Man made climate change isn't fake. We overload the Earth's carbon cycle by 2-4%. Interestingly enough, the Earth's carbon cycle seems to flex when carbon levels raise, increasing its capacity to cycle. I'm sure there's a limit on this, and we could probably reach runaway levels unchecked, but the models vastly overestimate the danger we're in right now, because the planet is more dynamic than the models account for.
The reason they use "climate change" as a buzzword now is because the climate is literally always changing. It might have some periods where it's fairly stagnant, but it will always change eventually.
If huge companies took rising sea levels seriously they'd remove all their investments in countries and islands with low sea levels.
Carbon Dioxide is not a strong greenhouse gas, the spectrum of absorption/re-radiation for it is not all that broad, and therefore the graph of its increase in the atmosphere relative to warming is logarithmic.... Most of the warming is already "baked in" and as more is added there is exponentially diminishing returns. Even if CO2 were 4-5x its current levels warming would not increase much more than it must given current trajectories.
Might as well just title it “the intersection between any crisis, real or imagined, and leftists trying to snap implement communism without bothering with those pesky elections”.
Jesus Christ. Is there anything that doesn't affect black, latino, and indigenous people worse? It's almost like these guys aren't suited for modernity.
Dont forget killing nuclear for gas companies
I'm old enough to remember how we were all supposed to freeze in a new ice age....
"Grandpa, tell me the story about how overpopulation was going to lead to mass starvation again"
Well, then, Unicef and Care can pack up and shut the fuck up, then.
It's crap like this that makes me completely write off these crisises as not worth caring about.
But muh "science" and the "experts"!
Man made climate change isn't fake. We overload the Earth's carbon cycle by 2-4%. Interestingly enough, the Earth's carbon cycle seems to flex when carbon levels raise, increasing its capacity to cycle. I'm sure there's a limit on this, and we could probably reach runaway levels unchecked, but the models vastly overestimate the danger we're in right now, because the planet is more dynamic than the models account for.
The reason they use "climate change" as a buzzword now is because the climate is literally always changing. It might have some periods where it's fairly stagnant, but it will always change eventually.
If huge companies took rising sea levels seriously they'd remove all their investments in countries and islands with low sea levels.
Carbon Dioxide is not a strong greenhouse gas, the spectrum of absorption/re-radiation for it is not all that broad, and therefore the graph of its increase in the atmosphere relative to warming is logarithmic.... Most of the warming is already "baked in" and as more is added there is exponentially diminishing returns. Even if CO2 were 4-5x its current levels warming would not increase much more than it must given current trajectories.
There is a reason they are called watermelons.
Might as well just title it “the intersection between any crisis, real or imagined, and leftists trying to snap implement communism without bothering with those pesky elections”.
Is that where they set the fires? At the intersection of Climate Crisis and Social Justice?
Breathe deep, it's the smell of equity! (The pain lets you know it's working.)
The only "intersection" I'm interested in is gunfire with libtard heads.
Jesus Christ. Is there anything that doesn't affect black, latino, and indigenous people worse? It's almost like these guys aren't suited for modernity.