I've been thinking about this since 2014. A lot of my perceptions from my own experiences with life and abuse have gone into it. I was truly horrified when I started to actually understand what was happening as an industrial system of regular abuse.
This is why I fear a proper genocide, and don't tolerate the National Socialists. The Holocaust was an industrial system of murder that emerged from a similar system of industrial abuse. Same with the Soviet Union's industrial mechanism of abuse as well.
It all only goes in one bad direction. Luckily, I think the system has become so unstable that they won't be able to achieve it. I expect relatively few casualties, as when the USSR collapsed.
I don't think our elites are capable of utilizing violence properly, which makes a genocide difficult for them. Antifa demonstrates this well in that their violence is pretty shit even when given total carte blanche. The GAE is exclusively run by foxes and they don't understand the nature of lions. Samuel T Francis's book Leviathan & It's Enemies is an excellent culmination of elite theory and digs into the differences between the soft managerial regime of the poz and the hard managerial regimes of the Nazis/Soviets.
I agree with that. They have no real hard power, so a proper genocide is likely out, just anachro-tryanny.
There's also the fact that they still have enough access to do very stupid things with the limited hard power that they have.
I don't think for one moment that Kamalla Harris or Nancy Pelosi wouldn't tell a National Guard or Capitol Police unit to fire an M240 machine gun on a crowd of unarmed people.
Now, that would work about as well for them as it did Ceaușescu, but it can still happen.
They don't need hard power. They can genocide you with economic and psychological warfare. They can destroy your borders and your nations, your cultures and your peoples, without firing a shot. In the end, your way of life is just as gone.
I think you're correct that the current rainbow regime is incompetent and unsustainable. I also think that the inevitable collapse of this regime is fully capable of taking a number of peoples, cultures, and nations with it. I don't count that as a victory. We need affirmative defenses, and that means asserting our rights to exist and thrive along national, cultural, and racial/ethnic lines.
Note that this is not a supremacy doctrine. No one, left or right, would deny such rights to any non-white demographic. Such behavior is exclusively forbidden to whites, and this is a direct result of the industrial psychological abuse you have identified. That abuse targets precisely one racial demographic, yes? I mean go accuse an Asian, an Hispanic, or a black person of racism. Do they internalize it? Does it impact their behavior or mental well-being in the slightest?
They can genocide you with economic and psychological warfare. They can destroy your borders and your nations, your cultures and your peoples, without firing a shot. In the end, your way of life is just as gone.
That's just not true, and even a white identitarian like yourself should know that since "White Flight" is a well known thing.
Genocide economically is just not reliable, as your best case scenario is Iran. So long as any government allows enough of a free market to get around international financial restrictions, they're fine. UN sanctions don't do shit, they need proper hard power.
Genocide through psychological warfare is also not enough. Honestly, this has been my biggest complaint with Christians who relied on the government to maintain and institutionalize Christianity. You can't tell me that Burger King and MasterCard have a total hold on your psychology when you have a fucking church you go to every single weekend. Resistance to psychological warfare is already here, and christ almighty, that's basically us.
If you can resist psychological warfare by being an internet shitlord, then they've got their work cut out for them.
As I said before the Fabian Socialists victories, indeed all Leftist victories, come from seizing keystone positions of power. This is why Lennin, even just before his death, was whining that "private capitalism" proved nearly impossible to actually control. There was always some blackmarket that would sprout up somewhere, and even though he had total control of every institution, and it was relatively easy to bring every elite class into the Communist fold (even the militarists, aristocracy, landed gentry, intellectuals, and industrialists), it was the proletariat that remained the most staunchly reactionary force of all, and they just wouldn't come along.
The preservation of your communities, whatever they may be, relies on courage of conviction, maintaining and developing those principles, and actually building strong social networks. All they can do after that is try to shoot everyone, and that always has diminishing returns.
You don't kill the beast, you starve it.
I think you're correct that the current rainbow regime is incompetent and unsustainable. I also think that the inevitable collapse of this regime is fully capable of taking a number of peoples, cultures, and nations with it. I don't count that as a victory.
Look how many people dies from the collapse of the Soviet Union and International Communism. By global measures, practically fucking no one. Even the collapse of European Monarchies had slightly fewer deaths. Most of the deaths of populations came from the expansion of Globalism, and Socialism. The Fabian Order has no chance of killing millions. I'd be way more worried about the likely deaths from a Chinese Civil War, than the collapse of the West.
Such behavior is exclusively forbidden to whites, and this is a direct result of the industrial psychological abuse you have identified. That abuse targets precisely one racial demographic, yes? I mean go accuse an Asian, an Hispanic, or a black person of racism. Do they internalize it? Does it impact their behavior or mental well-being in the slightest?
I don't reject that whites are being explicitly targeted by Black National Socialism at the moment. My problem is that you can't unify around a mechanism which is inherently Leftist and guarantees that keystone position of power to seize.
I'm not going to cry when ComputingForever advocates for the Irish ethnicity not to be dissolved by Fabian Colonialsim, nor when Sargoy Of Applebees advocates for the English to be respected as an aboriginal people to England. But you can't simply assert that an ethnic protection racket is going to protect you from Leftism when those very same ethnic protection rackets are often fostered by Leftists to promote Socialism over and over again. Africa is littered with this kind of shit.
You are more than welcome to oppose Fabian Colonialism and it's importation of foreign slaves into your country, but you can't use an authoritarian system especially a Leftist systems to protect you. You are walking the fox right into the hen house and calling it a rooster. These ideologies are Leftism with a Right-Wing aesthetic because the Leftists know how unpalatable they are.
And of course, pushing for ethnic protection only works in places that are already ethno-states like you have in Europe. America is a wholly different situation because it is, and always has been, a Civic Nation. To be honest, that's a better situation because Communists can't hide behind ethnic claims to defend themselves, they instead have to lie profusely that they don't want a violent revolution against the Civic order.
To defeat Leftism you need decentralized systems of power, meaning Republicanism. Additionally, to prevent Leftists from dominating government structures generally, which you need Liberalism to distrust government coercion and promote heavy suspicion of the government. After that, you need free-market economics to help promote a culture of voluntary interaction between people; which robs the Left of their claims that theft is a necessary act for "justice" as no contract has been violated. Adding on a decentralized religion only reinforces the cultural protections.
But these are all things antithetical to National Socialism and Fascism. They are also generally antithetical to White Nationalism because you are still advocating for a government system that creates a protection racket, which is exactly what will be exploited. This is why we have watched damn near all right-wing authoritarian governments not only fall to Leftism, but be fucking inundated by Leftism.
I think you're completely ignoring the fact that both war and violence have evolved since 1940. The elites aren't capable of true physical violence anymore because they don't need it. The tools for economic and psychological warfare have advanced to the point where traditional violence is basically obsolete. The government doesn't need to kill you when it can simply snuff out your ability to communicate, organize, fund raise, etc. And the moment you fight back with violence, the media frames you as the villain while the whole system comes down on you.
This is why I fear a proper genocide, and don't tolerate the National Socialists.
In this case, the national socialists are the only ones actively working against the genocide, and you don't "tolerate" them because you think their enemies are too incompetent to complete that genocide.
I'll keep an eye out for it. It's a fine line between making something overly detailed and losing people with keeping the requisite history and info in there and your posts do it well.
I've been thinking about this since 2014. A lot of my perceptions from my own experiences with life and abuse have gone into it. I was truly horrified when I started to actually understand what was happening as an industrial system of regular abuse.
This is why I fear a proper genocide, and don't tolerate the National Socialists. The Holocaust was an industrial system of murder that emerged from a similar system of industrial abuse. Same with the Soviet Union's industrial mechanism of abuse as well.
It all only goes in one bad direction. Luckily, I think the system has become so unstable that they won't be able to achieve it. I expect relatively few casualties, as when the USSR collapsed.
I don't think our elites are capable of utilizing violence properly, which makes a genocide difficult for them. Antifa demonstrates this well in that their violence is pretty shit even when given total carte blanche. The GAE is exclusively run by foxes and they don't understand the nature of lions. Samuel T Francis's book Leviathan & It's Enemies is an excellent culmination of elite theory and digs into the differences between the soft managerial regime of the poz and the hard managerial regimes of the Nazis/Soviets.
I agree with that. They have no real hard power, so a proper genocide is likely out, just anachro-tryanny.
There's also the fact that they still have enough access to do very stupid things with the limited hard power that they have.
I don't think for one moment that Kamalla Harris or Nancy Pelosi wouldn't tell a National Guard or Capitol Police unit to fire an M240 machine gun on a crowd of unarmed people.
Now, that would work about as well for them as it did Ceaușescu, but it can still happen.
They don't need hard power. They can genocide you with economic and psychological warfare. They can destroy your borders and your nations, your cultures and your peoples, without firing a shot. In the end, your way of life is just as gone.
I think you're correct that the current rainbow regime is incompetent and unsustainable. I also think that the inevitable collapse of this regime is fully capable of taking a number of peoples, cultures, and nations with it. I don't count that as a victory. We need affirmative defenses, and that means asserting our rights to exist and thrive along national, cultural, and racial/ethnic lines.
Note that this is not a supremacy doctrine. No one, left or right, would deny such rights to any non-white demographic. Such behavior is exclusively forbidden to whites, and this is a direct result of the industrial psychological abuse you have identified. That abuse targets precisely one racial demographic, yes? I mean go accuse an Asian, an Hispanic, or a black person of racism. Do they internalize it? Does it impact their behavior or mental well-being in the slightest?
That's just not true, and even a white identitarian like yourself should know that since "White Flight" is a well known thing.
Genocide economically is just not reliable, as your best case scenario is Iran. So long as any government allows enough of a free market to get around international financial restrictions, they're fine. UN sanctions don't do shit, they need proper hard power.
Genocide through psychological warfare is also not enough. Honestly, this has been my biggest complaint with Christians who relied on the government to maintain and institutionalize Christianity. You can't tell me that Burger King and MasterCard have a total hold on your psychology when you have a fucking church you go to every single weekend. Resistance to psychological warfare is already here, and christ almighty, that's basically us.
If you can resist psychological warfare by being an internet shitlord, then they've got their work cut out for them.
As I said before the Fabian Socialists victories, indeed all Leftist victories, come from seizing keystone positions of power. This is why Lennin, even just before his death, was whining that "private capitalism" proved nearly impossible to actually control. There was always some blackmarket that would sprout up somewhere, and even though he had total control of every institution, and it was relatively easy to bring every elite class into the Communist fold (even the militarists, aristocracy, landed gentry, intellectuals, and industrialists), it was the proletariat that remained the most staunchly reactionary force of all, and they just wouldn't come along.
The preservation of your communities, whatever they may be, relies on courage of conviction, maintaining and developing those principles, and actually building strong social networks. All they can do after that is try to shoot everyone, and that always has diminishing returns.
You don't kill the beast, you starve it.
Look how many people dies from the collapse of the Soviet Union and International Communism. By global measures, practically fucking no one. Even the collapse of European Monarchies had slightly fewer deaths. Most of the deaths of populations came from the expansion of Globalism, and Socialism. The Fabian Order has no chance of killing millions. I'd be way more worried about the likely deaths from a Chinese Civil War, than the collapse of the West.
I don't reject that whites are being explicitly targeted by Black National Socialism at the moment. My problem is that you can't unify around a mechanism which is inherently Leftist and guarantees that keystone position of power to seize.
I'm not going to cry when ComputingForever advocates for the Irish ethnicity not to be dissolved by Fabian Colonialsim, nor when Sargoy Of Applebees advocates for the English to be respected as an aboriginal people to England. But you can't simply assert that an ethnic protection racket is going to protect you from Leftism when those very same ethnic protection rackets are often fostered by Leftists to promote Socialism over and over again. Africa is littered with this kind of shit.
You are more than welcome to oppose Fabian Colonialism and it's importation of foreign slaves into your country, but you can't use an authoritarian system especially a Leftist systems to protect you. You are walking the fox right into the hen house and calling it a rooster. These ideologies are Leftism with a Right-Wing aesthetic because the Leftists know how unpalatable they are.
And of course, pushing for ethnic protection only works in places that are already ethno-states like you have in Europe. America is a wholly different situation because it is, and always has been, a Civic Nation. To be honest, that's a better situation because Communists can't hide behind ethnic claims to defend themselves, they instead have to lie profusely that they don't want a violent revolution against the Civic order.
To defeat Leftism you need decentralized systems of power, meaning Republicanism. Additionally, to prevent Leftists from dominating government structures generally, which you need Liberalism to distrust government coercion and promote heavy suspicion of the government. After that, you need free-market economics to help promote a culture of voluntary interaction between people; which robs the Left of their claims that theft is a necessary act for "justice" as no contract has been violated. Adding on a decentralized religion only reinforces the cultural protections.
But these are all things antithetical to National Socialism and Fascism. They are also generally antithetical to White Nationalism because you are still advocating for a government system that creates a protection racket, which is exactly what will be exploited. This is why we have watched damn near all right-wing authoritarian governments not only fall to Leftism, but be fucking inundated by Leftism.
I think you're completely ignoring the fact that both war and violence have evolved since 1940. The elites aren't capable of true physical violence anymore because they don't need it. The tools for economic and psychological warfare have advanced to the point where traditional violence is basically obsolete. The government doesn't need to kill you when it can simply snuff out your ability to communicate, organize, fund raise, etc. And the moment you fight back with violence, the media frames you as the villain while the whole system comes down on you.
You've accepted the premises of the foxes. The Taliban, the IRA, the FARC, the Chechens, etc blast a hole in that boomer truth.
In this case, the national socialists are the only ones actively working against the genocide, and you don't "tolerate" them because you think their enemies are too incompetent to complete that genocide.
Wut?
No, the National Socialists are never not working towards a genocide, that is the purpose of their revolutionary racial communism.
It's why Black Lives Matter isn't going to be peaceful. They are Black National Socialists.
None of them should be tolerated.
Have you considered expanding it a bit each day and seeing if it turns into a book?
... i may or may not be working on one...
If I was, you'd probably recognize the writing style pretty quick.
I'll keep an eye out for it. It's a fine line between making something overly detailed and losing people with keeping the requisite history and info in there and your posts do it well.