He has a fetish for imagining himself as the damsel victim of the Nazi Orange like the half-dressed, big boob women on the covers of those trashy old books.
/b/ has shown me that there are a surprising amount of sissys/trannies with a fetish for political BDSM of "strong conservative man pounds lib holes."
And that's just the ones with the self awareness and lack of shame to admit to it, which means its probably magnitudes more common and unannounced or unnoticed.
So this entire Orange Man Bad thing could be sexual fetishes manifesting.
It's not completely off. Fundamentally, I suspect it has to do with insecure man-children who don't have strong father figures and are effectively fetishizing an emotional disconnect, are sexually abused children actually attempting to re-enact some kind of abuse as a form of normalcy bias in their own sexual development, or are older women who have no authoritative male partner in their lives and are grasping at violence/authoritarianism/tyranny as a substitute.
That last part is particularly a problem because the political swings of women between women who are married and women who are unmarried tend to swing wildly to the right when married, then back to the left when unmarried, and that trend continues regardless of the number of marriages.
That last part is particularly a problem because the political swings of women between women who are married and women who are unmarried tend to swing wildly to the right when married, then back to the left when unmarried
Thats because women dont make their own political decisions and always differ to authority, if there is a conservative male figure in the home (father / husband) women will swing Right... when living alone women default to seeing Feminism their authority and so swing Left
I think you're being too reductionist. They don't defer to authority, they are looking for a provider. Notice, I didn't say "when the husband was conservative". It was "married at all".
When women are married, man = provider. This necessitates strong masculine values and policies that would promote an individual man's success. Which aligns with many conservative, or even libertarian values. When the woman is unmarried, provider = state/society. This necessitates a strong governmental protection racket which preferentially treats women generally, in the hopes that some specific women (the women voters) will benefit.
If they haven't done it for four years with Trump in the WH, why would they start doing it now? Especially if Trump loses and they wouldn't have cover?
There is absolutely no question in my mind that multiple Pogroms will be attempted by Leftists in the next 4 years. Either by partisan racial pogroms from Black National Socialists, institutional racialist laws that will intentionally disproportionately target specific ethnic groups that are showing resistance to Leftist racialists, redilined districts identified by quarantine fiat, or (potentially) by direct executive order.
And yes, Jews specifically are going to be a major target.
Well Obama himself criticized harshly all the Hispanic people who voted for Trump.
So I guess it will be the usual hatred against White men with Hispanics, Asians and Orthodox Jews joining the bottom of the "progressive" oppression stack.
They're all "passing white" anyways. Black National Socialists have been promoting voluntary sonderkomandos for a while now, and they are expecting some more volunteers from each group.
These people want to be the final arbiters of race in the world, and use Lebanon as a guide for government.
Are we finally gonna get to see all those roving bands of deathsquads that the Left promised us were just around the corner at all times over the last 4 years?
Nice Girl Pattern Baldness by the way.
Hell, Michael Jackson looked more female-passing than that dude does.
Top kek of the day. Thanks for starting my day with a smile and a wee slice of snark.
Girl? Thats 100% a guy.
It is ironic. 'Girl pattern baldness' is a term used by the gender critical people to refer to a bald man who proclaims to be a woman.
Waaahoooosh :P
He has a fetish for imagining himself as the damsel victim of the Nazi Orange like the half-dressed, big boob women on the covers of those trashy old books.
/b/ has shown me that there are a surprising amount of sissys/trannies with a fetish for political BDSM of "strong conservative man pounds lib holes."
And that's just the ones with the self awareness and lack of shame to admit to it, which means its probably magnitudes more common and unannounced or unnoticed.
So this entire Orange Man Bad thing could be sexual fetishes manifesting.
It's not completely off. Fundamentally, I suspect it has to do with insecure man-children who don't have strong father figures and are effectively fetishizing an emotional disconnect, are sexually abused children actually attempting to re-enact some kind of abuse as a form of normalcy bias in their own sexual development, or are older women who have no authoritative male partner in their lives and are grasping at violence/authoritarianism/tyranny as a substitute.
That last part is particularly a problem because the political swings of women between women who are married and women who are unmarried tend to swing wildly to the right when married, then back to the left when unmarried, and that trend continues regardless of the number of marriages.
Thats because women dont make their own political decisions and always differ to authority, if there is a conservative male figure in the home (father / husband) women will swing Right... when living alone women default to seeing Feminism their authority and so swing Left
I think you're being too reductionist. They don't defer to authority, they are looking for a provider. Notice, I didn't say "when the husband was conservative". It was "married at all".
When women are married, man = provider. This necessitates strong masculine values and policies that would promote an individual man's success. Which aligns with many conservative, or even libertarian values. When the woman is unmarried, provider = state/society. This necessitates a strong governmental protection racket which preferentially treats women generally, in the hopes that some specific women (the women voters) will benefit.
So women are pieces of shit politically got it.
Says the people that'll accelerate the rioting even more if they lose, or make lists of people to put into "re-education camps" if they win.
Projection once again from the left.
The projection isn't hidden by the foundation and wig anymore than the five o'clock shadow and the male pattern baldness are.
YOU SHALL NOT PASS!
If they haven't done it for four years with Trump in the WH, why would they start doing it now? Especially if Trump loses and they wouldn't have cover?
If only...
Progressives always project.
There is absolutely no question in my mind that multiple Pogroms will be attempted by Leftists in the next 4 years. Either by partisan racial pogroms from Black National Socialists, institutional racialist laws that will intentionally disproportionately target specific ethnic groups that are showing resistance to Leftist racialists, redilined districts identified by quarantine fiat, or (potentially) by direct executive order.
And yes, Jews specifically are going to be a major target.
Well Obama himself criticized harshly all the Hispanic people who voted for Trump.
So I guess it will be the usual hatred against White men with Hispanics, Asians and Orthodox Jews joining the bottom of the "progressive" oppression stack.
They're all "passing white" anyways. Black National Socialists have been promoting voluntary sonderkomandos for a while now, and they are expecting some more volunteers from each group.
These people want to be the final arbiters of race in the world, and use Lebanon as a guide for government.
Are we finally gonna get to see all those roving bands of deathsquads that the Left promised us were just around the corner at all times over the last 4 years?
promise???