They could stop having sex or get the surgeries to not get pregnant or get someone pregnant since they hate kids so much. Then if they do want to have sex, they can do it with only people who also have had surgery to not have children. Why is their go-to answer always temporary birth control and then kill a child?
I do have a question here, as I'm unsure of the particulars of the US law on the matter.
Does Roe vs Wade address the legality - or not - of abortions or does it address state funding of those abortions? It often seems like the two sides are arguing about completely different points on this matter and I seem to fall squarely down the middle of both.
I don't personally believe that abortion should be illegal, but on the other hand I'm not sure it's just to tax all parties for something such as this.
The magic answer to this bullshit is: STOP FUCKING
Seriously, people want restrictions on abortion services because they don't want them to be abused by retards who should not be using them, and also because the procedure is EXTREMELY disgusting.
If we are at the point of such hedonism that people cannot stop fucking everything they see at any moment to properly think through the consequences, then its probably for the best that the West dies out.
And that all positions held must have popular level support or be doomed to failure, they can never start with small changes branching out.
If we are at the point of such hedonism that people cannot stop fucking everything they see at any moment to properly think through the consequences
Can you imagine? Some men are even willing to have sex with morbidly obese women, so desperate are they.
So the hedonism exists, though I don't think there is much hedonism in chubby-chasing, more like punishing yourself. Either you deal with the hedonism or not, but to act as though it did not exist is political suicide.
And that all positions held must have popular level support or be doomed to failure, they can never start with small changes branching out.
I think it was Abraham Lincoln said that you can never get too far ahead of where the 'public mind' is at. So you may want to combat hedonism, I'd support that, but as long as it exists, having a platform that assumes that it doesn't is not going to work.
Too many idiots fuck each other and become parents. All these girls that went after chads in the end want kids after they had all the fun become worthless single parents. That's not healthy for the society. Like everything in life, you need to draw a line how much hedonism you can have.
Can you imagine? Some men are even willing to have sex with morbidly obese women.
I can, I'm he. I also know how to wrap my tool and make sure babies ain't being made. I have strange tastes and I indulge as need be.
but as long as it exists, having a platform that assumes that it doesn't is not going to work.
Nobody assumes it doesn't. Where are you even getting the idea people that think hedonism doesn't exist? How is telling people to control themselves reaching that to you?
I can, I'm he. I also know how to wrap my tool and make sure babies ain't being made. I have strange tastes and I indulge as need be.
I thought you were against hedonism.
Nobody assumes it doesn't. Where are you even getting the idea people that think hedonism doesn't exist? How is telling people to control themselves reaching that to you?
If your justification for banning abortion is to tell people "just stop fucking", then that is just assuming it away.
No, I'm against wanton hedonism without care for consequence, and the idea of having other people fund your hedonism.
If your justification for banning abortion is to tell people "just stop fucking", then that is just assuming it away.
Also no, because you yourself are assuming two major untruths. That all sex must make a baby, and all those babies must be aborted. Neither of those have to happen, or infact commonly happen.
If you cannot figure out how to minimize the risk of the first to near zero, you should stop fucking. If only to keep your tard genes out of the pool.
God is real.
The only way to remove hysteria from women is to remove women.
Lets be honest, no one thought the replacement will be less woke. But the only game I liked was Redemption so I was not hyped about it to begin with.
They could stop having sex or get the surgeries to not get pregnant or get someone pregnant since they hate kids so much. Then if they do want to have sex, they can do it with only people who also have had surgery to not have children. Why is their go-to answer always temporary birth control and then kill a child?
An older one, but still relevant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_V-5syG_YA&feature=emb_logo
Let's face it, we all knew it'd be shit when we saw the design for Damsel ;_;
I do have a question here, as I'm unsure of the particulars of the US law on the matter.
Does Roe vs Wade address the legality - or not - of abortions or does it address state funding of those abortions? It often seems like the two sides are arguing about completely different points on this matter and I seem to fall squarely down the middle of both.
I don't personally believe that abortion should be illegal, but on the other hand I'm not sure it's just to tax all parties for something such as this.
Hmmm.
The magic answer to this bullshit is: STOP FUCKING
Seriously, people want restrictions on abortion services because they don't want them to be abused by retards who should not be using them, and also because the procedure is EXTREMELY disgusting.
And that is why your position will never reach any good level of support, because most men will not be happy if women "stop fucking".
If we are at the point of such hedonism that people cannot stop fucking everything they see at any moment to properly think through the consequences, then its probably for the best that the West dies out.
And that all positions held must have popular level support or be doomed to failure, they can never start with small changes branching out.
Can you imagine? Some men are even willing to have sex with morbidly obese women, so desperate are they.
So the hedonism exists, though I don't think there is much hedonism in chubby-chasing, more like punishing yourself. Either you deal with the hedonism or not, but to act as though it did not exist is political suicide.
I think it was Abraham Lincoln said that you can never get too far ahead of where the 'public mind' is at. So you may want to combat hedonism, I'd support that, but as long as it exists, having a platform that assumes that it doesn't is not going to work.
Too many idiots fuck each other and become parents. All these girls that went after chads in the end want kids after they had all the fun become worthless single parents. That's not healthy for the society. Like everything in life, you need to draw a line how much hedonism you can have.
I can, I'm he. I also know how to wrap my tool and make sure babies ain't being made. I have strange tastes and I indulge as need be.
Nobody assumes it doesn't. Where are you even getting the idea people that think hedonism doesn't exist? How is telling people to control themselves reaching that to you?
I thought you were against hedonism.
If your justification for banning abortion is to tell people "just stop fucking", then that is just assuming it away.
No, I'm against wanton hedonism without care for consequence, and the idea of having other people fund your hedonism.
Also no, because you yourself are assuming two major untruths. That all sex must make a baby, and all those babies must be aborted. Neither of those have to happen, or infact commonly happen.
If you cannot figure out how to minimize the risk of the first to near zero, you should stop fucking. If only to keep your tard genes out of the pool.