Apparently, it has more than women do. They actually cut off OnlyFans from payments.
If someone else reasoned in your feminist manner, he would say that the male bankers at JPMorgan tried to shut down OF in order to help male pornographers confiscate more of the value created by female porn stars.
Have to make the punishment fit the crime. Asset strip + 5y in prison.
You get mad when your precious coomers voluntarily give over their money to ugly thots, but want to steal the belongings of Lauren Southern for not liking OnlyFans while acknowledging its positive side?
She's not wrong by the way.
We'll need a lot more women's prisons if we are to get justice for the kids they targeted.
You see, your great folly (quite apart from your lunatic program) is that one never announces what one is going to do beforehand, or one will never be in a position to do so.
The difference being of course that JPM has never done anything good for men and backs feminist doctrine in every other facet of society. They just didn't want to be involved when this whole house of cards comes down and the system is revealed.
Asset stripping is not stealing. And she is wrong. The porn industry isn't exploitative. That's just the same logic that was debunked in the 1980s when the fucking radfems used it. What's exploitative and rather obviously so is what they're doing to make OF work.
I know I will never be in a position to do so. There's too much dirt on me for me to be the savior of this world from their evil plan. As cringey as it sounds, only someone pure and kindhearted (really does sound like a fairytale plot) would have a hope in hell of stopping them. Anyone with even a modicum of dirt on them will have it projected to the world. They'll pay your old acquaintances to say you're insane, your old girlfriends to say you're abusive etc.
Imagine thinking that JPMorgan has morals.
Let me guess, Nuremberg trials for people who say that OnlyFans is good where they will be executed?
Apparently, it has more than women do. They actually cut off OnlyFans from payments.
Have to make the punishment fit the crime. Asset strip + 5y in prison.
We'll need a lot more women's prisons if we are to get justice for the kids they targeted.
If someone else reasoned in your feminist manner, he would say that the male bankers at JPMorgan tried to shut down OF in order to help male pornographers confiscate more of the value created by female porn stars.
You get mad when your precious coomers voluntarily give over their money to ugly thots, but want to steal the belongings of Lauren Southern for not liking OnlyFans while acknowledging its positive side?
She's not wrong by the way.
You see, your great folly (quite apart from your lunatic program) is that one never announces what one is going to do beforehand, or one will never be in a position to do so.
The difference being of course that JPM has never done anything good for men and backs feminist doctrine in every other facet of society. They just didn't want to be involved when this whole house of cards comes down and the system is revealed.
Asset stripping is not stealing. And she is wrong. The porn industry isn't exploitative. That's just the same logic that was debunked in the 1980s when the fucking radfems used it. What's exploitative and rather obviously so is what they're doing to make OF work.
I know I will never be in a position to do so. There's too much dirt on me for me to be the savior of this world from their evil plan. As cringey as it sounds, only someone pure and kindhearted (really does sound like a fairytale plot) would have a hope in hell of stopping them. Anyone with even a modicum of dirt on them will have it projected to the world. They'll pay your old acquaintances to say you're insane, your old girlfriends to say you're abusive etc.