I agree. All the suffering of the west is deserved. It will have to get A LOT worse before they reach the level of suffering the Germans and Japanese endured at the hands of the anglosphere. If they joined the correct side during WW2 none of this would be happening.
You're confusing the murderous and insane power establishment with regular people. Common mistake, but you should know that TPTB want people blaming themselves or each other for what are actually crimes against humanity committed by the state.
I'm very aware people were lied to and manipulated by the establishment. Good times make weak men. We need suffering to make us strong. We should have had a revolution long ago, but were too comfortable to be bothered.
and sadly that may also lead to mothers dying during childbirth of things like preeclampsia and hemorrhage. home birth is great when nothing goes wrong.
I 100% agree with you. Home births increasing was one of the first things that came to mind upon hearing about this. Then i immediately remembered why mortality was a lot higher during birth 150 years ago 😅
Well the fully vaxxed won't be around much longer anyway, so they're just going to spend their remaining days under a boot, since they didn't mind throwing experimental gene therapy into their bodies with ZERO care or caution in the world.
really amazing, isn’t it? I’m constantly remembering that we’re not even a year out from the first human trials (iirc) so we literally have zero clue what the long term outcomes might be. That fact alone is why most vaccines have to be tested for nearly 10 years before the masses are legally allowed to consume them. And saying it’s safe for pregnant women? They weren’t even included in the trials, all the data on that, if anyone is even tracking it honestly, is from the general population and it’s hasn’t been nearly long enough to know anything. People need to look up Thalidomide ffs…
Well the fully vaxxed won't be around much longer anyway
I wish people would stop stating this so definitively. As someone who is completely, 100% against the vaccine and thinks it's dangerous...we don't know what it will do to people going into the future. Will there be a mass die off in two years? Completely possible, and some data even predicts that...but we don't know for sure. Stating the vaccinated people are dead men walking isn't a good argument, because there's no way to know for sure.
Stating the vaccinated people are dead men walking isn't a good argument, because there's no way to know for sure.
Yes, we do know for sure.
If the messengers get into your bloodstream, it forces your immune system to kill you. 100% of the time it results in clots, which either causes organ failure or death, unless you're treated.
Anyone who isn't treated will eventually succumb to the effects of the clots. There are no ifs, buts, or two ways around that.
The only hope vaxxed people have is if the messengers stay local. If that's the case, they're the few lucky who will likely survive. If they don't stay local? Well, we all know what happens next... sooner or later.
EDIT: Come to think of it, and all of that being said, the only real saving grace many of the vaxxed will have is if the messengers stay local. I would love to see what the data sampling is for the vaxxed for those where the messengers stay local vs those where it didn't. I know we'll never get that data, but it would be fascinating to know what the percentage will be like for the people who may live (but with unknown long-term effects) versus the people who are already developing clots.
You have a source for any of that? Not even saying you're wrong, I'd just like to see some evidence backing it up.
Also, if that is true, and if the shedding issue is true...is humanity as a whole just fucked?
Also, follow up, what's the endgame here? Was this incompetence? Probably not, since it seems like they knew beforehand. It just seems weird that they'd target the most obedient people, or do they have a "cure" for the vaccine, or something? Is the goal lock up the unvaccinated "bioterrorists," extort the vaccinated for their lives with the cure, or something?
It's all very creepy, no matter how you slice it. But I'm still going to need to see the evidence before I jump to any conclusions.
You have a source for any of that? Not even saying you're wrong, I'd just like to see some evidence backing it up.
Yep. Dr. Hoffe observed that 62% of his vaccinated patients were developing clotting as the messengers made their way into the bloodstream (it's a short eight minute video):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ChQwQBggc8TL/
Bridle said the scientific community has discovered the spike protein, on its own, is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation.
Once in circulation, the spike protein can attach to specific ACE2 receptors that are on blood platelets and the cells that line blood vessels, Bridle said. “When that happens it can do one of two things. It can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting — that’s exactly why we’ve been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. It can also lead to bleeding,” he added.
Both clotting and bleeding are associated with vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Bridle also said the spike protein in circulation would explain recently reported heart problems in vaccinated teens.
Additional cases have now been reported to the European Medicines Agency, including at least 169 possible cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and 53 possible cases of splanchnic vein thrombosis among 34 million recipients of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, 35 possible cases of central nervous system thrombosis among 54 million recipients of the Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA vaccine, and 5 possible (but unvetted) cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis among 4 million recipients of the Moderna mRNA vaccine. Six possible cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (with or without splanchnic vein thrombosis) have been reported among the more than 7 million recipients of the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen Ad26.COV2.S adenoviral vector vaccine. It must be emphasized that not all of these case reports have been subject to rigorous central review, nor have results of tests for anti-PF4 antibodies been reported; however, these numbers may be underestimates, since reporting is voluntary. Nevertheless, they clearly indicate the need for maintaining a high level of concern when patients present with central nervous system or abdominal symptoms after receiving any SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.
There are even more sources all pointing to the same thing, but I think you get the gist. Now for this bit...
Also, follow up, what's the endgame here? Was this incompetence? Probably not, since it seems like they knew beforehand.
Not only did they know beforehand, but they noted some of these SAEs and went forward with enforcing people to take the vaccines regardless.
Refer to the November, 2020 results of Pfizer's pre-clinical trial screening tests that noted that they encountered spontaneous abortions in the placebo group of women who happened to be pregnant during testing:
https://i.imgur.com/syZFHFm.jpg
Notice how they also make note of pregnant women experiencing SAEs based on shedding on page 67.
Notice how they also make note of potential cardiovascular SAEs on page 70. What happens if an administrator encounters cardiovascular problems? Nothing.
8.3.6. Cardiovascular and Death Events
Not applicable.
How about adverse effects? Nata.
8.3.8. Adverse Events of Special Interest
Not applicable.
As I mentioned in a previous post, it's almost like those are features, not bugs.
To quote Dr. Stephanie Gaw, an assistant professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences at the University of California, San Francisco.
"The major risk is that there is no data, although scientifically, we think it's very unlikely to have any harmful effects,"
If they showed spontaneous abortions during the screening trial, and then VAERs reported dozens of pregnant women encountering spontaneous abortions after being vaccinated, it looks willfully malicious to keep recommending pregnant women to get the vaccine, no?
But wait there's more (I'm almost done, though. Sorry for making this so long, but I wanted to get it all in there in case you had any follow-up questions about the data)!
You asked a very good question about shedding...
Also, if that is true, and if the shedding issue is true...is humanity as a whole just fucked?
Yes!
Not only did Pfizer make note of the shedding, but there were Facebook groups who also reported heavy bleeding, incessant bleeding, and clots... even though they didn't get the jab. So far it appears to only have happened with women (though it could be men, it's impossible to find accurate data since it keeps getting deleted/censored by Big Tech). Women noted heavy menstrual cycles, incessant bleeding while they were off their cycle, and other issues, simply by being around women who were vaccinated.
Now, while it's easy to dismiss the shedding conspiracies, we have to circle back around to the Pfizer document... they knew about the cardiovascular issues, they knew about the spontaneous abortions, and they had a brief segment about pregnant women who may encounter issues via shedding. The question is... WHY?!
If shedding wasn't occurring, or didn't occur, why even address it for administrators in the clinical guideline? It just wouldn't appear at all.
But anyway, the shedding is a little more conspiratorial than the blood work, which is irrefutable fact at this point. In fact, the clotting from messenger vaccines was an issue that researchers were encountering all the way back in 2007 when they were doing tests. You can check out the data here:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17148587/
Notice the similarities and SAEs they found in the mice? Identical to the SAEs being reported by the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines.
So yeah, they've known this for well over a decade but still went through with trying to force people to take these things, full-well knowing the risks, even as recent as their trial screening tests from last year.
I think we'll see it at some point, honestly. Although I expect a few false flags before then. You know it's headed down the pipe; I fully expect a "antivaxxer domestic terror attack" soon, probably within a few months. And the FBI's fingerprints will be all over it.
Okay I understand that the parents were kept from seeing their baby.
But this makes it sound like it was because of something they said. In reality, this video is edited, correct? So, what probably actually happened is that they weren't vaccinated...and the hospital has a policy.
Still horrible! BUT it does our purpose no good to lie about context.
Australia already has a history of doing that very thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Generations
Sincerely hope it happens. Cant wait to watch those aussie liberals suffer.
I agree. All the suffering of the west is deserved. It will have to get A LOT worse before they reach the level of suffering the Germans and Japanese endured at the hands of the anglosphere. If they joined the correct side during WW2 none of this would be happening.
Shoot a jew on the Eastern Front, "genocide!"
Burn undefended Tokyo to a crisp with endless rolling waves of bombers, kill 100s of 1000s, nothing to see here.
The museum in Hiroshima is the most vile thing I’ve ever seen in my life. I recommend avoiding it. That tricycle. Ugh.
You're confusing the murderous and insane power establishment with regular people. Common mistake, but you should know that TPTB want people blaming themselves or each other for what are actually crimes against humanity committed by the state.
I'm very aware people were lied to and manipulated by the establishment. Good times make weak men. We need suffering to make us strong. We should have had a revolution long ago, but were too comfortable to be bothered.
wut
Carls Junior
And that's the last child they're ever going to have.
Still fifty or so more vaccinations before the kid hits puberty.
Got to provoke that incurable auto-immune disease.
While this is awful I maintain that calling every authoritarian a Nazi makes you look like a fucking clown.
'Corpse' might be a better term for them.
He's a Jew, he doesnt want to let go of that power.
By modern standards, Nazis weren't even particularly authoritarian.
I foresee a lot more home births in australia's future...
Not saying it's definite, just saying it wouldn't shock me if all of a sudden, people start having babies at home...
...quickly followed by the government saying home births are illegal.
That oughta be entertaining to see them try to enforce...
and sadly that may also lead to mothers dying during childbirth of things like preeclampsia and hemorrhage. home birth is great when nothing goes wrong.
I'm not saying it's a good or a bad thing. I'm just saying I think it's a possibility with this kind of decision by the courts...
I 100% agree with you. Home births increasing was one of the first things that came to mind upon hearing about this. Then i immediately remembered why mortality was a lot higher during birth 150 years ago 😅
There were all kinds of contributing factors. For the most part, it's pretty safe to have a baby at home nowadays, especially if you have a midwife.
Just add them to COVID deaths.
i think the only thing im impressed/suprised/dissapointed by is peoples patience in all this.
how come we dont have modern day Ted Kaczynski's do anything in roblox HD.
this. it’s stunning how subservient so many people are. like what is it going to take for them to stand the fuck up?
Well the fully vaxxed won't be around much longer anyway, so they're just going to spend their remaining days under a boot, since they didn't mind throwing experimental gene therapy into their bodies with ZERO care or caution in the world.
really amazing, isn’t it? I’m constantly remembering that we’re not even a year out from the first human trials (iirc) so we literally have zero clue what the long term outcomes might be. That fact alone is why most vaccines have to be tested for nearly 10 years before the masses are legally allowed to consume them. And saying it’s safe for pregnant women? They weren’t even included in the trials, all the data on that, if anyone is even tracking it honestly, is from the general population and it’s hasn’t been nearly long enough to know anything. People need to look up Thalidomide ffs…
I wish people would stop stating this so definitively. As someone who is completely, 100% against the vaccine and thinks it's dangerous...we don't know what it will do to people going into the future. Will there be a mass die off in two years? Completely possible, and some data even predicts that...but we don't know for sure. Stating the vaccinated people are dead men walking isn't a good argument, because there's no way to know for sure.
Yes, we do know for sure.
If the messengers get into your bloodstream, it forces your immune system to kill you. 100% of the time it results in clots, which either causes organ failure or death, unless you're treated.
Anyone who isn't treated will eventually succumb to the effects of the clots. There are no ifs, buts, or two ways around that.
The only hope vaxxed people have is if the messengers stay local. If that's the case, they're the few lucky who will likely survive. If they don't stay local? Well, we all know what happens next... sooner or later.
EDIT: Come to think of it, and all of that being said, the only real saving grace many of the vaxxed will have is if the messengers stay local. I would love to see what the data sampling is for the vaxxed for those where the messengers stay local vs those where it didn't. I know we'll never get that data, but it would be fascinating to know what the percentage will be like for the people who may live (but with unknown long-term effects) versus the people who are already developing clots.
You have a source for any of that? Not even saying you're wrong, I'd just like to see some evidence backing it up.
Also, if that is true, and if the shedding issue is true...is humanity as a whole just fucked?
Also, follow up, what's the endgame here? Was this incompetence? Probably not, since it seems like they knew beforehand. It just seems weird that they'd target the most obedient people, or do they have a "cure" for the vaccine, or something? Is the goal lock up the unvaccinated "bioterrorists," extort the vaccinated for their lives with the cure, or something?
It's all very creepy, no matter how you slice it. But I'm still going to need to see the evidence before I jump to any conclusions.
Yep. Dr. Hoffe observed that 62% of his vaccinated patients were developing clotting as the messengers made their way into the bloodstream (it's a short eight minute video): https://www.bitchute.com/video/ChQwQBggc8TL/
This was separately corroborated by immunologists at the University of Guelph, in Ontario, who discovered the exact same thing in those who had been vaccinated; once the messengers get into your bloodstream it wreaks havoc on your system due to the reaction of your immune system: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-spike-protein-travels-from-injection-site-organ-damage/
I'll quote the relevant part:
And if you think two sources aren't enough, here's a completely separate one from a New England medical journal, which came to the exact same conclusions as the immunologists from Ontario, and that Dr. Hoffe came to after he did blood work on his patients: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2106315?query=recirc_curatedRelated_article
Here's the relevant bit...
There are even more sources all pointing to the same thing, but I think you get the gist. Now for this bit...
Not only did they know beforehand, but they noted some of these SAEs and went forward with enforcing people to take the vaccines regardless.
Refer to the November, 2020 results of Pfizer's pre-clinical trial screening tests that noted that they encountered spontaneous abortions in the placebo group of women who happened to be pregnant during testing: https://i.imgur.com/syZFHFm.jpg
Notice how they make note of the spontaneous abortions, along with cardiovascular SAEs in their clinical trial guideline document on page 66: https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
Notice how they also make note of pregnant women experiencing SAEs based on shedding on page 67.
Notice how they also make note of potential cardiovascular SAEs on page 70. What happens if an administrator encounters cardiovascular problems? Nothing.
How about adverse effects? Nata.
As I mentioned in a previous post, it's almost like those are features, not bugs.
But circling back around to the spontaneous abortions... identical to what happened in the pre-trial clinical screening tests where the placebo group encountered spontaneous abortions, the exact same thing happened when pregnant women took the vaccine: https://www.theepochtimes.com/3-dozen-cases-of-spontaneous-miscarriages-stillbirths-occurring-after-covid-19-vaccination_3716385.html
Those are still occurring to this day: https://t.me/covidvaccineinjuries/1718
Despite all of that? Pfizer, Big Pharma, Big Tech, and the health authorities are still advising pregnant women to get the jab: https://www.livescience.com/pregnant-breastfeeding-covid19-vaccines.html
To quote Dr. Stephanie Gaw, an assistant professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences at the University of California, San Francisco.
If they showed spontaneous abortions during the screening trial, and then VAERs reported dozens of pregnant women encountering spontaneous abortions after being vaccinated, it looks willfully malicious to keep recommending pregnant women to get the vaccine, no?
But wait there's more (I'm almost done, though. Sorry for making this so long, but I wanted to get it all in there in case you had any follow-up questions about the data)!
You asked a very good question about shedding...
Yes!
Not only did Pfizer make note of the shedding, but there were Facebook groups who also reported heavy bleeding, incessant bleeding, and clots... even though they didn't get the jab. So far it appears to only have happened with women (though it could be men, it's impossible to find accurate data since it keeps getting deleted/censored by Big Tech). Women noted heavy menstrual cycles, incessant bleeding while they were off their cycle, and other issues, simply by being around women who were vaccinated.
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny talked a little bit about the shedding reports here, getting into the epidemiology of the shedding process: https://noqreport.com/2021/05/22/dr-sherri-tenpenny-explains-why-covid-injection-shedding-is-so-concerning/
As usual, fact-checkers claimed that shedding wasn't possible, and it was all anti-vax disinformation: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-nonsense/
This also led to Facebook shutting down any and all groups where people claimed to have encountered adverse effects, and were sharing pictures, videos, and stories about the SAEs after getting jabbed: https://reclaimthenet.org/facebook-removes-covid-19-vaccine-victims-group/
Now, while it's easy to dismiss the shedding conspiracies, we have to circle back around to the Pfizer document... they knew about the cardiovascular issues, they knew about the spontaneous abortions, and they had a brief segment about pregnant women who may encounter issues via shedding. The question is... WHY?!
If shedding wasn't occurring, or didn't occur, why even address it for administrators in the clinical guideline? It just wouldn't appear at all.
But anyway, the shedding is a little more conspiratorial than the blood work, which is irrefutable fact at this point. In fact, the clotting from messenger vaccines was an issue that researchers were encountering all the way back in 2007 when they were doing tests. You can check out the data here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17148587/
Notice the similarities and SAEs they found in the mice? Identical to the SAEs being reported by the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines.
So yeah, they've known this for well over a decade but still went through with trying to force people to take these things, full-well knowing the risks, even as recent as their trial screening tests from last year.
How crazy is that?
Thanks, I'll give it a more thorough look later, but even at a glance, that's some scary stuff. Ugh.
I think we'll see it at some point, honestly. Although I expect a few false flags before then. You know it's headed down the pipe; I fully expect a "antivaxxer domestic terror attack" soon, probably within a few months. And the FBI's fingerprints will be all over it.
#norefunds
"Allowed" to see their own kid.
Yeah, no, fuck that.
Get your shit together, people. I mean, really...
Okay I understand that the parents were kept from seeing their baby.
But this makes it sound like it was because of something they said. In reality, this video is edited, correct? So, what probably actually happened is that they weren't vaccinated...and the hospital has a policy.
Still horrible! BUT it does our purpose no good to lie about context.
But sounds like Aussies are fucked either way.
That really doesn't make it any better, and was how I interpreted this anyway.
No, fuck everything about this, it's inhumane, and they don't have the authority.