So, read the article. They posit that men are less savvy about getting information from the internet than women. And that men don't believe information coming from women and doctors. And that women are more concerned about their health than men. Therefore women should make all the health decisions for men, for their own good. QED
The most coherent description of "the patriarchy" is the state controls men and men control women. They're literally proposing the same thing except the state controls women and women control men.
Steinhauer was the daughter of an interfaith couple (her father practiced Christianity, while her mother practiced Judaism) and ultimately chose to practice Judaism.[10] Her marriage to Ed Wyatt was performed by Rabbi Judith Lewis In New York.[5]
You should always archive these. Partly because fuck wikipedia, but also because they aren't above changing these kinds of things. https://archive.is/Vk4pU
For reference, here's two archives of Robert Altman's wiki page.
It isn't their ethnicity that I have a problem with dude. I don't care if you or anyone else here is Jewish, I don't have a problem with you. But there is very clearly a recurring problem here and we have a number of high profile Jews openly saying that they do this shit as part of their in group.
Dumb article wow. No, we’re not “acting masculine”, we ARE masculine! Women clearly don’t understand men at all. It’s funny because they joke about the opposite, but we know women perfectly well, while they seem to believe that we are broken women.
That figure is for viral myocarditis, which this arguably is, but there's no reason to think that rate is the same for a virus that's able to self replicate in perpetuity constantly producing cytotoxic virus fragments and for virus fragments that can only be produced until the original mRNA breaks down.
That figure is also for clinically recorded cases. Myocarditis is one of those diseases that aren't easily diagnosed by blood test/imaging. MRI can do it but only if the heart is very significantly enlarged, but they generally don't do MRI scans without good reason. So they only usually catch myocarditis when it's bad enough to create symptoms like heart failure and they start looking for causes. Which means the vast majority of mild cases go undiagnosed.
That goes for vaccine induced myocarditis. The ones who end up in hospital and get diagnosed are at serious risk, but there's nothing to say those who got the vaccine and experienced some mild, subclinical inflammation are also at that same level of risk.
I'm saying there's no reason to equate something like hep-c constantly creating cytotoxic virus bits for the rest of someone's life and mrna that makes the cytotoxic virus bits for a few days. The former is continuous damage over time presumably increasing the mortality rate over time and the latter is a fixed amount of damage and you'd expect the mortality rate to drop over time.
There's existing research into how long mRNA lasts in cells. It varies but without a mechanism to replace it all of it will eventually break down and then it will be further broke down into peptides and then animo acids by recycling mechanisms in your cells.
So, read the article. They posit that men are less savvy about getting information from the internet than women. And that men don't believe information coming from women and doctors. And that women are more concerned about their health than men. Therefore women should make all the health decisions for men, for their own good. QED
The most coherent description of "the patriarchy" is the state controls men and men control women. They're literally proposing the same thing except the state controls women and women control men.
kek
Depends on who she is, innit? Didn't you say that the health advantages of being married are because you have a woman to nag you about your health?
Of course not, least of all the 'experts' who are consistently wrong. But this applies to Anthony Fauci as well as any random woman.
I knew you'd say that.
And I want women to not be fat and entitled. There is little chance of that so I don't give a fig what women want.
Never seen a German name before?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Steinhauer
You should always archive these. Partly because fuck wikipedia, but also because they aren't above changing these kinds of things. https://archive.is/Vk4pU
For reference, here's two archives of Robert Altman's wiki page.
#1 https://archive.is/EHpkA
#2 https://archive.is/dJ3WT
Want to play a game of spot the difference? I'll give you a hint, the date of death isn't the most interesting difference there.
Hey, at least in this case you actually criticize someone for her religion, rather than ethnicity.
It isn't their ethnicity that I have a problem with dude. I don't care if you or anyone else here is Jewish, I don't have a problem with you. But there is very clearly a recurring problem here and we have a number of high profile Jews openly saying that they do this shit as part of their in group.
((()))
Dumb article wow. No, we’re not “acting masculine”, we ARE masculine! Women clearly don’t understand men at all. It’s funny because they joke about the opposite, but we know women perfectly well, while they seem to believe that we are broken women.
What are the death rates?
Come again? What are you claiming that the death rates are due to the vaccine?
So how are they trying to kill you again?
And in how many cases does that occur?
Wow I actually hate the cucks at NYT so much.
That figure is for viral myocarditis, which this arguably is, but there's no reason to think that rate is the same for a virus that's able to self replicate in perpetuity constantly producing cytotoxic virus fragments and for virus fragments that can only be produced until the original mRNA breaks down.
That figure is also for clinically recorded cases. Myocarditis is one of those diseases that aren't easily diagnosed by blood test/imaging. MRI can do it but only if the heart is very significantly enlarged, but they generally don't do MRI scans without good reason. So they only usually catch myocarditis when it's bad enough to create symptoms like heart failure and they start looking for causes. Which means the vast majority of mild cases go undiagnosed.
That goes for vaccine induced myocarditis. The ones who end up in hospital and get diagnosed are at serious risk, but there's nothing to say those who got the vaccine and experienced some mild, subclinical inflammation are also at that same level of risk.
I'm saying there's no reason to equate something like hep-c constantly creating cytotoxic virus bits for the rest of someone's life and mrna that makes the cytotoxic virus bits for a few days. The former is continuous damage over time presumably increasing the mortality rate over time and the latter is a fixed amount of damage and you'd expect the mortality rate to drop over time.
There's existing research into how long mRNA lasts in cells. It varies but without a mechanism to replace it all of it will eventually break down and then it will be further broke down into peptides and then animo acids by recycling mechanisms in your cells.
Ok everyone, it's time for your booster shots.
I'm not going to argue that point. You need a booster every year, I mean every eight months, I mean every five months, I mean....
Some people lack the enzyme to break it down effectively so it has a longer life in the cell for them