It cut out massive exploitative aspects, giving girls the majority of the money
Aren't female porn stars paid several times as much as their male coworkers?
choice of what they upload
Is the insinuation here that female porn stars have no say in what is uploaded? If you don't want something you starred in uploaded...don't star in it. You're not forced to.
The insinuation is that women have no agency or accountability. So if they upload their tits to OF and it goes "the way it should" - piles of money and attention - then things are working correctly. If it goes "the way it shouldn't" - very little money, lots of embarrassment, unwanted attention - then things are working incorrectly and must be changed.
then again, most female in porn are for male audience, males in porn are for effect, not for view pleasure...and most targeting of porn is to male audience
I think your melodramatic nonsense does nothing to make them victims, no. If there's any victim, it's the girls who whore themselves out because it was taught to them that this is good or acceptable.
By the way, GC agrees with you that OnlyFans is very bad.
I wouldn't necessarily go as far as to say she is controlled opposition. I think it's the default "sisters are doing it for themselves" hard system override that all women have.
I'm not sure she was a "plant"; I think she's just a 90s-00s era Canadian feminist that was popular with a lot of 90s-00s era liberals. We had and still have a lot of those people in these quarters of the internet who simply wish that era was the "end of history"
I am pretty sure that you are controlled opposition, or actually a 26-year-old feminist who tries to discredit critics of feminism by spewing the most unhinged crap imaginable and repeatedly making false predictions.
Apparently, it has more than women do. They actually cut off OnlyFans from payments.
If someone else reasoned in your feminist manner, he would say that the male bankers at JPMorgan tried to shut down OF in order to help male pornographers confiscate more of the value created by female porn stars.
Have to make the punishment fit the crime. Asset strip + 5y in prison.
You get mad when your precious coomers voluntarily give over their money to ugly thots, but want to steal the belongings of Lauren Southern for not liking OnlyFans while acknowledging its positive side?
She's not wrong by the way.
We'll need a lot more women's prisons if we are to get justice for the kids they targeted.
You see, your great folly (quite apart from your lunatic program) is that one never announces what one is going to do beforehand, or one will never be in a position to do so.
Aren't female porn stars paid several times as much as their male coworkers?
Is the insinuation here that female porn stars have no say in what is uploaded? If you don't want something you starred in uploaded...don't star in it. You're not forced to.
The insinuation is that women have no agency or accountability. So if they upload their tits to OF and it goes "the way it should" - piles of money and attention - then things are working correctly. If it goes "the way it shouldn't" - very little money, lots of embarrassment, unwanted attention - then things are working incorrectly and must be changed.
then again, most female in porn are for male audience, males in porn are for effect, not for view pleasure...and most targeting of porn is to male audience
Coomers are not victims.
I think your melodramatic nonsense does nothing to make them victims, no. If there's any victim, it's the girls who whore themselves out because it was taught to them that this is good or acceptable.
By the way, GC agrees with you that OnlyFans is very bad.
I wouldn't necessarily go as far as to say she is controlled opposition. I think it's the default "sisters are doing it for themselves" hard system override that all women have.
The tradthot is a liar and a grifter, and Lauren is both of those. She humped her way through half the industry.
They are a minority at this point, for sure, but there are women out there who don't fuck every dude who looks good in a t-shirt.
I'm not sure she was a "plant"; I think she's just a 90s-00s era Canadian feminist that was popular with a lot of 90s-00s era liberals. We had and still have a lot of those people in these quarters of the internet who simply wish that era was the "end of history"
Well sir, I'm willing to view her with more scrutiny as a result of this so it's fine
She simply and directly is Jewish.
Just a feminist youtube grifter. Anyone believing otherwise is kind of a dumb person.
I am pretty sure that you are controlled opposition, or actually a 26-year-old feminist who tries to discredit critics of feminism by spewing the most unhinged crap imaginable and repeatedly making false predictions.
Why didn't you quote the first part of what he said, if you believe it?
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1436084333274673154
Imagine thinking that JPMorgan has morals.
Let me guess, Nuremberg trials for people who say that OnlyFans is good where they will be executed?
If someone else reasoned in your feminist manner, he would say that the male bankers at JPMorgan tried to shut down OF in order to help male pornographers confiscate more of the value created by female porn stars.
You get mad when your precious coomers voluntarily give over their money to ugly thots, but want to steal the belongings of Lauren Southern for not liking OnlyFans while acknowledging its positive side?
She's not wrong by the way.
You see, your great folly (quite apart from your lunatic program) is that one never announces what one is going to do beforehand, or one will never be in a position to do so.