No, but yes. It is the result of a system of industrial-scale, psychological and emotional abuse. This industrial-scale abuse is an outgrowth of an ideology of predators.
White Leftists are literally being driven insane by a political system that is intentionally making them emotionally dependent, highly sensitive, highly insecure, and constantly feeling victimized and violated.
The Social Justice Racket itself is a protection racket, that exists to cultivate dependent populations on the protection racket as a reliable source of both income and power to authoritarian minded personalities. Chief among these personalities are sociopaths and narcissists. Sociopaths are seeking power from populations they see as prey that deserve to be predated upon for being to weak to attack them, and narcissists are seeking to cultivate a dependent population that will constantly give them the attention and emotional affirmation that they are actually dependent on. The Sociopathic Narcissist is the predator who thrives most in the Social Justice Racket. They have the drive of affirmation that a narcissist has, but also have the ruthlessness to manipulate social environments to their advantage to cultivate that environment from their prey (or to simply cultivate normal people in to prey).
These abuse tactics and systems they develop are fairly standard among sociopaths and narcissists. The purpose is to create extreme social tension, along with disproportionate and random punishments from the predator, in order to use the prey's insecurity in social status as a weapon to manipulate behavior. Though I have said it before on Reddit, I will re-iterate their tactics:
Expansion of hunting grounds: Radicalization [predators] require a constant inflow of new recruits because prey can be easily exhausted in the predator's hunting ground. Without new inflows of prey, competition between predators will emerge and the environment will collapse as the predators destroy each other. The solution that the Social Justice Racket has come up with for this is to create a Ponzi Scheme of Predators. Each predator/abuser bringing in their own abuse system into the racket, while using the power of the racket to expand upwards. Of the prey that remain will be the prey that can be siphons who can be predated upon long term, and the subversive vassals who bring more prey into the killing fields.
Supplementing Community: When it comes to Social Justice in particular, the hunting grounds use the alure of a sense of community, identity, and emotional satisfaction to attract prey like zebra to a watering hole. This honest desire will be used as a weapon against the prey to cultivate them. In the case of Social Justice in particular, the predators that are most influential the prey's immediate social justice circles, will use very specific tactics to control his emotions which are listed below. This need for community, identity, and emotional satisfaction form the foundation of the killing fields. This what community looks like. Show them what community looks like.
Love-bombing: This is one of the ways the SJ hunting grounds indoctrinate people into thinking they have a loving and supporting community. People who make ideologically correct choices are supported by an enormous amount of emotional affirmation for making the morally right choice. Expect lots of compliments and statements of support. This is what the virtue signaling is for. People can easily start to get addicted to this, and the point. The addiction cultivates a dependency on the predator, and the prey can no longer self-affirm. This generates permanent insecurity, which creates permanent dependency.
Cognitive Overload: Once love-bombed into the hunting grounds, prey will be exposed to an absolute insane word salad of false epistemology that is designed confuse and de-moralize (see: Bezminov). This "cognitive overload" is useful in generating enough confusion and intellectual insecurity to make them susceptible to suggestion from both authority and peer pressure. Although most entire industries seek to reduce cognitive overload due to it's severe consequences, purely malicious actions (like a military unit flanking an enemy position) seek to introduce it. As a military unit seeks to introduce cognitive overload by panicking enemy soldiers into inducing a route, the Social Justice predators introduce cognitive overload to introduce suggestibility to new recruits, as well as a feeling of inadequacy and incompetence among the herd. "I have a lot to learn."
De-individuation: As the prey gets more dependent on the emotional affirmation, they may confront the cognitive overload. The suggestibility of social pressure makes them abandon their own intellectual mechanisms as they are given authority figures, and social groups, that will make decisions for them to reduce the cognitive load that has been introduced. This reliance on affirmation and load reduction begins the process of deindividuating the prey to the herd, and allowing the collective to replace their own judgement, even regarding themselves. Emotional Incontinence and demands of zero boundaries mean that social judgement and stigma replace even private decisions. Every time he follows the instructions of the herd, they will re-affirm his decision as morally right. Making individual choices confers uncomfortable levels of responsibility as the dependency weakens him and as he is not actually the predator moving the herd along, and doesn't want to stick out from the herd. The predator guiding the prey will claim to be the both intellectual and moral authority figure for the group's will as a whole, and will also claim the highest level of victimhood (due to the social status this provides). This can normally be reinforced in media and academia.
Unique knowledge & self-doubt: The prey's cognitive overload comes in neigh-on-indecipherable ideologies like Critical Race Theory, Social Justice, Neo-Marxism, Post-Modernism, and Feminist Philosophy.This is the creation of a false epistemology that is nothing more than a performative display of intellectual authority. The prey will be conditioned to say and accept absurd reductionist claims from authority figures asserting unique knowledge, to alleviate the cognitive overload discussed previously. The reduction of this stress makes these reductions an emotional imperative both to himself and the group. These reductions become incantation for the group to recite. Disruption and dissent from these incantations both increases the cognitive overload, and challenges the social ordering being cultivated by the predator (which would result in a loss of social status and support systems). Thus, the incantations will be rationalized by everyone around him while the 'authority figures' (again, his local leaders, academics, or the press) so that he won't feel like he said something stupid, but is "virtue signaling" his obedience. He will be loved bombed for repeating these mantras in public. Things like "women have penises", "blacks can't be racist", "socialism/communism was never tried", "Kavanaugh is going to kill thousands of women", "you're either a feminist or your a sexist", "Transwomen are women", "Love is Love", "Trust the Science". Dissent from these reductionist statements will not be tolerated. This is the implementation of a totalitarian moral code on the herd in the hunting grounds.
Egg-shells: Hypersensitivity, paranoia, and outrage cultivation: To keep the prey from coming to unacceptable conclusions, the rules that he's operating under will be constantly changing. This creates perpetual cognitive overload. New vocabulary will be subtracted and added by local leadership to maintain control under victims who are confused and perpetually disoriented by the Byzantine rules. This forces the victims to rely, perpetually, on group response and local leadership. This is actually a very common tactic in long-term interrogations by military forces (Make the prisoner dependent on the interrogator). Additionally, they will be made hypersensitive to specific stimuli through conditioning. Forcing people to be constantly upset and outraged as part of performative actions in response to triggering material in the media, or presented by leadership as political objectives (see: Trump Derangement Syndrome). After that is the paranoia, which further increases the sensitivity and reliance on local leadership.
Hate bombing: The moment the prey violates any one of these rules, he will be met with this. A veritable lynch mob of his own friends, associates, co-workers, and even family shaming him, degrading him, humiliating him, and belittling him. The prey will be made emotionally unstable because he will be taken to the highest of the highs with love bombing and the lowest of the lows with hate bombing. The only way for the prey to save itself is to the have an extreme reaction of abject sorrow to his abusers and literally beg for their forgiveness and mercy and to implicate another. They will show the prey only the smallest margin of tolerance and let everyone else know that he is on a razor's edge (further destabilizing him emotionally and psychologically). He will be like an addict who has learned that whenever he does the wrong thing, his friends and family will make him go through withdraw, and then give him a little bit of emotional security back before he actually breaks free of the manipulation. These experiences will be traumatic to watch if he sees them and worse to go through. On the other hand, if he is lucky enough to participate in the hate bombing, his aggression is rewarded with further affirmation. This is the purpose of struggle sessions and lynchings: not only to scape-goat, but to serve as a virtue signal by the other prey who seek to use this as an opportunity to gain emotional security. Everyone who doesn't participate in the lynching will be punished. And since everyone participated in the lynching, if there is ever vengeance or retaliation for the lynching, everyone is complicit in the crime, making them loyal to the one predator who organized it. Saddam did something similar when he killed part of the ba'ath party by having a number of it's members shoot the ones he wanted dead. "Abu Udi, we are with you!"
Social Isolation: The prey is now surrounded by constant emotional reactions. Life outside the hunting grounds includes a litany of pavlovian style triggers that he he has been conditioned for him to respond to. He'll bark at you when you say, "tranny". It will become very difficult for him to operate in normal society because he's been too conditioned, and normal society won't love bomb him like he's grown used to. He's lost the necessary emotional stoicism, self-confidence, and individualism that is necessary to exist in the world. He's trying to deal with the hate bombing he's doing to himself in his own head, because he's internalized his predator's moral imperatives. Since no one else is in the cult, no one else understands what's happening to him, and might even make fun of him for his hypersensitivity. It will be all be seen as a betrayal, and when he goes back to the group, they will agree that the "toxic" people in his life will be cut out.
I've been thinking about this since 2014. A lot of my perceptions from my own experiences with life and abuse have gone into it. I was truly horrified when I started to actually understand what was happening as an industrial system of regular abuse.
This is why I fear a proper genocide, and don't tolerate the National Socialists. The Holocaust was an industrial system of murder that emerged from a similar system of industrial abuse. Same with the Soviet Union's industrial mechanism of abuse as well.
It all only goes in one bad direction. Luckily, I think the system has become so unstable that they won't be able to achieve it. I expect relatively few casualties, as when the USSR collapsed.
I don't think our elites are capable of utilizing violence properly, which makes a genocide difficult for them. Antifa demonstrates this well in that their violence is pretty shit even when given total carte blanche. The GAE is exclusively run by foxes and they don't understand the nature of lions. Samuel T Francis's book Leviathan & It's Enemies is an excellent culmination of elite theory and digs into the differences between the soft managerial regime of the poz and the hard managerial regimes of the Nazis/Soviets.
I agree with that. They have no real hard power, so a proper genocide is likely out, just anachro-tryanny.
There's also the fact that they still have enough access to do very stupid things with the limited hard power that they have.
I don't think for one moment that Kamalla Harris or Nancy Pelosi wouldn't tell a National Guard or Capitol Police unit to fire an M240 machine gun on a crowd of unarmed people.
Now, that would work about as well for them as it did Ceaușescu, but it can still happen.
I think you're completely ignoring the fact that both war and violence have evolved since 1940. The elites aren't capable of true physical violence anymore because they don't need it. The tools for economic and psychological warfare have advanced to the point where traditional violence is basically obsolete. The government doesn't need to kill you when it can simply snuff out your ability to communicate, organize, fund raise, etc. And the moment you fight back with violence, the media frames you as the villain while the whole system comes down on you.
This is why I fear a proper genocide, and don't tolerate the National Socialists.
In this case, the national socialists are the only ones actively working against the genocide, and you don't "tolerate" them because you think their enemies are too incompetent to complete that genocide.
Thabks, I came to say something along these lines, but you clearly nailed it.
When you look at white liberals as the victims (albeit willing) of the system you describe, their actions make perfect sense. They've abandoned individuality for the power and protection of the group without fully understanding what they've gotten themselves in to.
That's why facts and logic are useless against them, they're in a subjective group reality where truth is maleable.
Any ideas for breaking them loose? I feel there may be opportunities when they cancel one of their own, but often their twice as dedicated after their public shaming. I'm leaning towards the idea that anyone already in is already a write off so we should concentrate everything on bringing up the next generation with an actual community which should prevent them from falling for the decoy.
They are emotional addicts. They need to hit rock bottom and realize that they can't keep doing what they are doing.
I'm not saying "punch a Leftist", I'm saying that you have to make them directly feel the impact of their decisions, then you have to offer individualism and responsibility as an alternative. The difficulty is that taking responsibility is scary, but the collective punishment of the group is also scary; so you have to figure out how to teach them to take responsibility while it's clear that trusting the group with responsibility is a bad idea.
So, for example, say you are dealing with an environmentalist. They are probably clamoring about some sort of virtue signaling bullshit about how their Prius will save the world. You can present all sorts of personal initiatives to them, and focus on ones that involve personal responsibility. Like gardening, soil management, and water management for their home. They are used to just making consumer choices that are validated by the group, but your points about taking personal initiative sound like good ideas (but they are normally just to lazy). You could probably even start out as small as having them grow their own herbs and going to farmers markets (which are normally filled to the limit with Trump supporters, make some excuses about "raw foods" and "locally grown, sustainable, organic, agriculture"). Another idea is to grow trees! Hippies love trees and shit! If they like flowers, suggest a "Bee Pollinator Corridor".
Eventually, the group is going to do something fucking retarded and demand she be executed for not attending a protest or something. Maybe she brought the wrong brand of LeCrox. It doesn't matter, the lynchers will come out.
Use that opportunity to show that she's actually doing the work of land/soil/water/wild-life management, and all these other people are just posers who are virtue-signaling. Meanwhile she has the rain-garden to prove that she manages her own water run-off.
That's just it: Leftists can't build anything. You will have taught her to build something that is still emotionally aligned with her ideology. However, you have subverted the Leftism by teaching her how to build and maintain a thing, and how to have a long time preference. That virtue signaling to the group isn't as important as actually doing stuff, and that her personal success is more important, tangible, and permanent than the group's love-bombing.
Right wing subversion doesn't have to start off with yelling "The John Birch Society Did Nothing Wrong", just as Leftism doesn't start with "Luxury Space Communism Now!" They start the subversion by talking about "rights" and "equality". Start your right-wing subversion with "responsibility" and "individual initiative".
The point is to then do this repeatedly, so that you build their individualism and self-confidence; so that they learn to distrust their previously cherished sources of information and affirmation.
There are those that are truly predators that we can't reach, but they are fewer in number than we think. Maybe, like, 10-20%
I'm leaning towards the idea that anyone already in is already a write off so we should concentrate everything on bringing up the next generation with an actual community which should prevent them from falling for the decoy.
Getting people as they age is actually the easier success story. However, we absolutely have to take the initiative to young people.
It's why we can't stop gaming. We can't reach fucking anyone who is young through traditional means. Gaming clans and competitions have to be a priority. If we can provide them with anti-Left recreational social outlets, that will be more than enough to blunt the effect of Leftism on the Zoomers because they will be moving rightward as they age.
Personally, I think Halo Infinite and Pokemon are excellent opportunities. There seems to be a lot of hype around these games, and given our age, we can still interact with the franchise well enough. We can be the rightist alternative to soyboy game journos crying over their switches.
No, but yes. It is the result of a system of industrial-scale, psychological and emotional abuse. This industrial-scale abuse is an outgrowth of an ideology of predators.
White Leftists are literally being driven insane by a political system that is intentionally making them emotionally dependent, highly sensitive, highly insecure, and constantly feeling victimized and violated.
The Social Justice Racket itself is a protection racket, that exists to cultivate dependent populations on the protection racket as a reliable source of both income and power to authoritarian minded personalities. Chief among these personalities are sociopaths and narcissists. Sociopaths are seeking power from populations they see as prey that deserve to be predated upon for being to weak to attack them, and narcissists are seeking to cultivate a dependent population that will constantly give them the attention and emotional affirmation that they are actually dependent on. The Sociopathic Narcissist is the predator who thrives most in the Social Justice Racket. They have the drive of affirmation that a narcissist has, but also have the ruthlessness to manipulate social environments to their advantage to cultivate that environment from their prey (or to simply cultivate normal people in to prey).
These abuse tactics and systems they develop are fairly standard among sociopaths and narcissists. The purpose is to create extreme social tension, along with disproportionate and random punishments from the predator, in order to use the prey's insecurity in social status as a weapon to manipulate behavior. Though I have said it before on Reddit, I will re-iterate their tactics:
Expansion of hunting grounds: Radicalization [predators] require a constant inflow of new recruits because prey can be easily exhausted in the predator's hunting ground. Without new inflows of prey, competition between predators will emerge and the environment will collapse as the predators destroy each other. The solution that the Social Justice Racket has come up with for this is to create a Ponzi Scheme of Predators. Each predator/abuser bringing in their own abuse system into the racket, while using the power of the racket to expand upwards. Of the prey that remain will be the prey that can be siphons who can be predated upon long term, and the subversive vassals who bring more prey into the killing fields.
Supplementing Community: When it comes to Social Justice in particular, the hunting grounds use the alure of a sense of community, identity, and emotional satisfaction to attract prey like zebra to a watering hole. This honest desire will be used as a weapon against the prey to cultivate them. In the case of Social Justice in particular, the predators that are most influential the prey's immediate social justice circles, will use very specific tactics to control his emotions which are listed below. This need for community, identity, and emotional satisfaction form the foundation of the killing fields. This what community looks like. Show them what community looks like.
Love-bombing: This is one of the ways the SJ hunting grounds indoctrinate people into thinking they have a loving and supporting community. People who make ideologically correct choices are supported by an enormous amount of emotional affirmation for making the morally right choice. Expect lots of compliments and statements of support. This is what the virtue signaling is for. People can easily start to get addicted to this, and the point. The addiction cultivates a dependency on the predator, and the prey can no longer self-affirm. This generates permanent insecurity, which creates permanent dependency.
Cognitive Overload: Once love-bombed into the hunting grounds, prey will be exposed to an absolute insane word salad of false epistemology that is designed confuse and de-moralize (see: Bezminov). This "cognitive overload" is useful in generating enough confusion and intellectual insecurity to make them susceptible to suggestion from both authority and peer pressure. Although most entire industries seek to reduce cognitive overload due to it's severe consequences, purely malicious actions (like a military unit flanking an enemy position) seek to introduce it. As a military unit seeks to introduce cognitive overload by panicking enemy soldiers into inducing a route, the Social Justice predators introduce cognitive overload to introduce suggestibility to new recruits, as well as a feeling of inadequacy and incompetence among the herd. "I have a lot to learn."
De-individuation: As the prey gets more dependent on the emotional affirmation, they may confront the cognitive overload. The suggestibility of social pressure makes them abandon their own intellectual mechanisms as they are given authority figures, and social groups, that will make decisions for them to reduce the cognitive load that has been introduced. This reliance on affirmation and load reduction begins the process of deindividuating the prey to the herd, and allowing the collective to replace their own judgement, even regarding themselves. Emotional Incontinence and demands of zero boundaries mean that social judgement and stigma replace even private decisions. Every time he follows the instructions of the herd, they will re-affirm his decision as morally right. Making individual choices confers uncomfortable levels of responsibility as the dependency weakens him and as he is not actually the predator moving the herd along, and doesn't want to stick out from the herd. The predator guiding the prey will claim to be the both intellectual and moral authority figure for the group's will as a whole, and will also claim the highest level of victimhood (due to the social status this provides). This can normally be reinforced in media and academia.
Unique knowledge & self-doubt: The prey's cognitive overload comes in neigh-on-indecipherable ideologies like Critical Race Theory, Social Justice, Neo-Marxism, Post-Modernism, and Feminist Philosophy.This is the creation of a false epistemology that is nothing more than a performative display of intellectual authority. The prey will be conditioned to say and accept absurd reductionist claims from authority figures asserting unique knowledge, to alleviate the cognitive overload discussed previously. The reduction of this stress makes these reductions an emotional imperative both to himself and the group. These reductions become incantation for the group to recite. Disruption and dissent from these incantations both increases the cognitive overload, and challenges the social ordering being cultivated by the predator (which would result in a loss of social status and support systems). Thus, the incantations will be rationalized by everyone around him while the 'authority figures' (again, his local leaders, academics, or the press) so that he won't feel like he said something stupid, but is "virtue signaling" his obedience. He will be loved bombed for repeating these mantras in public. Things like "women have penises", "blacks can't be racist", "socialism/communism was never tried", "Kavanaugh is going to kill thousands of women", "you're either a feminist or your a sexist", "Transwomen are women", "Love is Love", "Trust the Science". Dissent from these reductionist statements will not be tolerated. This is the implementation of a totalitarian moral code on the herd in the hunting grounds.
Egg-shells: Hypersensitivity, paranoia, and outrage cultivation: To keep the prey from coming to unacceptable conclusions, the rules that he's operating under will be constantly changing. This creates perpetual cognitive overload. New vocabulary will be subtracted and added by local leadership to maintain control under victims who are confused and perpetually disoriented by the Byzantine rules. This forces the victims to rely, perpetually, on group response and local leadership. This is actually a very common tactic in long-term interrogations by military forces (Make the prisoner dependent on the interrogator). Additionally, they will be made hypersensitive to specific stimuli through conditioning. Forcing people to be constantly upset and outraged as part of performative actions in response to triggering material in the media, or presented by leadership as political objectives (see: Trump Derangement Syndrome). After that is the paranoia, which further increases the sensitivity and reliance on local leadership.
Hate bombing: The moment the prey violates any one of these rules, he will be met with this. A veritable lynch mob of his own friends, associates, co-workers, and even family shaming him, degrading him, humiliating him, and belittling him. The prey will be made emotionally unstable because he will be taken to the highest of the highs with love bombing and the lowest of the lows with hate bombing. The only way for the prey to save itself is to the have an extreme reaction of abject sorrow to his abusers and literally beg for their forgiveness and mercy and to implicate another. They will show the prey only the smallest margin of tolerance and let everyone else know that he is on a razor's edge (further destabilizing him emotionally and psychologically). He will be like an addict who has learned that whenever he does the wrong thing, his friends and family will make him go through withdraw, and then give him a little bit of emotional security back before he actually breaks free of the manipulation. These experiences will be traumatic to watch if he sees them and worse to go through. On the other hand, if he is lucky enough to participate in the hate bombing, his aggression is rewarded with further affirmation. This is the purpose of struggle sessions and lynchings: not only to scape-goat, but to serve as a virtue signal by the other prey who seek to use this as an opportunity to gain emotional security. Everyone who doesn't participate in the lynching will be punished. And since everyone participated in the lynching, if there is ever vengeance or retaliation for the lynching, everyone is complicit in the crime, making them loyal to the one predator who organized it. Saddam did something similar when he killed part of the ba'ath party by having a number of it's members shoot the ones he wanted dead. "Abu Udi, we are with you!"
Social Isolation: The prey is now surrounded by constant emotional reactions. Life outside the hunting grounds includes a litany of pavlovian style triggers that he he has been conditioned for him to respond to. He'll bark at you when you say, "tranny". It will become very difficult for him to operate in normal society because he's been too conditioned, and normal society won't love bomb him like he's grown used to. He's lost the necessary emotional stoicism, self-confidence, and individualism that is necessary to exist in the world. He's trying to deal with the hate bombing he's doing to himself in his own head, because he's internalized his predator's moral imperatives. Since no one else is in the cult, no one else understands what's happening to him, and might even make fun of him for his hypersensitivity. It will be all be seen as a betrayal, and when he goes back to the group, they will agree that the "toxic" people in his life will be cut out.
End of part one..
That's the most thorough analysis I've seen of the progressive social order, doubleplus good.
I've been thinking about this since 2014. A lot of my perceptions from my own experiences with life and abuse have gone into it. I was truly horrified when I started to actually understand what was happening as an industrial system of regular abuse.
This is why I fear a proper genocide, and don't tolerate the National Socialists. The Holocaust was an industrial system of murder that emerged from a similar system of industrial abuse. Same with the Soviet Union's industrial mechanism of abuse as well.
It all only goes in one bad direction. Luckily, I think the system has become so unstable that they won't be able to achieve it. I expect relatively few casualties, as when the USSR collapsed.
I don't think our elites are capable of utilizing violence properly, which makes a genocide difficult for them. Antifa demonstrates this well in that their violence is pretty shit even when given total carte blanche. The GAE is exclusively run by foxes and they don't understand the nature of lions. Samuel T Francis's book Leviathan & It's Enemies is an excellent culmination of elite theory and digs into the differences between the soft managerial regime of the poz and the hard managerial regimes of the Nazis/Soviets.
I agree with that. They have no real hard power, so a proper genocide is likely out, just anachro-tryanny.
There's also the fact that they still have enough access to do very stupid things with the limited hard power that they have.
I don't think for one moment that Kamalla Harris or Nancy Pelosi wouldn't tell a National Guard or Capitol Police unit to fire an M240 machine gun on a crowd of unarmed people.
Now, that would work about as well for them as it did Ceaușescu, but it can still happen.
I think you're completely ignoring the fact that both war and violence have evolved since 1940. The elites aren't capable of true physical violence anymore because they don't need it. The tools for economic and psychological warfare have advanced to the point where traditional violence is basically obsolete. The government doesn't need to kill you when it can simply snuff out your ability to communicate, organize, fund raise, etc. And the moment you fight back with violence, the media frames you as the villain while the whole system comes down on you.
In this case, the national socialists are the only ones actively working against the genocide, and you don't "tolerate" them because you think their enemies are too incompetent to complete that genocide.
Wut?
No, the National Socialists are never not working towards a genocide, that is the purpose of their revolutionary racial communism.
It's why Black Lives Matter isn't going to be peaceful. They are Black National Socialists.
None of them should be tolerated.
Have you considered expanding it a bit each day and seeing if it turns into a book?
... i may or may not be working on one...
If I was, you'd probably recognize the writing style pretty quick.
Fantastic, can we subscribe to get part 2 when it's out?
Instead of saying I'd give you gold, I'll tell you that I saved this post to my personal archive.
I just posted it.
Thabks, I came to say something along these lines, but you clearly nailed it.
When you look at white liberals as the victims (albeit willing) of the system you describe, their actions make perfect sense. They've abandoned individuality for the power and protection of the group without fully understanding what they've gotten themselves in to.
That's why facts and logic are useless against them, they're in a subjective group reality where truth is maleable.
Any ideas for breaking them loose? I feel there may be opportunities when they cancel one of their own, but often their twice as dedicated after their public shaming. I'm leaning towards the idea that anyone already in is already a write off so we should concentrate everything on bringing up the next generation with an actual community which should prevent them from falling for the decoy.
They are emotional addicts. They need to hit rock bottom and realize that they can't keep doing what they are doing.
I'm not saying "punch a Leftist", I'm saying that you have to make them directly feel the impact of their decisions, then you have to offer individualism and responsibility as an alternative. The difficulty is that taking responsibility is scary, but the collective punishment of the group is also scary; so you have to figure out how to teach them to take responsibility while it's clear that trusting the group with responsibility is a bad idea.
So, for example, say you are dealing with an environmentalist. They are probably clamoring about some sort of virtue signaling bullshit about how their Prius will save the world. You can present all sorts of personal initiatives to them, and focus on ones that involve personal responsibility. Like gardening, soil management, and water management for their home. They are used to just making consumer choices that are validated by the group, but your points about taking personal initiative sound like good ideas (but they are normally just to lazy). You could probably even start out as small as having them grow their own herbs and going to farmers markets (which are normally filled to the limit with Trump supporters, make some excuses about "raw foods" and "locally grown, sustainable, organic, agriculture"). Another idea is to grow trees! Hippies love trees and shit! If they like flowers, suggest a "Bee Pollinator Corridor".
Eventually, the group is going to do something fucking retarded and demand she be executed for not attending a protest or something. Maybe she brought the wrong brand of LeCrox. It doesn't matter, the lynchers will come out.
Use that opportunity to show that she's actually doing the work of land/soil/water/wild-life management, and all these other people are just posers who are virtue-signaling. Meanwhile she has the rain-garden to prove that she manages her own water run-off.
That's just it: Leftists can't build anything. You will have taught her to build something that is still emotionally aligned with her ideology. However, you have subverted the Leftism by teaching her how to build and maintain a thing, and how to have a long time preference. That virtue signaling to the group isn't as important as actually doing stuff, and that her personal success is more important, tangible, and permanent than the group's love-bombing.
Right wing subversion doesn't have to start off with yelling "The John Birch Society Did Nothing Wrong", just as Leftism doesn't start with "Luxury Space Communism Now!" They start the subversion by talking about "rights" and "equality". Start your right-wing subversion with "responsibility" and "individual initiative".
The point is to then do this repeatedly, so that you build their individualism and self-confidence; so that they learn to distrust their previously cherished sources of information and affirmation.
There are those that are truly predators that we can't reach, but they are fewer in number than we think. Maybe, like, 10-20%
Getting people as they age is actually the easier success story. However, we absolutely have to take the initiative to young people.
It's why we can't stop gaming. We can't reach fucking anyone who is young through traditional means. Gaming clans and competitions have to be a priority. If we can provide them with anti-Left recreational social outlets, that will be more than enough to blunt the effect of Leftism on the Zoomers because they will be moving rightward as they age.
Personally, I think Halo Infinite and Pokemon are excellent opportunities. There seems to be a lot of hype around these games, and given our age, we can still interact with the franchise well enough. We can be the rightist alternative to soyboy game journos crying over their switches.