9
lapalapa 9 points ago +9 / -0

If only there was a term for that.

There's grounds for a legitimate debate between "corporate incompetence", "willful self-harm" and "woke advertisement budget."

4
lapalapa 4 points ago +4 / -0

So it's a pussy genocide?

18
lapalapa 18 points ago +18 / -0

I've never understood how women can readily take pills that affect their hormonal systems. I'd certainly never do that, even if I was okay with contraception.

Remember that the women's contraceptive pills have been proven to reduce their hypothalamus. It literally affects the brain structure permanently. Are you really going to do that to your bodies, men? It'll take decades to realize what it really does to you.

12
lapalapa 12 points ago +12 / -0

I expected some sarcastic humor. Instead I got the creepiest thing I've seen in a while. Actually gave me goosebumps.

Good find, OP.

0
lapalapa 0 points ago +1 / -1

“Nationalize” means place under state control. This, a private business, say, managing “rent” of Vatican properties, or conducting business there (tours, perhaps?), might suddenly find its assets seized by the state…

You're taking the word "nationalize" that the article's author made up as if it was fact. The Catholic Church doesn't violate the principle of private property.

3
lapalapa 3 points ago +3 / -0

She may have been acting so as to have people like us talking about her and boost her numbers.

22
lapalapa 22 points ago +22 / -0

Not only that. He's implying that he's in favor of killing people on such an arbitrary basis as intelligence. In fact, he's implying that he'd be in favor of killing people who cost the state more money than they contribute, like old people, poor people, etc.

It truly is a monstrous thing to say, as if saving some money justified murder. He clearly doesn't value human life. Not a good look for a politician. Perhaps worse of all, he didn't even realize how badly saying that would be received. That kind of idiocy would put him pretty early in the eugenics line he suggests.

by folx
11
lapalapa 11 points ago +11 / -0

We live in a society of sex.

It's not all lust. Babylon also heavily promotes pride and vanity. Greed too, although only implicitly.

3
lapalapa 3 points ago +4 / -1

Rather, they've only read Harry Potter, which they now have to hate.

1
lapalapa 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's not the point. The point is that you should post the nitter link from the beginning in the future. Statistically, most will click the main link. Twitter doesn't let people browse and many don't want to give twitter any traffic. This issue has been discussed many times.

1
lapalapa 1 point ago +2 / -1

After the buyout I could browse too for a while, but then the popup came back for me.

1
lapalapa 1 point ago +2 / -1

No one believes you.

Speak for yourself, not for everyone.

What dog do you have in this fight for you to insult me for no reason whatsoever? Exactly.

Constructive bullying is the best social corrector. Use nitter next time.

5
lapalapa 5 points ago +5 / -0

You sure? Looks like the head of a woman. If I'm wrong, that's some extreme physiognomy.

2
lapalapa 2 points ago +3 / -1

I didn't report it. You should know better than to make up accusations.

Use nitter next time: twitter doesn't let non-account holders browse. Dumbo.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›