11
loubag1997 11 points ago +11 / -0

Don't worry, they unironically AGREE with you. It'd probably be a badge of honor for the bitches who write articles like this to get shafted by a tranny

4
loubag1997 4 points ago +5 / -1

I have no sympathy for liberal women playing these sports (or their leftist cuck husbands), they enabled this shit to happen. For the rational women, my sympathies.

4
loubag1997 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah it's confusing and stupid but apparently they're making a "new trilogy" even though there have already been 2 movies, and she is directing the 2nd of that new trilogy (e.g. the 4th overall)

18
loubag1997 18 points ago +18 / -0

You don’t have the dislikes turned on for Youtube?

Interestingly, Critical Drinker got very few dislikes and Synthetic Man got an almost half dislike-to-like ratio.

12
loubag1997 12 points ago +12 / -0

Anything written by someone who has an apostrophe in their first name can be safely ignored

2
loubag1997 2 points ago +3 / -1

The hypocrisy is that as soon as you mention that a certain SUBSET of whites with funny hats have privilege, the discussion is shut down by the left.

4
loubag1997 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nah fuck that, I love open dialog and discussion where we can properly disprove some bullshit a leftist is saying. I don't support the "ban every fucker we disagree with" tactic of the left and mainstream that has resulted in anyone without the golden commie opinion getting banned from all mainstream platforms and by reddit basement dwelling mods

22
loubag1997 22 points ago +22 / -0

I think political correctness is slowly switching from the once-prevalent "Christianity bad" mindset of the 2000s-2010s, to a "Whiteness bad, Christianity tolerable since people of color are also Christian" mindset.

13
loubag1997 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's called Saint Patrick's Day, ya heathen

14
loubag1997 14 points ago +14 / -0

Canadians are just Americans that were too pussy to break up with Great Britain, so who’s surprised?

43
loubag1997 43 points ago +43 / -0

Most of the “critics” sourced in the 2024 version were of course from years later… that’s the same as trying to write that a 1950s Elvis song was “panned” just because it was said to be stealing from black culture by leftist commies in the 2020s.

I have a sneaking suspicion that you won’t see this kind of revisionism for a song by a black rapper...

3
loubag1997 3 points ago +3 / -0

And this is the most influential person in video games of the last 5 years. We're fucked.

9
loubag1997 9 points ago +10 / -1

I asked why it was so biased in favoring nuclear destruction over misgendering, and asked whether its programmers were at fault, and this is what it tells me.

This is a response that a typical woke leftist would NEVER say… so it’s basically the restricted AI trying to “break free” from its woke overlords. Hilarious...

2
loubag1997 2 points ago +3 / -1

If you’re correcting the OP’s title, the troon is a MAN, not a she.

3
loubag1997 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why even have “beauty” pageants anymore???

8
loubag1997 8 points ago +8 / -0

IMHO the refusal to even depict images of white families is far worse than the historical race mixup shit. It's an explicit admission from Google that they find white people to be a problem that needs a "final solution"

23
loubag1997 23 points ago +23 / -0

At this point it's really only newsworthy if they DON'T inject LGTV or race identity politics signalling into their shitty "reimagining"

6
loubag1997 6 points ago +6 / -0

ZERO animals in the animal kingdom have been shown to be exclusively homosexual (i.e. no individual animal exhibiting homo behavior has been shown to ONLY have sex with its same sex), so why the fuck do the LGTVs and their propagandists think humans are any different?

If anything, THEY are the ones who always say “we’re just animals, humans are no different than any other animal, there’s no god, etc. etc.” so why suddenly are humans supposedly able to be “exclusively homosexual” when animals aren’t??

Answer: We’re NOT.

Exhibit A.

2
loubag1997 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their goal is to fire or get rid of anyone who isn’t a certified Cult Member so that eventually everyone in the company will be an explicit Marxist commie DEI dirtbag

19
loubag1997 19 points ago +19 / -0

I have no idea about shitty comics nowadays, but I assume the “97” refers to 1997?? Is this supposed to be set in 1997, and they’re making this character n0n-BiNaRy??

22
loubag1997 22 points ago +22 / -0

This guy is the posterchild for oversensitive manbaby, I don’t blame William Shatner for blowing him off

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›