Pump up the National Anthem as you send some T-72s to go kill some US backed "rebels".
Just a reminder that Syrian Warfare is a Russian propaganda game but it's a pretty good Men at War clone.
There is no such thing as a fraudulent election. Kim Jung Un got an even greater percentage of the votes. This is just incitement to violence by 'journalist'.
It probably was fairly fraudulent. First, nobody gets 95% of the vote without fraud unless you are running unopposed.
Second, there's a fundamental problem with a democratic election in a civil war. Your opposition can't vote for someone else if you are shooting at them.
they are false flags, those chemical attacks happened even after he gave all of it up and always happened when he was about to win a battle (to use as an excuse to try to get western powers to intervene). And even if you ignore all that, the people he's fighting are ISIS types. You want to support that?
No, Assad never used chemical weapons against any ISIS/IS territories. He mostly ignored them altogether at the time when they were mostly fighting against the Sunni rebels and Kurdish separatists.
Yeah. It sucks Syria's a dictatorship but damn it the Arabs, Berbers, none of those ethnic groups have the cultural capacity, values, or infrastructure to support an actual Western-style republic. It's better for stability and the small folk over there that they have a (relatively) secular strong-man in charge instead of one of the many Islamic terror groups.
edit: man I swear i member reading something about the al-assad family being descended from Berbers or whatever. its past my bedtime so that will forever remain a mystery for the rest of the night
Surely they don't want to audit the votes? That would undermine democracy.
Perhaps they want the Libyan slavers to expand their buisness.
There is no such thing as a fraudulent election. Kim Jung Un got an even greater percentage of the votes. This is just incitement to violence by 'journalist'.
Hey! Questioning election results goes against the terms of service of Big Tech!
There's totally precedent for it! Italy's Fascist Party had 99% of the vote, with a 1% margin of error.
Saddam got 100.0% and Kadyrov (and Putin in Kadyrovs turf) even more than that.
Expecting democracy in an Islamic nation is like expecting honesty from a rapist.
If the Afghans like their Taliban, they can keep their Taliban.
Kinda shocked by the look of these alleged policemen. Expected these communist-era shitty uniforms but got just nothing at all.
I mean, didn't everyone who don't vote for him leave to get free stuff in Germany and rest of Europe? That's actually believable at this point.
Do they have stocks in Dominion voting machines.
It probably was fairly fraudulent. First, nobody gets 95% of the vote without fraud unless you are running unopposed.
Second, there's a fundamental problem with a democratic election in a civil war. Your opposition can't vote for someone else if you are shooting at them.
Hey! He's gotten 2% less than in 2006!
I'm genuinely curious if that's more or less people based on how he's measuring the percentage of votes.
Saddam just declared that literally everyone voted and all of them voted for him.
It didn't matter northern Iraqi Kurdistan wasn't even participating obviously, because he said they all voted too.
no, you don't get to call this fraudulent while not allowing audits of our most recent election.
"fraudulent" is a code word for "we don't like the result"
they are false flags, those chemical attacks happened even after he gave all of it up and always happened when he was about to win a battle (to use as an excuse to try to get western powers to intervene). And even if you ignore all that, the people he's fighting are ISIS types. You want to support that?
No, Assad never used chemical weapons against any ISIS/IS territories. He mostly ignored them altogether at the time when they were mostly fighting against the Sunni rebels and Kurdish separatists.
Your brain is rotten out by Russian propaganda.
Yeah. It sucks Syria's a dictatorship but damn it the Arabs, Berbers, none of those ethnic groups have the cultural capacity, values, or infrastructure to support an actual Western-style republic. It's better for stability and the small folk over there that they have a (relatively) secular strong-man in charge instead of one of the many Islamic terror groups.
"Berbers"? In Syria?
Sure why not ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
edit: man I swear i member reading something about the al-assad family being descended from Berbers or whatever. its past my bedtime so that will forever remain a mystery for the rest of the night
Turk detected
EEEEYYYYYYYYYY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgiyWGyJcIc