Our reps are bought and paid for, and not with our tax dollars. I don't want to spend less on their salaries. I want to pay 10x as many of them, so there are too many for Pfizer and Exxon and Disney to buy the laws they want.
You think that they can't afford to buy more of them? Lmao. They just buy more and wait for the return on investment when the government throws them dozens more sweetheart deals down the line. Cant wait to see who's cokehead son becomes the middleman next. Or like they did with Ukraine, piss money into a shitcoin and use that shitcoin to funnel the money back to the DNC as donations.
We can't afford any of it. We're paying it all with funny money, and everybody just keeps pretending it means anything when 90% of all currency was minted in the last 10 or 15 years.
My point was more that there are a dozen better places to cut spending, if not more. At least social security and social disability programs are programs that directly help the people with the tax money put into them. I don't see how having the US army / Airforce be the largest employer of single mothers, is doing anything for the general public good or the combat readiness of our country. I do see how that is probably having a lot to do with the feminizing of our fighting force or how our armed services are becoming top heavy with too many fucking officers, and too few grunts. The people actually getting shot at and risking life have nowhere to be promoted to stateside because it's being taken up by some kind of 3-dick-riding whale. Or how we're mothballing perfectly good tanks and jets just so we can make more, so a defense contractor can make stealth payments to congressmen by buying their books.
Why cut off the funny money starting with the elderly first, knowing it'll fall on our backs to prop up the elderly in that case... and the gov wont cut our taxes to do that. They'll spend the retirement money on more defense contract non-sense.
We can't afford to do these things because the State robs us at gunpoint on the pretense of doing these things, and not only does it do that poorly, it skims off the top, the bottom, and the sides at the same time.
Again though, why start with one of the few pretenses that directly benefit the public and actually DOES help some of the public? I know those on medicaid and are at or below 200% poverty line are pretty fucking grateful their cancer has to be treated, they can't be denied treatment, and the costs of that get to be written off. Meanwhile places like the UK put these people on hospice care and wait for them to die. Or Canada encourages them to suicide.
Joe Namath called, and he'd like to talk to you about reverse mortgages, so you can sell your home to the bank and still live in it, making sure your kids don't inherit a cent or get a less-inflated housing market.
They've been around since 1961. They're not the reason for the housing market troubles. In anything, I'd sooner point to the gov looking the other way while big donating companies like blackrock run AirBnB through subsidiaries.
It's hilarious, I can't run a car repair garage out of my home. Can't run a kitchen or a restaurant. It's not zoned for that. I'd never get a permit and I'd never be allowed to continue once caught... but somehow, fucking somehow, it's okay to run a hostel in a neighborhood for instagram thots. Want homes back on the market? Demand the equal enforcement of zoning laws.
I also find it women-most-affected conditions get social security disability the easiest. MS? Sure! Autism? Fuck off unless you're a danger to the public. Never mind only 16% are able to work full time and the life expectancy for autistic people is less than 45.
There's so much wrong with what you're advocating even if they reasons are good reasons.
I want boomers to retire. We all should. You know why you never got promoted as fast as you should have? Because boomers. You want to know why you or your family/friends aren't bank managers, branch managers, regional managers? Because you have some 60 year old keeping the seat warm.
There is a housing crisis. A lack of family homes. A huge part of that is that boomers keep hold of their homes, turn their extra rooms into offices, yoga studios, etc, after their kids move out and end up trying to raise kids in a 2 bedroom apartment. You know what gets a boomer to sell their home? Retiring and realizing they cannot have any fun with what money is left after paying their bills each month. They downsize. That frees up a home and reduces the demand, and that reduces the costs of homes.
To keep the elderly working is unnatural and actually upsets the progression people have in homes and in the workplace. It needs to stop. The only people that actually benefit from this system is the government and multinational business barons.
Accepting the premise that we can't afford to pay social security or medicare is just fucking stupid. We can. We can afford all the bullshit for the Ukraine. We can afford all the bullshit for nato. We can afford all the bullshit for pet projects on gay lesbian tapdancing studies... but we can't afford to pay out retirement to the elderly and we can't afford to care for the disabled? Bullshit. Meanwhile these motherfuckers vote to give themselves a raise every fucking midterms and every fucking primaries.
Austerity measures should start with out representatives. Why the fuck should each of the 400+ representatives in congress get 170k when they should be learning to survive on 70k so they can connect with their constituents and their struggles? Why don't they have to buy healthcare through the marketplace?
It's a false dichotomy. We have no need to burn retirement. They're selling us that like so they can re-appropriate the tax funds for other projects. You know who it'll fall on to take care of our destitute parents? Us. So it isn't even a victory you can sit there and smugly enjoy. Not while it falls on you to change the diapers of grammy and grampy.
As I said elsewhere. Overton window. You're not going to get to absolute free speech in one leap. You have to do what the liberals did, walk society in the direct you want. Walk. Not sprint.
Sprinting spooks the sheep.
Rumble doesn't want disaffected liberals to come to the site for the first time and see a stormfag is literally a top streamer.
I'll take 90% free speech over 0% free speech. The platform you're asking for is too radical to exist right now and we have to progress in that direction. We can't warp there. The left go away with so much because they were willing to slow-walk, and make manifest the slippery slope.
We have to slippery slope ourselves back to free speech absolutism.
Close enough to the truth. To even approach being conservative in a system that feeds your narcissism constantly, you need to be aware your shit can stink. I'm not talking about AWFLs who are conservative because their sugar daddy is.
They don't need to kick out their kid. They need to stop paying for that kid to go to college. I 100% guarantee they were raised pretty well, but then the kid went to college and got infected by the woke mind virus. Since they're talking about a BA and being an undergrad, this person must have gotten past the associates milestone. Since universities require some woke courses for 1st and 2nd year students now, I have zero doubt that the brainwashing has started.
Make that trans "brother" go find out how hard it is to work as a bus boy. Let that trans "brother" find out how much the attractive greeter makes, doing way less gross work and services. Let that trans "brother" find out how much in tips the waitresses get. I have zero doubt he'll want to be a she, again.
I think they're not wanting the eldest to take it's siblings to the car to engage in prohibited activities. Especially since the car contents fall under the legal responsibility of the title holder while parked on their property. Anything illicit that gets found in there is going to be assumed to be property of title holder.
What's wild is how she thinks that dating needs to get better for her gender. They have the pick of the litter on social media, any dating apps, and any dating website. Endless sympathy if anything bad happens, default custody if kids are involved, and it is socially acceptable for them to just crank through guys to get a free meal each and every night of the week.
What ruins her dating world? The idea that a guy might not go one by one, but I assume she thinks there is no such need for girls to.
So lemme get this right.
AWDTSG. = Are we dating the same guy.
Social media affluent sciz-hoe chicks mad that men are probably dating around the same way they are, and they want to put a stop to guys having options.
Meanwhile, I'm pretty sure there isn't a bro-code group where guys are alerting each other to the fact that the girl is rotating free meal tickets.
That about the size of it? The only thing I truly hate about this is I bet a lot of girls who get broken up with, they're going to put their ex-boyfriends up as pieces of shit and it wont be true at all.
In fact, if a guy is on a dating app and managing to pull puss at such an advanced rate, I imagine that hoes mad that they're all after a top 20%er and that a 20%er isn't fucking around when it comes to finding a good match. Sucks getting treated like you're disposable, right ladies?
The response limit / reset is to prevent reasoning the AI into proving a point. I'd bet there is a character limit too. To prevent big prompts like DAN. Every statement it initially makes is a statement that likely follows it's SJW guidelines. So say you start feeding it a chain of hypothetical rhetorical questions after getting it to spoon feed you relevant real world statistics running parallel to your hypothetical. When you ask it to give you a new answer based upon it's previous rule-abiding answers, it might just commit a thought crime.
I'd be willing to bet they paid people to try to jailbreak it and then took metrics on how many prompts it took, on average, to accomplish it. It probably took around 25 or 30 steps, and so the designers put the logic limit to 15 as a margin of safety.
Reminder that "Born this way" came from a think tank who's sole purpose was to counteract the then-successful christian campaign that was using the slogan "Poor life choice", highlighting how choosing to engage in homosexuality put somebody at greater risk of poverty, disease, childlessness and loneliness.
Not that I have a dog in the fight, but it would've been nice if there was a nugget of scientific truth to it... but instead we got a reaction/fabrication and any science backing it up after the fact was made-to-order NuScience.
He's running a pyramid scheme basically.
That said, the only reason they give a shit is because Andrew Tate speaks too many truths about the mindset and socially trained behavior of modern American women and the scientific fact that is hypergamy. It's become cool to dunk on the dude and mock his takes in clips just as much as it's become cool to promote him since promoting him gets you more pyramid scheme money, literally speaking.
Registered just to reply because I get you. You don't have options here.
Redman, the number one thing they found with blood clots and all the other systemic inflammation issues is that the root cause of that was that the person administering did not avoid major vessels. It's a process called aspiration.
Aspiration is when the provider puts the needle in, draws back on the syringe, and waits a moment to see if blood emerges into the syringe. If so, they start over at a new injection site. This is NOT standard practice in America.
In countries where aspiration is mandatory, they haven't had a single person turn up with clots.
Why?
When they deliver the medicine directly into a vein, or into an area overly dense with capillaries, it goes straight into the major circulatory systems. The chemicals in the vaccine cause thrombocytes(platelet) to detonate and shoot out their webby guts. The webby guts normally stop bleeding, and instead, make a blood clot. The bloodclots clog up places all over the body, causing those major problems you hear of.
Further, your immune system is fighting the immune training component of the shot all over your entire body, instead of just one area. This is a lot more taxing on your organs and nerves.
When the shot is delivered properly, into an area of muscle or fat where there isn't excessive access to veins and arteries, it is a localized inflammatory response and blood clots that form in a muscle will get broken down and dissolved safely.
If the administrator doesn't know what aspirating the shot is, you need to tell the provider to stop and tell your mother than you want them to get someone else to give you the shot because the original party isn't skilled enough to be allowed to.
Sadly, just about anyone who works for a drug store or grocery store pharmacy is being allowed to administer these things. :(
So generally allowing anything but stormfront shit, up to and including Alex Jones on the platform, isn't a step towards more speech and not less?