If you incentivize something, you will get more of it. I am not sure how the bloody obvious is not understood by politicians, unless it is to their advantage to have an atomized society without the strong bonds of family - or religion.
I'm divorced and not by my choice.
The courts are stuck in the 1850s. They rule as though a woman cannot take care of herself. If you married her and she doesn't want you any more, you MUST take care of her until she finds another sucker to marry her.
I'll never take a so called 'feminist' seriously until they start opposing this but they never will because it works in their favor.
I would very much like to get married again someday, but it's hard to imagine giving someone that kind of power over me again.
The situation benefits women and women are the majority of voters. Look for it to get worse, not better. Maybe they will try taxing bachelors to punish men who don't submit to divorce-rape.
This stops when men stop it. 85% of men believe women have just enough or not enough rights. These are the cucks that will fight other men to defend m'lady.
You can't fight nature. If our men won't do it, it'll be the invading forces of patriarchal cultures that never gave the vote to women, establish strong familial binds, and have birth rates that dwarf the pathetic western world's rates that fall short of full replacement as they are.
I don't think the madness will necessarily be pushed back, so much as it will consume itself, and the purpose of gender roles and familial contracts will re-establish as a matter of course in a much less pleasant environment.
If you incentivize something, you will get more of it. I am not sure how the bloody obvious is not understood by politicians, unless it is to their advantage to have an atomized society without the strong bonds of family - or religion.
This seems painfully obvious to me, but here's the question that helped me figure it out. "Why do communists hate religion?"
They don't. They hate other religions. They are one.
Pretty much.
Look how venerated beings like Putin, Kim or CCP are in their respective countries.
Well I wonder how we could fix that problem?
I'm divorced and not by my choice. The courts are stuck in the 1850s. They rule as though a woman cannot take care of herself. If you married her and she doesn't want you any more, you MUST take care of her until she finds another sucker to marry her. I'll never take a so called 'feminist' seriously until they start opposing this but they never will because it works in their favor. I would very much like to get married again someday, but it's hard to imagine giving someone that kind of power over me again.
Why would feminists oppose a system that is as they designed it?
Divorce courts now follow dictates set by older generations of feminists.
The situation benefits women and women are the majority of voters. Look for it to get worse, not better. Maybe they will try taxing bachelors to punish men who don't submit to divorce-rape.
This stops when men stop it. 85% of men believe women have just enough or not enough rights. These are the cucks that will fight other men to defend m'lady.
You can't fight nature. If our men won't do it, it'll be the invading forces of patriarchal cultures that never gave the vote to women, establish strong familial binds, and have birth rates that dwarf the pathetic western world's rates that fall short of full replacement as they are.
A harrowing yet accurate prediction.
I don't think the madness will necessarily be pushed back, so much as it will consume itself, and the purpose of gender roles and familial contracts will re-establish as a matter of course in a much less pleasant environment.
What is the prerequisite for divorce? A marriage license. Now compare who's suggesting the marriage licenses and who's benefiting from the divorces?