Weimar 2.0 incoming
(nypost.com)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
I just do not see it. You can get accused of sexual assault if you look to much at a girl, this has been cemented in the minds of teenagers. Only degeneracy I see the left embracing is part of the LGBTPIPQ+.
Have you noticed how strict the left is on normal sex but they are willing to allow pedophilia, infecting others with HIV, sexual predators, public sex and all that as long as it is from the alphabet people?
I agree with you completely on this.
It will only be the rise of more degeneracy.
There won't be much monogamous heterosexual sex in the future.
How long until the tiny hats start to mass clone themselves?
Everyone loses from that position.
Bitterness alone will win us nothing
Feminists have won a lot because they have been useful to globalist interests. Is a mutual beneficial arrangement that can break at any time. Keep in mind that globalists do not share power.
Bro, ease up a little. I understand this is personal for you, but consider the effectiveness of your appeal. Most people want to avoid scorched earth policy.
We don't need to go back or "forward", we can jump off the rollercoaster with some courage and planning.
Finding a place to live with a decent legal framework is a monumental task, so yeah, you're not wrong to have a bleak outlook. Everything is kinda shit, too, but advocating scorched earth practice isn't much different to telling your fellows to give up. I think it's better to support each other and bolster morale, which IS different from spreading false hopes or encouraging surrender.
I'm also kinda concerned about you, you take in a lot of this negativity and I don't know that you have a healthy outlet for your stress.
I went back to college as a mature student a few years back. All the men around the age of 18 to about 21 honestly didn't look at women. It wasn't just the cuck types, it applied to normal non betas too. It was something I was honestly flabbergasted by, as it defied nature, yet it was real. Saying that, it was a great example of how deep down the feminist well we are.
I think that has more to do with fear than anything.
I'm not going to take the stance of TheImpossible1 and say that all woman are scum, but nowadays I would stay well clear of college aged woman. As you said, there's just too much risk involved to either your school or professional career with unaccountable accusations and the profs teaching them that men are evil sexist pigs. If anything, it's the best time to slap down any potential advances with their own rhetoric, tell them that you can't go out with them because it would be enforcing the patriarchy, all sex is rape, and/or use the Mike Pence Rule.
They're so terrified of COVID, but AIDS? Just a "thang".
That's what gets me. If it has to do with sex, it's fine. Disgusting monkeys, all around.
Whilst it wouldn't be entirely the same (History does not repeat...but it can rhyme...) if the elites don't buck their ideas up and get this ever unfolding train crash under control, then you may well have young, blackshirted men fighting Communists in the streets at some point in the near future.
And when they get called "racist" or "fascist", this lot will shout back "I don't care." (Bonus points for anyone who gets the reference).
That'll be the real "New Normal" if the Left don't grow up. Can't say they wouldn't have earned it if it happened.
Biggest reason I never wanted anything to do with the "community"
I always cringed and kept distance from them in university despite their best Motte arguments for raimbow stickers solidarity BS.
Like there was gay bashing at Universities that needed adressing. Lol.
This Yale professor defends authoritarian lockdowns and thinks that by 2024 there will be even MORE sexual degeneracy than what we already have.
This Yale professor is a Cartesian demon. Academia delenda est.
Dude excuses authoritarianism as merely window dressing to normal human behaviour. I don't buy it.
Just want it noted that it's a link to an article that's selling a book. That should be all you need to know.
First of all, nice grift from a Yale professor. This book can be nothing but speculation. We haven’t returned to anything near normal yet, so pondering the long term effects is pointless guess work.
Secondly, where the hell has this bozo been for the last 10 years? Did he miss the rampant hedonism powered by “dating” apps, and the skyrocketing levels of STDs that have gone along with them?
Oh, good, by the time WW3 rolls around I'll be too old to conscript.
They'll probably just make me into rations.
I don't think isolating kids and crippling their development will make them prone to socializing more over the long term. Especially not boys, who are less "people-inclined". Maby young women will want to overcompensate in the social department. Guys less so, but may overcompensate in the non-constructive risk-taking department.
They won't start buisnesses en-masse, leftists ruined that allmpver the West with lockdowns.
My assumption is that it will worsen the trend to use technology as a filter between them and other people.
WoW is often joked as parent's dream "chastity and drug abstinence" program.
Well with the irrational WuFlu fear regarding kids ( less risk than influenza for under 30's ) governments and parents shoved their kids in front of screens for several extra hours every day. That's gonna leave a mark.
I jokes about keeping schools open and simply making a 2 weeks WuFlu pijamma party at school when the virus roams, to get it over with, without exposing adults.
The Metoo cult will most likely be pegging cucked leftist "men" in the streets by 2024.
This is what we will see in the future.
Fucking clown world.
Was it george carlin said "never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers"?