We are despised because we are weak.
(i.imgur.com)
Comments (72)
sorted by:
On the left, you have a statement from one of the ASU students who was harassed for being white.
On the right, you have the response from the 'organization' that instigated and spread the video of the harassment.
Not only have they no fear at all over what they have done, they double down on attacking the two boys. The boy, on the other hand, says he has "faith" in the process that will clearly exonerate the two hate-mongers, as the university has already labeled it a "disagreement".
Contrary to popular myth, weakness is not what gets you respect or consideration. Only strength. And all we do is show weakness.
-Heinlein
Which is why I want some level of interpersonal violence to be legal. Not much, but a low level which would allow for effective problem solving without inflicting lasting injury or harm.
there are many states where mutual unarmed combat is legal. Maybe it should be all states.
He has one and that statement very much looks like his lawyer wrote it.
Now whether he has a good lawyer or one of the many woke cultists at the bar willing to talk a straight white male into life-ruining decisions is another matter.
For real. This idea that any attorney is better than none is straight bullshit. Everything in life boils down to whether you share common values with someone else.
Determine that first before you do personal business with anyone.
He's clearly an idiot. He had a Police Matter sticker. Police defend criminals. Police attack innocent people. Look at Australia. Look at EVERY BLM protest. I'm not defending the racists cunts that instigated the confrontation, but he was dumb to have that in the first place, and why even hang out in the multi cultural center - unless he is trying to pick up Asian chicks, there is no reason to be there.
The best advice I can give to young people of any race out there, is to avoid blacks at all cost. This advice applies to black people as well.
Bear in mind these university incidents are always targeting kids, usually in their first year. Almost none of them have any life experience to prepare them for the full force force of the administrative system coming down on them, alongside the loosely organised syndicate of student special interest groups who hate him for what he is. Also given their demographics, they have no experience of mentorship from the education system either, because nobody wanted them. Until they became a PR problem, that is.
It's very easy for them to want to fight but have no practical idea how to, then some lawyer (waaaay to many are woke ideologians looking to score some woke points) or faux sympathetic administrator comes along to advise them that if they just demonstrate good faith first and have a little patience, that will get the administration to listen to them seriously. They know what they're doing with that advice, but they know how to make it seem reasonable, maybe even make it seem noble to rein in your emotions and 'be the bigger man' for a while. All whilst knowingly crippling the young boys' position.
Personally that statement smacks of being coached/ghostwritten, especially considering the much more straightforward sentiments expressed in the incident video. It's not necessarily weakness, it could just be foolishness.
It's fine to be a little mad at their naiveté, I wasn't that fucking gullible even as a fresh faced kid, but don't be surprised when someone throws some kids to a pack of wolves and they sometimes try to bark like one.
I hate remembering that people like us, who know all about how wokeists, are in the minority. Hell, it wasn't until I was mostly done with college (and this was 2+ years after GG) that I truly got redpilled. I'd've been trusting the university to fairly and judiciously deal with the situation too if it'd happened to me.
And yet anyone who advocates for actions that would show strength gets shouted down or called a glowie depending on the form they advocate for displaying.
I'm pretty sure that what you are thinking of, at the moment, would only strengthen the other side, while accomplishing nothing at all. Lashing out while you are weak does nothing for you.
Never lashing out is worse though. To be completely cowed such that you never act...it's hard to fathom a better distillation of abject weakness.
I didn't say never. I have always argued to people who whine that women can do any sort of domestic violence, that this is because of a lack of deterrent. If they knew that such behavior would get their skull smashed, then they wouldn't do it, even if they thought that the police would then railroad the guy.
This video just makes you mad. It has no consequences. Someone being racist to you in public, I'm sorry, but I couldn't care less about your feelings. I care about the effect that it has in the war on woke. Does it help us, or does it help them? In this case, it seems to help us. So I think it's good.
Sometimes you have to swallow your pride and think strategically.
Agreed. However I don't think I've ever seen you comment on a scenario where it crosses whatever threshold it is you think exists that would warrant escalation. What are the lines that have to be crossed before it's ok for someone to escalate aggressions, to respond in kind to the attacks and provocations of an enemy?
I almost feel that I'm being lured into some sort of trap. I am not sure specifying that is terrible productive. But more generally, there are a couple of things to consider. Revolutions almost always go bad. But that is not even my main issue.
Success. That's the only thing that matters if you want to vindicate liberty. Not threshold is a reason to try to restrain madness in a manner that is more likely to make things worse (much worse) than better.
I'm not clever or deceitful enough to lay traps. I'm just frustrated by your refusal to ever even contemplate the idea that a physical response is warranted and morally justified. Sitting on our hands forever will only ever end with us all in gulags.
People are always quick to encourage others to escalate, but rarely put their money where their mouth is.
Why are you pushing others to be violent when you clearly seem to think someone yelling at university students is the line in the sand where you should get violent? Shouldn't you hold to your principles before expecting others to hold to your principles?
It's the composite of all the various things going horribly wrong at warp speed all together that has me agitated. If all you're seeing is isolated incidents then sure my reaction looks pretty wild. I just see the overall trajectory of the direction we're trending in and see a dwindling window in which to correct course before this shit is all locked in for several generations and the rest of my years on this earth are destined to be spent in a genuine hellscape.
There is no scenario where whites successfully push back against this hatred without a bunch of white people being destroyed by this system. The process of whites becoming strong again will necessarily cost white lives.
If you think "Anti-Trump activist killed in apparent hit" wouldn't play into the narrative because the perp isn't caught, then I have a bridge to sell you.
Every time a BLM activist stubs their toe, the media plays it up like they were targeted by right-wing coffee tables and white-supremacist legos.
The mistake these people make is thinking that this is somehow a balanced setting for discourse down to the event itself - a picture perfect example of the current paradigm.
The words you heard in the video were that of righteous indignation. They own those spaces, and these boys stepped out of line simply by existing as their ideological opposition and expected to make a conversation of it on goodfaith. We keep making the same mistake over and over only to be sacificed to the false idol of comfort by our own even if every word that comes out of the opposition's mouth is a lie.
The enemy relies on this, they count on it. We need to abandon the desire of making others feel comfortable all the way up the whole chain of command. Hate us? Please do.
Christians have been neutered since the 1960s. Christianity of 100 years ago is nothing like Christianity of 50 years ago.
Do you mean libertarian like the american "libertarian party"? I've always thought the non-aggression principle was more of a vow to not use violence except when confronted with violence rather than a promise to be a reliable victim.
Anyone unwilling to prepare for bad actors is doomed, regardless of the flags they wave.
Is there any single principle that could prevent that, though? I think vigilance and gatekeeping may be the only means of prevention there, and they still aren't guarantees.
"But it must be realized that, when dealing with an utterly ruthless enemy who has clearly expressed his intention of wiping this nation out of existence, there is no room for any scruple or compunction about the methods to be employed in preventing him."
-W.E. Fairbairn, All-in Fighting
I am a firm believer in treating people equally. This isn’t equal treatment. You can’t condemn racism and then be as racist as possible to whites.
Treating equally is a bit of a misnomer. Does the murderer deserve to be treated to an equal amount of trust and freedom as the non-murderer?
I'm a firm believer of everyone being judged in equal measures on the same scales, but once I know what they've done I'm a also firm believer of treating people with what they deserve.
You have good point. I should’ve said that. Equal measures on same scales.
Yes, at least initially. Innocent until proven guilty and all that.
theyre treated equally to other people who commited their fagot crime
The only appropriate response to these lunatics is "Get fucked."
The proper socially acceptable response to women getting uppity in public is to go after their looks. Weight, hair, clothes, face etc.
Let's try being strong for a change.
Yes, because Black Lives matter has fucking nothing to do with what its name implies, you fucking dolts.
Let them hate so long as they fear.
Two comments:
That symbol looks like a certain virus...
Displays of weakness through being kind or charitable or forgiving are frequently met with contempt. Many westerners who may or may not be Christian in their temperament like I am (I'm a non believer but have a general Christian culture ethos. But not to the point of delusion like many western Christians do.)
The big problem with this thinking until you realize it is that resentful haters don't see your kindness, charitable or forgiving nature in a positive light, they see it as a means to have contempt for your gullibility. They will then secretly or openly hate you and abuse you. If you listen closely to what these people are saying they are clearly exposing their hate and contempt in which there is absolutely nothing you can do short of separation.
But even with separation they will still hound you relentlessly for resources because in their minds they will never let go of the idea that you somehow owe them something. It is impossible to buy them off, to try to do so will only further their contempt and animus for you, and cause them to keep pounding the idea that you owe them something.
If you are sane and competent you will realize that the only way to deal with these people is through an immovable position of "no, not doing that". That is the only thing that works and forces people to respect you. It is only through absolute respect that people can fairly deal with each other but you must establish the respect first. If you fail to do that you are either a useful idiot and fool or you are a traitor to everything you hold dear.
As a side note, the astute among you will recognize their behaviors match a certain other group who uses your western nature against you. I'll leave it at that...
Those guys were definitely trolling. Not sure why. Did they want this to happen? The statement feels designed to make him look like the good guy to the general public, while the other one feels belligerent. Will this be another instance of MAGA hat teen versus Native American drum guy?
White people need to do sit-ins at these multicultural spaces in colleges and refuse to leave, just like MLK did in the 50s.
What these people did and are doing to these two dudes reminds me exactly of what the Nazis did to the Jews.
Same thing, same intolerance.
Believe it or not, people other than yours have suffered. Every instance of oppression doesn't need to be compared with or measured against what happened to your people 75 fucking years ago.
So you accept that the nazis were oppressive, killed people, discriminated against others and were, overall evil?
I think that comparing the sjws to nazis is fitting, when theyre trying to rewrite culture, destroy heroes, and tell 'the other' how they need to live. In the op theyre trying to get their gay friends to gang up on someone for having a different political opinion, can you think of another political group that did that other than the brownshirts, and perhaps modern day BLM? any other groups at all?
That weak faggot deserves it all, then.
...a "DID NOT VOTE FOR BIDEN STICKER" made students uncomfortable.
they should have unenrolled them ON THE SPOT. what absolute retards, lmao
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks