I say, by experience, yes. Treat them like lepers. Whether they die themselves or kill us in greater numbers I have no idea, either way it fits with the larger plan.
I don't think there is hard data to support this. When it comes up I expect it will be scrubbed.
There's no mechanism for wifi to give one cancer. There is a mechanism for spike proteins to be shed, assuming that the nanolipids do not stay in the deltoid muscle (which they should but don't) and the spike proteins don't stay bound to the surface of the cell (which they should but don't) then if you cough you are possibly shedding spike proteins just like if you had covid you'd be shedding whole viruses.
I'm more vaccine credulous than average around here but acting like there's no mechanism for protein shedding is some NPC shit.
COVID-19 is only contagious because it self-replicates. Even if we accept for the sake of argument that it is possible for spike proteins to migrate from where they are created to your lungs, to be exhaled, to be inhaled by another person, each of those steps will by necessity have substantial losses. We know that the spike protein can't be that toxic, because that spike protein is a part of a virus with a ~1% mortality rate, so without the ability to replace those losses you're not going to have significant exposure even if any exposure exists.
"Is the shed protein dangerous" is a different question than "do they shed spike protein" which is what you answered "they do not" too. You're also assuming that the spike protein can't be more dangerous than a whole virus which may be true but not necessarily because nanoscale structures can be physically dangerous just because of their size and shape, and the spike protein is roughly the size of an asbestos fibril.
J&J is an mRNA vaccine it's just the delivery method is an adenovirus shell instead of nanolipids. I'm still less concerned about J&J though because adenoviruses can't cross the blood brain barrier and nanolipids aren't supposed to be able to either but it seems like they can.
My brother-in-law got the jab last month and was told to avoid close contact with newborns, pregnant women, or young children in general. The literature said it was due to spike protein shedding. This isn't a study but if they're own literature says it's a risk, I take that seriously.
I say, by experience, yes. Treat them like lepers. Whether they die themselves or kill us in greater numbers I have no idea, either way it fits with the larger plan.
I don't think there is hard data to support this. When it comes up I expect it will be scrubbed.
Hell I wouldn't let them near my dog.
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-vaccinated-can-shed-spike-protein-harming-unvaccinated/
They do not. Anyone who tells you they do is the same kind of idiot who five years ago would have been crying murder about WiFi giving them cancer.
There's no mechanism for wifi to give one cancer. There is a mechanism for spike proteins to be shed, assuming that the nanolipids do not stay in the deltoid muscle (which they should but don't) and the spike proteins don't stay bound to the surface of the cell (which they should but don't) then if you cough you are possibly shedding spike proteins just like if you had covid you'd be shedding whole viruses.
I'm more vaccine credulous than average around here but acting like there's no mechanism for protein shedding is some NPC shit.
COVID-19 is only contagious because it self-replicates. Even if we accept for the sake of argument that it is possible for spike proteins to migrate from where they are created to your lungs, to be exhaled, to be inhaled by another person, each of those steps will by necessity have substantial losses. We know that the spike protein can't be that toxic, because that spike protein is a part of a virus with a ~1% mortality rate, so without the ability to replace those losses you're not going to have significant exposure even if any exposure exists.
"Is the shed protein dangerous" is a different question than "do they shed spike protein" which is what you answered "they do not" too. You're also assuming that the spike protein can't be more dangerous than a whole virus which may be true but not necessarily because nanoscale structures can be physically dangerous just because of their size and shape, and the spike protein is roughly the size of an asbestos fibril.
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-vaccinated-can-shed-spike-protein-harming-unvaccinated/
Covaxin isn't that safe either.
It killed an Indian actor named Vivek.
https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/vaccine-hesitancy-rises-after-viveks-death-how-tn-authorities-are-dealing-it-148639
It's the standard issue with any medicine, you have to test it properly before you introduce it to the mass public.
J&J is an mRNA vaccine it's just the delivery method is an adenovirus shell instead of nanolipids. I'm still less concerned about J&J though because adenoviruses can't cross the blood brain barrier and nanolipids aren't supposed to be able to either but it seems like they can.
Wait, so how are the spike proteins transmitted? Is it airborne? What does "close contact" mean specifically?
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-vaccinated-can-shed-spike-protein-harming-unvaccinated/
My brother-in-law got the jab last month and was told to avoid close contact with newborns, pregnant women, or young children in general. The literature said it was due to spike protein shedding. This isn't a study but if they're own literature says it's a risk, I take that seriously.
The No Agenda podcast has talked about this. I think this chapter might be where it was, about shedding spiek proteins and exosomes:
https://www.noagendashow.net/listen/1362?t=38:08