You have a source for any of that? Not even saying you're wrong, I'd just like to see some evidence backing it up.

Yep. Dr. Hoffe observed that 62% of his vaccinated patients were developing clotting as the messengers made their way into the bloodstream (it's a short eight minute video): https://www.bitchute.com/video/ChQwQBggc8TL/

This was separately corroborated by immunologists at the University of Guelph, in Ontario, who discovered the exact same thing in those who had been vaccinated; once the messengers get into your bloodstream it wreaks havoc on your system due to the reaction of your immune system: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-spike-protein-travels-from-injection-site-organ-damage/

I'll quote the relevant part:

Bridle said the scientific community has discovered the spike protein, on its own, is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation.

Once in circulation, the spike protein can attach to specific ACE2 receptors that are on blood platelets and the cells that line blood vessels, Bridle said. “When that happens it can do one of two things. It can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting — that’s exactly why we’ve been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. It can also lead to bleeding,” he added.

Both clotting and bleeding are associated with vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Bridle also said the spike protein in circulation would explain recently reported heart problems in vaccinated teens.

And if you think two sources aren't enough, here's a completely separate one from a New England medical journal, which came to the exact same conclusions as the immunologists from Ontario, and that Dr. Hoffe came to after he did blood work on his patients: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2106315?query=recirc_curatedRelated_article

Here's the relevant bit...

Additional cases have now been reported to the European Medicines Agency, including at least 169 possible cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and 53 possible cases of splanchnic vein thrombosis among 34 million recipients of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, 35 possible cases of central nervous system thrombosis among 54 million recipients of the Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA vaccine, and 5 possible (but unvetted) cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis among 4 million recipients of the Moderna mRNA vaccine. Six possible cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (with or without splanchnic vein thrombosis) have been reported among the more than 7 million recipients of the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen Ad26.COV2.S adenoviral vector vaccine. It must be emphasized that not all of these case reports have been subject to rigorous central review, nor have results of tests for anti-PF4 antibodies been reported; however, these numbers may be underestimates, since reporting is voluntary. Nevertheless, they clearly indicate the need for maintaining a high level of concern when patients present with central nervous system or abdominal symptoms after receiving any SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

There are even more sources all pointing to the same thing, but I think you get the gist. Now for this bit...

Also, follow up, what's the endgame here? Was this incompetence? Probably not, since it seems like they knew beforehand.

Not only did they know beforehand, but they noted some of these SAEs and went forward with enforcing people to take the vaccines regardless.

Refer to the November, 2020 results of Pfizer's pre-clinical trial screening tests that noted that they encountered spontaneous abortions in the placebo group of women who happened to be pregnant during testing: https://i.imgur.com/syZFHFm.jpg

Notice how they make note of the spontaneous abortions, along with cardiovascular SAEs in their clinical trial guideline document on page 66: https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

Notice how they also make note of pregnant women experiencing SAEs based on shedding on page 67.

Notice how they also make note of potential cardiovascular SAEs on page 70. What happens if an administrator encounters cardiovascular problems? Nothing.

8.3.6. Cardiovascular and Death Events Not applicable.

How about adverse effects? Nata.

8.3.8. Adverse Events of Special Interest Not applicable.

As I mentioned in a previous post, it's almost like those are features, not bugs.

But circling back around to the spontaneous abortions... identical to what happened in the pre-trial clinical screening tests where the placebo group encountered spontaneous abortions, the exact same thing happened when pregnant women took the vaccine: https://www.theepochtimes.com/3-dozen-cases-of-spontaneous-miscarriages-stillbirths-occurring-after-covid-19-vaccination_3716385.html

Those are still occurring to this day: https://t.me/covidvaccineinjuries/1718

Despite all of that? Pfizer, Big Pharma, Big Tech, and the health authorities are still advising pregnant women to get the jab: https://www.livescience.com/pregnant-breastfeeding-covid19-vaccines.html

To quote Dr. Stephanie Gaw, an assistant professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences at the University of California, San Francisco.

"The major risk is that there is no data, although scientifically, we think it's very unlikely to have any harmful effects,"

If they showed spontaneous abortions during the screening trial, and then VAERs reported dozens of pregnant women encountering spontaneous abortions after being vaccinated, it looks willfully malicious to keep recommending pregnant women to get the vaccine, no?

But wait there's more (I'm almost done, though. Sorry for making this so long, but I wanted to get it all in there in case you had any follow-up questions about the data)!

You asked a very good question about shedding...

Also, if that is true, and if the shedding issue is true...is humanity as a whole just fucked?

Yes!

Not only did Pfizer make note of the shedding, but there were Facebook groups who also reported heavy bleeding, incessant bleeding, and clots... even though they didn't get the jab. So far it appears to only have happened with women (though it could be men, it's impossible to find accurate data since it keeps getting deleted/censored by Big Tech). Women noted heavy menstrual cycles, incessant bleeding while they were off their cycle, and other issues, simply by being around women who were vaccinated.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny talked a little bit about the shedding reports here, getting into the epidemiology of the shedding process: https://noqreport.com/2021/05/22/dr-sherri-tenpenny-explains-why-covid-injection-shedding-is-so-concerning/

As usual, fact-checkers claimed that shedding wasn't possible, and it was all anti-vax disinformation: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-nonsense/

This also led to Facebook shutting down any and all groups where people claimed to have encountered adverse effects, and were sharing pictures, videos, and stories about the SAEs after getting jabbed: https://reclaimthenet.org/facebook-removes-covid-19-vaccine-victims-group/

Now, while it's easy to dismiss the shedding conspiracies, we have to circle back around to the Pfizer document... they knew about the cardiovascular issues, they knew about the spontaneous abortions, and they had a brief segment about pregnant women who may encounter issues via shedding. The question is... WHY?!

If shedding wasn't occurring, or didn't occur, why even address it for administrators in the clinical guideline? It just wouldn't appear at all.

But anyway, the shedding is a little more conspiratorial than the blood work, which is irrefutable fact at this point. In fact, the clotting from messenger vaccines was an issue that researchers were encountering all the way back in 2007 when they were doing tests. You can check out the data here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17148587/

Notice the similarities and SAEs they found in the mice? Identical to the SAEs being reported by the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines.

So yeah, they've known this for well over a decade but still went through with trying to force people to take these things, full-well knowing the risks, even as recent as their trial screening tests from last year.

How crazy is that?