aligned with her ideology. However, you have subverted the Leftism by teaching her how to build and maintain a thing, and how to have a long time preference. That virtue signaling to the group isn't as important as actually doing stuff, and that her personal success is more important, tangible, and permanent than the group's love-bombing.
Right wing subversion doesn't have to start off with yelling "The John Birch Society Did Nothing Wrong", just as Leftism doesn't start with "Luxury Space Communism Now!" They start the subversion by talking about "rights" and "equality". Start your right-wing subversion with "responsibility" and "individual initiative".
The point is to then do this repeatedly, so that you build their individualism and self-confidence; so that they learn to distrust their previously cherished sources of information and affirmation.
There are those that are truly predators that we can't reach, but they are fewer in number than we think. Maybe, like, 10-20%
I'm leaning towards the idea that anyone already in is already a write off so we should concentrate everything on bringing up the next generation with an actual community which should prevent them from falling for the decoy.
Getting people as they age is actually the easier success story. However, we absolutely have to take the initiative to young people.
It's why we can't stop gaming. We can't reach fucking anyone who is young through traditional means. Gaming clans and competitions have to be a priority. If we can provide them with anti-Left recreational social outlets, that will be more than enough to blunt the effect of Leftism on the Zoomers because they will be moving rightward as they age.
Personally, I think Halo Infinite and Pokemon are excellent opportunities. There seems to be a lot of hype around these games, and given our age, we can still interact with the franchise well enough. We can be the rightist alternative to soyboy game journos crying over their switches.
Not only are all of these tactics present personally. But the crime of this century, is that multiple governments and multiple industries have structured themselves in turning these abuse systems into industrial mechanism to ensure power and control over populations. Social Media, especially Twitter, has turned into a mechanism for these predators: a new hunting ground. It's gamificaiton has made the psychological abuse incentivized through both monetary and social status means. Traditional media has adopted these methods that we first saw in GamerGate used on a mass scale against entire populations. Governments have seen the value in these abuse systems and are now currently promoting these abuse systems with the help of both traditional and social media into crafting new forms of totalitarianism using Covid as an excuse.
The adoption of this abuse hasn't stopped because these abuse systems are effective, and the Ponzi Scheme Predators have expanded their sphere of influence in to damn near every industry they can get ahold of. Those seeking control and dominance of their industries are also promoting it either because they themselves have been ideologically possessed through these same methods, or they have decided that the predation is the most optimal way of controlling the marketplace; which has led us not only to Academia and Media using these methods, but banks as well.
It must be the fight of our lives to resist and break against these institutions that have adopted industrialized mechanisms of mass psychological abuse.
And before you get all black pilled, let me remind you that these ponzi schems can't survive their own perpetual expansion. Their expansion is indicative of their failure. The wider the Ponzi Scheme grows, the more unstable it becomes.
I'm not a religious man, but those of you who are, may understand why I would say this passage is so important right now:
"Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me. Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over."
Courage of conviction and principle must be met against the hordes of this industrialized Evil and it's paymasters. Their collapse is inevitable, and thus our victory is assured. The issue merely whether we are ready for that collapse or not, and whether we will ensure the collapse by never succumbing to the expansion of this manifestation of Hell. It is a power-bubble, and it must collapse if it can't expand.
Here I thought you would go with this, but perhaps it is a bit to aggressive.
So will part 3 deal with the aftermath? and have you done any further pondering upon the bond based system? Would it be viable to start implementing it on a smaller scale in order to get a running alternative system set up? And will all the government hardware go to computer hell ? (/s on the last question).
I may or may not have been blaring that in traffic in my car.
So will part 3 deal with the aftermath? and have you done any further pondering upon the bond based system? Would it be viable to start implementing it on a smaller scale in order to get a running alternative system set up? And will all the government hardware go to computer hell ? (/s on the last question).
You'll have to give me a while to respond to that properly.
Longstory short. People should be a lot more white-pilled than they are. I believe that the 21st century is actually when Liberalism is actually going to emerge naturally among human populations, as 17th century Liberalism was a strange almost England specific fluke of history and geography. Human Commodification had been the norm, and Liberalism was a strange blowback to that which happened to occur in the three places where it could thrive almost uncontested: Britain, France, and the US.
The Era of Human Commodification is coming to an end, and decentralizes Liberal-Like and Republican systems are going to emerge over the coming century which corresponds to the continuing rise of decentralized firepower, with little corresponding rise in defensive technology. AI, drones, anti-ship missiles, miniaturization of railguns, it's all going away from centralized control.
We can expect Regionalism and geographically disparate wars to start taking place. It will not be impossible to see something like a war between Poland and India take place across 3 continents and 15 countries. Due to Geographic, Political, Economic, and Cultural advantages, we are likely to get yet another American century, if the Canadians keep fucking up and don't take it for themselves due to their incredible advantages. India and Russia are likely to do better this century, but they've got innumerable problems. China is far worse off than anyone realizes, and I don't think a Civil War is impossible.
Genuinely Libertarian systems like what I've mentioned may emerge, but it's hard to get them running since there isn't a lot of bedrock to build them up from. I wouldn't be surprised if we found genuine Libertarian governments emerge at least within the US and in a handful of other places scattered around the globe. More likely we will see a kind of managed Liberalism and very vague re-drawing of borders between governmental territory. Don't be surprised if there are a few international unification and separatist movements where small countries may merge or separate from or to larger ones, or that several countries might form some kind of protectionist block.
We can expect Regionalism and geographically disparate wars to start taking place. It will not be impossible to see something like a war between Poland and India take place across 3 continents and 15 countries. Due to Geographic, Political, Economic, and Cultural advantages, we are likely to get yet another American century, if the Canadians keep fucking up and don't take it for themselves due to their incredible advantages. India and Russia are likely to do better this century, but they've got innumerable problems. China is far worse off than anyone realizes, and I don't think a Civil War is impossible.
Europe? Do see any chance for northern Europe (where the infection is quite deep)?
You're not thinking broad enough for Regionalism. I mean regionalism as in: India, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Paraguay, and Switzerland have an economic alliance. Regional coalitions internationally; but I think "devolution" of federal governments into more republican systems may also happen in parts of Europe.
I think its due both, slight mental problem that helps one to grind into microscopic though bubble, then living in that though bubble refusing to ever expand it leaves you with tons of mental issues
My guess is result. For all that they claim the right live on fearmongering, they're all about being perpetually scared that heretics racists are everywhere and any one of your friends could be one.
99% of what we call mental illness is just an excuse to get out of being held responsible for anything - which is why 100% of women have "mental illnesses"
Considering that CRT is pretty deeply embedded in the left... and that CRT is rabidly anti-white... I might just go ahead and say that being a white liberal is a mental illness, in and of itself. Subscribing to an ideology where you hate yourself that much....
I'm still convinced a lot of them like to just say they have a mental illness because they think it's cool to have one, because that somehow makes them brave and strong. Which ironically enough ends up kind of manifesting one.
This is their eternal cope.
This is probably not wrong, though.
In the liberal culture, mental illnesses are pretty much seen as badges of honor. They go in the Twitter bio next to the pronouns. They give you victimhood points, and a diagnosis can give you an edge in school so parents will get them for their kids. What's more, it seems to be a mortal sin to be milquetoast. It is a requirement to deviate in some way. A diagnosis given by a friendly doctor will help. You can even get pills.
Among nobody else is this the case. Liberals of other ethnicities can use that for victimhood points so don't really need a mental illness. Conservatives of course don't have mental illnesses at all, they have character flaws instead.
What we're seeing from the left right now is what happens when you turn victimhood into a virtue.
NO WAY! I always thought they were highly intelligent, stable and level-headed.
Now, I wonder: is their mental illness a cause or a result of their ideology? I assume it must be hard to smear your own race in order to pretend to be "one of the good ones".
No, but yes. It is the result of a system of industrial-scale, psychological and emotional abuse. This industrial-scale abuse is an outgrowth of an ideology of predators.
White Leftists are literally being driven insane by a political system that is intentionally making them emotionally dependent, highly sensitive, highly insecure, and constantly feeling victimized and violated.
The Social Justice Racket itself is a protection racket, that exists to cultivate dependent populations on the protection racket as a reliable source of both income and power to authoritarian minded personalities. Chief among these personalities are sociopaths and narcissists. Sociopaths are seeking power from populations they see as prey that deserve to be predated upon for being to weak to attack them, and narcissists are seeking to cultivate a dependent population that will constantly give them the attention and emotional affirmation that they are actually dependent on. The Sociopathic Narcissist is the predator who thrives most in the Social Justice Racket. They have the drive of affirmation that a narcissist has, but also have the ruthlessness to manipulate social environments to their advantage to cultivate that environment from their prey (or to simply cultivate normal people in to prey).
These abuse tactics and systems they develop are fairly standard among sociopaths and narcissists. The purpose is to create extreme social tension, along with disproportionate and random punishments from the predator, in order to use the prey's insecurity in social status as a weapon to manipulate behavior. Though I have said it before on Reddit, I will re-iterate their tactics:
Expansion of hunting grounds: Radicalization [predators] require a constant inflow of new recruits because prey can be easily exhausted in the predator's hunting ground. Without new inflows of prey, competition between predators will emerge and the environment will collapse as the predators destroy each other. The solution that the Social Justice Racket has come up with for this is to create a Ponzi Scheme of Predators. Each predator/abuser bringing in their own abuse system into the racket, while using the power of the racket to expand upwards. Of the prey that remain will be the prey that can be siphons who can be predated upon long term, and the subversive vassals who bring more prey into the killing fields.
Supplementing Community: When it comes to Social Justice in particular, the hunting grounds use the alure of a sense of community, identity, and emotional satisfaction to attract prey like zebra to a watering hole. This honest desire will be used as a weapon against the prey to cultivate them. In the case of Social Justice in particular, the predators that are most influential the prey's immediate social justice circles, will use very specific tactics to control his emotions which are listed below. This need for community, identity, and emotional satisfaction form the foundation of the killing fields. This what community looks like. Show them what community looks like.
Love-bombing: This is one of the ways the SJ hunting grounds indoctrinate people into thinking they have a loving and supporting community. People who make ideologically correct choices are supported by an enormous amount of emotional affirmation for making the morally right choice. Expect lots of compliments and statements of support. This is what the virtue signaling is for. People can easily start to get addicted to this, and the point. The addiction cultivates a dependency on the predator, and the prey can no longer self-affirm. This generates permanent insecurity, which creates permanent dependency.
Cognitive Overload: Once love-bombed into the hunting grounds, prey will be exposed to an absolute insane word salad of false epistemology that is designed confuse and de-moralize (see: Bezminov). This "cognitive overload" is useful in generating enough confusion and intellectual insecurity to make them susceptible to suggestion from both authority and peer pressure. Although most entire industries seek to reduce cognitive overload due to it's severe consequences, purely malicious actions (like a military unit flanking an enemy position) seek to introduce it. As a military unit seeks to introduce cognitive overload by panicking enemy soldiers into inducing a route, the Social Justice predators introduce cognitive overload to introduce suggestibility to new recruits, as well as a feeling of inadequacy and incompetence among the herd. "I have a lot to learn."
De-individuation: As the prey gets more dependent on the emotional affirmation, they may confront the cognitive overload. The suggestibility of social pressure makes them abandon their own intellectual mechanisms as they are given authority figures, and social groups, that will make decisions for them to reduce the cognitive load that has been introduced. This reliance on affirmation and load reduction begins the process of deindividuating the prey to the herd, and allowing the collective to replace their own judgement, even regarding themselves. Emotional Incontinence and demands of zero boundaries mean that social judgement and stigma replace even private decisions. Every time he follows the instructions of the herd, they will re-affirm his decision as morally right. Making individual choices confers uncomfortable levels of responsibility as the dependency weakens him and as he is not actually the predator moving the herd along, and doesn't want to stick out from the herd. The predator guiding the prey will claim to be the both intellectual and moral authority figure for the group's will as a whole, and will also claim the highest level of victimhood (due to the social status this provides). This can normally be reinforced in media and academia.
Unique knowledge & self-doubt: The prey's cognitive overload comes in neigh-on-indecipherable ideologies like Critical Race Theory, Social Justice, Neo-Marxism, Post-Modernism, and Feminist Philosophy.This is the creation of a false epistemology that is nothing more than a performative display of intellectual authority. The prey will be conditioned to say and accept absurd reductionist claims from authority figures asserting unique knowledge, to alleviate the cognitive overload discussed previously. The reduction of this stress makes these reductions an emotional imperative both to himself and the group. These reductions become incantation for the group to recite. Disruption and dissent from these incantations both increases the cognitive overload, and challenges the social ordering being cultivated by the predator (which would result in a loss of social status and support systems). Thus, the incantations will be rationalized by everyone around him while the 'authority figures' (again, his local leaders, academics, or the press) so that he won't feel like he said something stupid, but is "virtue signaling" his obedience. He will be loved bombed for repeating these mantras in public. Things like "women have penises", "blacks can't be racist", "socialism/communism was never tried", "Kavanaugh is going to kill thousands of women", "you're either a feminist or your a sexist", "Transwomen are women", "Love is Love", "Trust the Science". Dissent from these reductionist statements will not be tolerated. This is the implementation of a totalitarian moral code on the herd in the hunting grounds.
Egg-shells: Hypersensitivity, paranoia, and outrage cultivation: To keep the prey from coming to unacceptable conclusions, the rules that he's operating under will be constantly changing. This creates perpetual cognitive overload. New vocabulary will be subtracted and added by local leadership to maintain control under victims who are confused and perpetually disoriented by the Byzantine rules. This forces the victims to rely, perpetually, on group response and local leadership. This is actually a very common tactic in long-term interrogations by military forces (Make the prisoner dependent on the interrogator). Additionally, they will be made hypersensitive to specific stimuli through conditioning. Forcing people to be constantly upset and outraged as part of performative actions in response to triggering material in the media, or presented by leadership as political objectives (see: Trump Derangement Syndrome). After that is the paranoia, which further increases the sensitivity and reliance on local leadership.
Hate bombing: The moment the prey violates any one of these rules, he will be met with this. A veritable lynch mob of his own friends, associates, co-workers, and even family shaming him, degrading him, humiliating him, and belittling him. The prey will be made emotionally unstable because he will be taken to the highest of the highs with love bombing and the lowest of the lows with hate bombing. The only way for the prey to save itself is to the have an extreme reaction of abject sorrow to his abusers and literally beg for their forgiveness and mercy and to implicate another. They will show the prey only the smallest margin of tolerance and let everyone else know that he is on a razor's edge (further destabilizing him emotionally and psychologically). He will be like an addict who has learned that whenever he does the wrong thing, his friends and family will make him go through withdraw, and then give him a little bit of emotional security back before he actually breaks free of the manipulation. These experiences will be traumatic to watch if he sees them and worse to go through. On the other hand, if he is lucky enough to participate in the hate bombing, his aggression is rewarded with further affirmation. This is the purpose of struggle sessions and lynchings: not only to scape-goat, but to serve as a virtue signal by the other prey who seek to use this as an opportunity to gain emotional security. Everyone who doesn't participate in the lynching will be punished. And since everyone participated in the lynching, if there is ever vengeance or retaliation for the lynching, everyone is complicit in the crime, making them loyal to the one predator who organized it. Saddam did something similar when he killed part of the ba'ath party by having a number of it's members shoot the ones he wanted dead. "Abu Udi, we are with you!"
Social Isolation: The prey is now surrounded by constant emotional reactions. Life outside the hunting grounds includes a litany of pavlovian style triggers that he he has been conditioned for him to respond to. He'll bark at you when you say, "tranny". It will become very difficult for him to operate in normal society because he's been too conditioned, and normal society won't love bomb him like he's grown used to. He's lost the necessary emotional stoicism, self-confidence, and individualism that is necessary to exist in the world. He's trying to deal with the hate bombing he's doing to himself in his own head, because he's internalized his predator's moral imperatives. Since no one else is in the cult, no one else understands what's happening to him, and might even make fun of him for his hypersensitivity. It will be all be seen as a betrayal, and when he goes back to the group, they will agree that the "toxic" people in his life will be cut out.
End of part one..
That's the most thorough analysis I've seen of the progressive social order, doubleplus good.
I've been thinking about this since 2014. A lot of my perceptions from my own experiences with life and abuse have gone into it. I was truly horrified when I started to actually understand what was happening as an industrial system of regular abuse.
This is why I fear a proper genocide, and don't tolerate the National Socialists. The Holocaust was an industrial system of murder that emerged from a similar system of industrial abuse. Same with the Soviet Union's industrial mechanism of abuse as well.
It all only goes in one bad direction. Luckily, I think the system has become so unstable that they won't be able to achieve it. I expect relatively few casualties, as when the USSR collapsed.
I don't think our elites are capable of utilizing violence properly, which makes a genocide difficult for them. Antifa demonstrates this well in that their violence is pretty shit even when given total carte blanche. The GAE is exclusively run by foxes and they don't understand the nature of lions. Samuel T Francis's book Leviathan & It's Enemies is an excellent culmination of elite theory and digs into the differences between the soft managerial regime of the poz and the hard managerial regimes of the Nazis/Soviets.
I agree with that. They have no real hard power, so a proper genocide is likely out, just anachro-tryanny.
There's also the fact that they still have enough access to do very stupid things with the limited hard power that they have.
I don't think for one moment that Kamalla Harris or Nancy Pelosi wouldn't tell a National Guard or Capitol Police unit to fire an M240 machine gun on a crowd of unarmed people.
Now, that would work about as well for them as it did Ceaușescu, but it can still happen.
They don't need hard power. They can genocide you with economic and psychological warfare. They can destroy your borders and your nations, your cultures and your peoples, without firing a shot. In the end, your way of life is just as gone.
I think you're correct that the current rainbow regime is incompetent and unsustainable. I also think that the inevitable collapse of this regime is fully capable of taking a number of peoples, cultures, and nations with it. I don't count that as a victory. We need affirmative defenses, and that means asserting our rights to exist and thrive along national, cultural, and racial/ethnic lines.
Note that this is not a supremacy doctrine. No one, left or right, would deny such rights to any non-white demographic. Such behavior is exclusively forbidden to whites, and this is a direct result of the industrial psychological abuse you have identified. That abuse targets precisely one racial demographic, yes? I mean go accuse an Asian, an Hispanic, or a black person of racism. Do they internalize it? Does it impact their behavior or mental well-being in the slightest?
That's just not true, and even a white identitarian like yourself should know that since "White Flight" is a well known thing.
Genocide economically is just not reliable, as your best case scenario is Iran. So long as any government allows enough of a free market to get around international financial restrictions, they're fine. UN sanctions don't do shit, they need proper hard power.
Genocide through psychological warfare is also not enough. Honestly, this has been my biggest complaint with Christians who relied on the government to maintain and institutionalize Christianity. You can't tell me that Burger King and MasterCard have a total hold on your psychology when you have a fucking church you go to every single weekend. Resistance to psychological warfare is already here, and christ almighty, that's basically us.
If you can resist psychological warfare by being an internet shitlord, then they've got their work cut out for them.
As I said before the Fabian Socialists victories, indeed all Leftist victories, come from seizing keystone positions of power. This is why Lennin, even just before his death, was whining that "private capitalism" proved nearly impossible to actually control. There was always some blackmarket that would sprout up somewhere, and even though he had total control of every institution, and it was relatively easy to bring every elite class into the Communist fold (even the militarists, aristocracy, landed gentry, intellectuals, and industrialists), it was the proletariat that remained the most staunchly reactionary force of all, and they just wouldn't come along.
The preservation of your communities, whatever they may be, relies on courage of conviction, maintaining and developing those principles, and actually building strong social networks. All they can do after that is try to shoot everyone, and that always has diminishing returns.
You don't kill the beast, you starve it.
Look how many people dies from the collapse of the Soviet Union and International Communism. By global measures, practically fucking no one. Even the collapse of European Monarchies had slightly fewer deaths. Most of the deaths of populations came from the expansion of Globalism, and Socialism. The Fabian Order has no chance of killing millions. I'd be way more worried about the likely deaths from a Chinese Civil War, than the collapse of the West.
I don't reject that whites are being explicitly targeted by Black National Socialism at the moment. My problem is that you can't unify around a mechanism which is inherently Leftist and guarantees that keystone position of power to seize.
I'm not going to cry when ComputingForever advocates for the Irish ethnicity not to be dissolved by Fabian Colonialsim, nor when Sargoy Of Applebees advocates for the English to be respected as an aboriginal people to England. But you can't simply assert that an ethnic protection racket is going to protect you from Leftism when those very same ethnic protection rackets are often fostered by Leftists to promote Socialism over and over again. Africa is littered with this kind of shit.
You are more than welcome to oppose Fabian Colonialism and it's importation of foreign slaves into your country, but you can't use an authoritarian system especially a Leftist systems to protect you. You are walking the fox right into the hen house and calling it a rooster. These ideologies are Leftism with a Right-Wing aesthetic because the Leftists know how unpalatable they are.
And of course, pushing for ethnic protection only works in places that are already ethno-states like you have in Europe. America is a wholly different situation because it is, and always has been, a Civic Nation. To be honest, that's a better situation because Communists can't hide behind ethnic claims to defend themselves, they instead have to lie profusely that they don't want a violent revolution against the Civic order.
To defeat Leftism you need decentralized systems of power, meaning Republicanism. Additionally, to prevent Leftists from dominating government structures generally, which you need Liberalism to distrust government coercion and promote heavy suspicion of the government. After that, you need free-market economics to help promote a culture of voluntary interaction between people; which robs the Left of their claims that theft is a necessary act for "justice" as no contract has been violated. Adding on a decentralized religion only reinforces the cultural protections.
But these are all things antithetical to National Socialism and Fascism. They are also generally antithetical to White Nationalism because you are still advocating for a government system that creates a protection racket, which is exactly what will be exploited. This is why we have watched damn near all right-wing authoritarian governments not only fall to Leftism, but be fucking inundated by Leftism.
I think you're completely ignoring the fact that both war and violence have evolved since 1940. The elites aren't capable of true physical violence anymore because they don't need it. The tools for economic and psychological warfare have advanced to the point where traditional violence is basically obsolete. The government doesn't need to kill you when it can simply snuff out your ability to communicate, organize, fund raise, etc. And the moment you fight back with violence, the media frames you as the villain while the whole system comes down on you.
You've accepted the premises of the foxes. The Taliban, the IRA, the FARC, the Chechens, etc blast a hole in that boomer truth.
In this case, the national socialists are the only ones actively working against the genocide, and you don't "tolerate" them because you think their enemies are too incompetent to complete that genocide.
Wut?
No, the National Socialists are never not working towards a genocide, that is the purpose of their revolutionary racial communism.
It's why Black Lives Matter isn't going to be peaceful. They are Black National Socialists.
None of them should be tolerated.
Have you considered expanding it a bit each day and seeing if it turns into a book?
... i may or may not be working on one...
If I was, you'd probably recognize the writing style pretty quick.
I'll keep an eye out for it. It's a fine line between making something overly detailed and losing people with keeping the requisite history and info in there and your posts do it well.
Fantastic, can we subscribe to get part 2 when it's out?
Instead of saying I'd give you gold, I'll tell you that I saved this post to my personal archive.
I just posted it.
Thabks, I came to say something along these lines, but you clearly nailed it.
When you look at white liberals as the victims (albeit willing) of the system you describe, their actions make perfect sense. They've abandoned individuality for the power and protection of the group without fully understanding what they've gotten themselves in to.
That's why facts and logic are useless against them, they're in a subjective group reality where truth is maleable.
Any ideas for breaking them loose? I feel there may be opportunities when they cancel one of their own, but often their twice as dedicated after their public shaming. I'm leaning towards the idea that anyone already in is already a write off so we should concentrate everything on bringing up the next generation with an actual community which should prevent them from falling for the decoy.
They are emotional addicts. They need to hit rock bottom and realize that they can't keep doing what they are doing.
I'm not saying "punch a Leftist", I'm saying that you have to make them directly feel the impact of their decisions, then you have to offer individualism and responsibility as an alternative. The difficulty is that taking responsibility is scary, but the collective punishment of the group is also scary; so you have to figure out how to teach them to take responsibility while it's clear that trusting the group with responsibility is a bad idea.
So, for example, say you are dealing with an environmentalist. They are probably clamoring about some sort of virtue signaling bullshit about how their Prius will save the world. You can present all sorts of personal initiatives to them, and focus on ones that involve personal responsibility. Like gardening, soil management, and water management for their home. They are used to just making consumer choices that are validated by the group, but your points about taking personal initiative sound like good ideas (but they are normally just to lazy). You could probably even start out as small as having them grow their own herbs and going to farmers markets (which are normally filled to the limit with Trump supporters, make some excuses about "raw foods" and "locally grown, sustainable, organic, agriculture"). Another idea is to grow trees! Hippies love trees and shit! If they like flowers, suggest a "Bee Pollinator Corridor".
Eventually, the group is going to do something fucking retarded and demand she be executed for not attending a protest or something. Maybe she brought the wrong brand of LeCrox. It doesn't matter, the lynchers will come out.
Use that opportunity to show that she's actually doing the work of land/soil/water/wild-life management, and all these other people are just posers who are virtue-signaling. Meanwhile she has the rain-garden to prove that she manages her own water run-off.
That's just it: Leftists can't build anything. You will have taught her to build something that is still emotionally aligned with her ideology. However, you have subverted the Leftism by teaching her how to build and maintain a thing, and how to have a long time preference. That virtue signaling to the group isn't as important as actually doing stuff, and that her personal success is more important, tangible, and permanent than the group's love-bombing.
Right wing subversion doesn't have to start off with yelling "The John Birch Society Did Nothing Wrong", just as Leftism doesn't start with "Luxury Space Communism Now!" They start the subversion by talking about "rights" and "equality". Start your right-wing subversion with "responsibility" and "individual initiative".
The point is to then do this repeatedly, so that you build their individualism and self-confidence; so that they learn to distrust their previously cherished sources of information and affirmation.
There are those that are truly predators that we can't reach, but they are fewer in number than we think. Maybe, like, 10-20%
Getting people as they age is actually the easier success story. However, we absolutely have to take the initiative to young people.
It's why we can't stop gaming. We can't reach fucking anyone who is young through traditional means. Gaming clans and competitions have to be a priority. If we can provide them with anti-Left recreational social outlets, that will be more than enough to blunt the effect of Leftism on the Zoomers because they will be moving rightward as they age.
Personally, I think Halo Infinite and Pokemon are excellent opportunities. There seems to be a lot of hype around these games, and given our age, we can still interact with the franchise well enough. We can be the rightist alternative to soyboy game journos crying over their switches.
Beginning of Part 2:
Not only are all of these tactics present personally. But the crime of this century, is that multiple governments and multiple industries have structured themselves in turning these abuse systems into industrial mechanism to ensure power and control over populations. Social Media, especially Twitter, has turned into a mechanism for these predators: a new hunting ground. It's gamificaiton has made the psychological abuse incentivized through both monetary and social status means. Traditional media has adopted these methods that we first saw in GamerGate used on a mass scale against entire populations. Governments have seen the value in these abuse systems and are now currently promoting these abuse systems with the help of both traditional and social media into crafting new forms of totalitarianism using Covid as an excuse.
The adoption of this abuse hasn't stopped because these abuse systems are effective, and the Ponzi Scheme Predators have expanded their sphere of influence in to damn near every industry they can get ahold of. Those seeking control and dominance of their industries are also promoting it either because they themselves have been ideologically possessed through these same methods, or they have decided that the predation is the most optimal way of controlling the marketplace; which has led us not only to Academia and Media using these methods, but banks as well.
It must be the fight of our lives to resist and break against these institutions that have adopted industrialized mechanisms of mass psychological abuse.
And before you get all black pilled, let me remind you that these ponzi schems can't survive their own perpetual expansion. Their expansion is indicative of their failure. The wider the Ponzi Scheme grows, the more unstable it becomes.
I'm not a religious man, but those of you who are, may understand why I would say this passage is so important right now:
Courage of conviction and principle must be met against the hordes of this industrialized Evil and it's paymasters. Their collapse is inevitable, and thus our victory is assured. The issue merely whether we are ready for that collapse or not, and whether we will ensure the collapse by never succumbing to the expansion of this manifestation of Hell. It is a power-bubble, and it must collapse if it can't expand.
Be the pinecone in the forest fire.
Here I thought you would go with this, but perhaps it is a bit to aggressive.
So will part 3 deal with the aftermath? and have you done any further pondering upon the bond based system? Would it be viable to start implementing it on a smaller scale in order to get a running alternative system set up? And will all the government hardware go to computer hell ? (/s on the last question).
Oh, you mean my anthem?
No, it was just less pertinent to my point.
I may or may not have been blaring that in traffic in my car.
You'll have to give me a while to respond to that properly.
Longstory short. People should be a lot more white-pilled than they are. I believe that the 21st century is actually when Liberalism is actually going to emerge naturally among human populations, as 17th century Liberalism was a strange almost England specific fluke of history and geography. Human Commodification had been the norm, and Liberalism was a strange blowback to that which happened to occur in the three places where it could thrive almost uncontested: Britain, France, and the US.
The Era of Human Commodification is coming to an end, and decentralizes Liberal-Like and Republican systems are going to emerge over the coming century which corresponds to the continuing rise of decentralized firepower, with little corresponding rise in defensive technology. AI, drones, anti-ship missiles, miniaturization of railguns, it's all going away from centralized control.
We can expect Regionalism and geographically disparate wars to start taking place. It will not be impossible to see something like a war between Poland and India take place across 3 continents and 15 countries. Due to Geographic, Political, Economic, and Cultural advantages, we are likely to get yet another American century, if the Canadians keep fucking up and don't take it for themselves due to their incredible advantages. India and Russia are likely to do better this century, but they've got innumerable problems. China is far worse off than anyone realizes, and I don't think a Civil War is impossible.
Genuinely Libertarian systems like what I've mentioned may emerge, but it's hard to get them running since there isn't a lot of bedrock to build them up from. I wouldn't be surprised if we found genuine Libertarian governments emerge at least within the US and in a handful of other places scattered around the globe. More likely we will see a kind of managed Liberalism and very vague re-drawing of borders between governmental territory. Don't be surprised if there are a few international unification and separatist movements where small countries may merge or separate from or to larger ones, or that several countries might form some kind of protectionist block.
Europe? Do see any chance for northern Europe (where the infection is quite deep)?
And no worries about taking time to respond.
You're not thinking broad enough for Regionalism. I mean regionalism as in: India, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Paraguay, and Switzerland have an economic alliance. Regional coalitions internationally; but I think "devolution" of federal governments into more republican systems may also happen in parts of Europe.
I think its due both, slight mental problem that helps one to grind into microscopic though bubble, then living in that though bubble refusing to ever expand it leaves you with tons of mental issues
My guess is result. For all that they claim the right live on fearmongering, they're all about being perpetually scared that
hereticsracists are everywhere and any one of your friends could be one.Plus there's the addiction to righteous outrage.
I think its a result of the constant explaining and doublthinking that is inherent in modern liberalism. ie
kids in cages is BAD! vote him out!
but now that biden does it, thats ok now.
some "mental illness" is real
99% of what we call mental illness is just an excuse to get out of being held responsible for anything - which is why 100% of women have "mental illnesses"
Considering that CRT is pretty deeply embedded in the left... and that CRT is rabidly anti-white... I might just go ahead and say that being a white liberal is a mental illness, in and of itself. Subscribing to an ideology where you hate yourself that much....
What was he right about?
I'm still convinced a lot of them like to just say they have a mental illness because they think it's cool to have one, because that somehow makes them brave and strong. Which ironically enough ends up kind of manifesting one.