Something you seem to be missing, is the long-term. I'm not saying I agree with the weaponization theory; however, you're not thinking of the bigger picture or what will happen over time.
Ignoring the weapon theory completely, the threat of myocarditis is not something that's going to manifest itself in our current society, but rather, something that will be shown in the future.
The heart is one of the few organs in the human body that does not heal itself in a very impactful way. When these young men and women are developing myocarditis, because they're young, they're very likely to simply recover and move on with their lives. The problem is, there's one very serious consequence of having had it: it leaves a large amount of residual scarring on the heart which can be harmful in the future, causing any number of pernicious effects.
To put it bluntly: it's causing permanent heart damage. That's what people should be worried about. There's a very real potential to lower life expectancy by a huge amount.
To put it bluntly: it's causing permanent heart damage.
That's what people should be worried about. There's a very real potential to lower life expectancy by a huge amount.
This right here.
Small clotting issues building up over time causing permanent heart damage is something that we will only see manifest over time in a large amount of people. The fact that major health organizations are prohibiting tracking in relation to these vaccines should terrify the average person.
Kill your enemy at an insignificant rate while killing your own troops at a slightly less insignificant rate.
Well sure, it sounds like a dumb idea.
But maybe it's just the best they could do?
I mean, they would have already had to somehow secretly test its efficacy on tens of thousands of people to even find out if it worked before they could enact their diabolical scheme, but maybe...?
It does look like it effects younger men much more than younger women, but even if they were still under reported by factor of 100, it is still a shitty weapon.
It's not outright killing women at the same rate as men because it's affecting women differently. It targets the ovaries in women. This isn't just killing women, it's causing long-term fertility issues.
I have a hard time getting my head around this shot being deployed as a weapon of genocide. Those in control have nothing to gain from that. They want to lord over slaves, not corpses. If everyone dies but the elite, then who's to raise their food, take care of them, etc. The way I see it the weapon is fear and the vaccine is a carelessly developed symbol of control. Hell, they might could have gotten away with giving saline shots if they tried.
Still, the media is very feminist so of course they totally ignore any affects on men and magnify effects on women, like they do on everything.
Yes, I know that quote about the male population must be reduced so you don't have to share that one.
Those in control have nothing to gain from that. They want to lord over slaves, not corpses.
They don't need ten billion slaves. They need about 100 million slaves, or at least that's what they think, if you believe the Georgia Guidestones (?) declarations.
Regardless, killing half the people to ensure the remainder exist in a perpetual state of servitude is well within the realm of possibility for people who do not value human life.
The tech is also being applied to cure all kinds of boomer old age diseases. I think a large part of this is boomers in power terrified of their own mortality, and, money. As usual everything is always about money and power. They get both by forcing populations to submit to mandatory injections.
If I were to pick a genocidal group, I'd go to women first over nonsense like how the Jews are trying to kill off the world by forcing their own people to take the death shot at the highest rates. I just don't think they are competent enough to intentionally create a shot that would successfully kill off men without taking two-thirds of the women with them.
Something you seem to be missing, is the long-term. I'm not saying I agree with the weaponization theory; however, you're not thinking of the bigger picture or what will happen over time.
Ignoring the weapon theory completely, the threat of myocarditis is not something that's going to manifest itself in our current society, but rather, something that will be shown in the future.
The heart is one of the few organs in the human body that does not heal itself in a very impactful way. When these young men and women are developing myocarditis, because they're young, they're very likely to simply recover and move on with their lives. The problem is, there's one very serious consequence of having had it: it leaves a large amount of residual scarring on the heart which can be harmful in the future, causing any number of pernicious effects.
To put it bluntly: it's causing permanent heart damage.
That's what people should be worried about. There's a very real potential to lower life expectancy by a huge amount.
This right here.
Small clotting issues building up over time causing permanent heart damage is something that we will only see manifest over time in a large amount of people. The fact that major health organizations are prohibiting tracking in relation to these vaccines should terrify the average person.
Well sure, it sounds like a dumb idea.
But maybe it's just the best they could do?
I mean, they would have already had to somehow secretly test its efficacy on tens of thousands of people to even find out if it worked before they could enact their diabolical scheme, but maybe...?
It's not outright killing women at the same rate as men because it's affecting women differently. It targets the ovaries in women. This isn't just killing women, it's causing long-term fertility issues.
I have a hard time getting my head around this shot being deployed as a weapon of genocide. Those in control have nothing to gain from that. They want to lord over slaves, not corpses. If everyone dies but the elite, then who's to raise their food, take care of them, etc. The way I see it the weapon is fear and the vaccine is a carelessly developed symbol of control. Hell, they might could have gotten away with giving saline shots if they tried.
Still, the media is very feminist so of course they totally ignore any affects on men and magnify effects on women, like they do on everything.
Yes, I know that quote about the male population must be reduced so you don't have to share that one.
They don't need ten billion slaves. They need about 100 million slaves, or at least that's what they think, if you believe the Georgia Guidestones (?) declarations.
Regardless, killing half the people to ensure the remainder exist in a perpetual state of servitude is well within the realm of possibility for people who do not value human life.
The tech is also being applied to cure all kinds of boomer old age diseases. I think a large part of this is boomers in power terrified of their own mortality, and, money. As usual everything is always about money and power. They get both by forcing populations to submit to mandatory injections.
I'll give you an "amen and awomen" to that.
If I were to pick a genocidal group, I'd go to women first over nonsense like how the Jews are trying to kill off the world by forcing their own people to take the death shot at the highest rates. I just don't think they are competent enough to intentionally create a shot that would successfully kill off men without taking two-thirds of the women with them.
your conspiraccies have finally come true, OP. fizer is the ultimate incel chick
Equal rights now!