I've also become very sensitive to ideological indicators in general. I worry that I won't give a work a fair chance for it having, I dare say, too many black people or women. So I try to abstain from judgement lest I become actually intolerant and deprive myself from good things in bitterness.
The race variation could have worked if it was a gradient over successive generations, but from your latter examples I cannot make excuses for that game. Consider acquiring a demo next time.
Accepting a mistake would open the door for scrutiny to ALL their errors, which their position wouldn't survive. They'll double down forever, like an unrepentant SS officer at a Nuremberg trial.
Anyone doing business must have multiple avenues for payment, accounts in alternative social media for marketing, web hosting plan B's, and in the case of cons, secondary and tertiary avenues to fall back on. This is cancel-culture business: it's incompetent not to.
Yes, and that is because rationality is only there to rationalize the ideology. No such thing as truth except the present one that is aligned to the immediate goal.
These people ruin their own minds through habituation. I remember thinking once, as a kid, that lying was fine if I got away with it. Thank God for that beating my mom gave me when I stole a few coins. Crying, I told myself I hadn't done it, knowing it a lie. How horrible not to fail early when moving in the wrong direction!
Do you even realize what you're saying? You're claiming that victimization rhetoric in which one blames others instead of taking personal responsibility for oneself is compatible with Catholic social teaching. You clearly have no idea what you're typing. At this point this has to be a matter of pride. I won't reply anymore.
Can you really do this to employees? Isn't there any discrimination laws about this?