You know what I just realized? Serf or peasant is basically a nicer word for slave.
You didn’t own the land, the king did. You would be subject to a local lord and work land that you didn’t own, by force, because you couldn’t exactly leave or refuse since you were tied to the land. You didn’t know how to read or write because you weren’t educated, etc.
People make slavery sound so bad, but I don’t see a distinction. With greater technology, people could produce excess food and then become merchants or specialize in other things. Then once we could mass produce books, learning became more feasible.
Now with technology as it is, slavery is pretty useless. That’s actually a nice story of overcoming.
It will be revolutionary. You are correct. In many ways, it eliminates the need for a court to handle economic disputes.
Imagine the token representing your car is generated at the factory at the same time as the car is created, and that you could use the token to look up the car details rather than a model number, so it could include optional upgrades, as well as the list of owners, and all service records. It would all be in the same place.
Even the key that currently controls the car could be digital and unique, and included in the token. (the keys are already digital today, but aren't used to transfer ownership) Imagine that you buy the car from the owner and he doesn't even hand you a key. The key in your pocket is suddenly authorized to operate the car due to the contract, because your key ID was included in the contract, and his key no longer works, because his authorization was revoked the minute it was transferred to you.
How can anyone even defraud you? If they don't get the money, you don't get the key. If they do get the money, your key is automatically authorized to drive the vehicle. There is no opportunity to even scam someone because the whole process is automatic and programmed before hand.
I could think of crazy things you could do with this kind of technology. For example, imagine you are a dad and you want to let your daughter borrow the car. You could authorize her key to work with it for a day or so. After she returns the car, her key stops working, so neither she nor her friends can take it out for fun when you aren't looking. :)
It will take decades to get there, but it is coming.
He does a great job explaining the fantasy that lefties live under.
Do they know better?
It's much easier to deal with programmatically, much more secure, eliminates redundancy and waste, and removes intermediaries.
An electronic signature is just a digital version of your handwritten signature. A cryptographically signed token tied to your identity is unforgeable in comparison.
Right now, you not only need PDF documents and electronic signatures, but you need to redundantly maintain systems to store that information and make it available to easily search on the internet. PDFs and images are not designed for that. Imagine that, instead of each county or state having to maintain their own systems of record, duplicating effort and data, they all use the same blockchain technology, allowing you to query them all the same way. You wouldn't even have to visit their website because the data would be available for anyone to retrieve and verify. That eliminates all the crappy websites and systems that we use, with all their differences.
Let me use examples from my own county of Greenville, SC. In order to obtain a copy of a "certified document", I have to pay $10 for a special PDF. Why? There shouldn't even be a need for a "copy". If there was one blockchain with all the data there, why would I even need a copy? I could just point to the original deed, and anyone who wanted to verify it could just look at it. If I lookup the information on my property, I get a crappy sideways scan of a PDF showing past/current owners. That is the result of using outdated technology. If I wanted a nice view of the information on record, they would have to do a separate data entry by reading the PDF and typing it into some database somewhere. Why? It could lead to typing mistakes or be out of sync with the actual record. If the record itself was digital from the beginning, there is no risk of this happening.
In order to transfer property, what do I do? I need to alter the deed by giving my signature, having two witnesses, and obtaining a court acknowledgement. Even to simply acknowledge that I have paid off my mortgage, I have to obtain a signature from a "authorized representative" and have one or more witnesses. What does that look like in a crypto world? Well I have the key that authorizes me to transfer my property token. If someone wants to buy my house, they could simply pay, and a smart contract would automatically transfer the deed to them once the funds were securely in my possession. No need for a court, or witnesses, or anything. The transfer would automatically be reflected in the public record. Some current systems warn that assessor records may not be updated for several months after a deed is recorded, although they say the web page is refreshed daily with information processed the day before. There's no need for that. It only happens because we have both physical and digital records that can be out of sync with one another.
If I pay off my mortgage, I could have the deed automatically updated and ownership transferred to me the minute the funds clear, which would take no longer than an hour or two to confirm. There's no need to involve any intermediaries or bank representatives. In a crypto world, you could even setup complex transfers in this way. For example, you could have multiple property owners for a single property, with all of their own keys required to sign off on a sale or it doesn't happen, and with the money automatically distributed according to a mutually agreed upon contract.
It's not just about records. You actually enable functionality like buying or selling once things like deeds are tokenized. The records also can't be "lost" if they are part of a public, immutable, distributed blockchain. If there were ever to be some kind of computer failure, you would setup a new computer and it could connect to the national blockchain (as long as even one computer is up and running) and restore everything. You get automatic backups for free.
I'm sure you've sold or bought things like cars before. It's always a bit tricky. Who wants to carry around thousands in cash, especially when dealing with a complete stranger? Then you have to have the title signed, which could be done incorrectly, and then you need to register your car. Afterwards the DMV will give you a temporary registration, and mail you the new title. All of that hassle could be eliminated. You could digitally buy the car, and then the title could be updated immediately. You don't need to worry about maintaining or protecting the title yourself.
We are looking at a whole new world when the technology gets there. Law firms will need programmers who specialize in digital contracts. It'll be interesting.
Exactly this. NFTs only work as digital title, and only when there's some enforcement mechanism of that title.
For example, you could use NFTs with cars and boats and houses, but the government has no interest in handing over exclusivity of that role.
True, but it would be genius if it was adopted. Imagine handling payment through a digital contract. Both sides agree, and bam, money and title changes hands. There is nothing to dispute. As you said, it doesn't mean anything unless it is adopted by the legal system so that you have a third party enforcement mechanism.
You could extend it to property, legal titles. The main difference between that and the paper titles we use now is that it would be simpler to transfer ownership, cheaper to store and manage, and much more tamper proof.
The challenge is mostly acceptance from people as legitimate. It would have to be adopted by the legal system.
Maybe someone can translate into boomer how verifying ownership of digital property matters outside of a specific walled garden.
It matters as much as ownership of any collectible matters, which is not at all except to the people doing the collecting. Try explaining how people pay money for unique skins/models in games. It's all digital and meaningless but it gives people joy somehow so they do it.
Or how digital goods can in any way be considered to be "unique".
Because the nature of digital content is that it can be infinitely and perfectly copied at effectively zero cost.
Not NFTs. Not Bitcoin either. They are protected and kept unique through cryptography and the blockchain (a distributed ledger). That is the innovation behind Bitcoin that makes it special. Prior to its creation, nobody knew how to prevent the double spend problem, which is basically me sending the same digital value to multiple people precisely because digital goods are easy to copy.
Exactly. Aren't all crimes the result of hatred? I mean how else could you attack another person unless you had hatred in your heart? God's ways are simple. It's Satan's ways that are complicated.
People are assuming good intentions for some reason.
Yes but no out-group bias could exist without the participation of the race in question. Blaming outsiders doesn't make sense to me. If the race is strong and has faith, it would never consider adopting this attitude.
To me, the white race is currently very pathetically weak and needs to admit the problem is internal in order to fix it. Blaming outsiders like you're a victim will perpetuate the problem.
I don't know why you are downvoted. Whites are and have been the majority. It literally could not have happened without their willing participation.
Racism as a term didn't even exist until the 20th century. You will not find it in older texts. It was always intended to promote victimhood, the Jews just updated the definition to better serve their purposes today.
If you think about it, does it matter the reason you hate? Hatred is wrong and evil. Do I really need all these words to describe various forms of hatred, which only differ based on immutable physical characteristics? Misogyny, able..ableism (?), ageism, homophobia, anti-semitism, etc... All I am doing is creating categories that mentally weak people can latch on to as an excuse for why their lives aren't going well. Hatred is hatred. There is no reason to dress it up as special just because it is directed at a particular group of people.
Notice that there is no word for Christian hatred, no word for straight hatred, no word for white hatred (racism could have been used this way, hence the change). I'm surprised misandry exists, but it's only a matter of time to totally invalidate that one.
I just meant that I don’t go around harassing them but some of them think that I’m hurting them by not applauding them
In a way, you are. Deep down they know there’s something not right about it, and a common thread for evil is that it’s not enough for you to allow it to exist. You must be made to praise it as the good, because even a flicker of the truth can wipe it out instantly.
The good and normal are content to exist without the validation of others. Reality just is. Fantasy needs constant reinforcement to prevent reality from intruding.
Tiered society. Covid compliance was meant to be their form of social credit score, but the implementation seems off. I think they are afraid not enough will comply willingly.
she encouraged her nice-guy ex-husband to "talk publicly about his fears" and he committed suicide
It used to be common knowledge that a man doesn't talk about or even acknowledge fears publicly, and you never listen to women, that's nuts. Too bad he didn't have any solid male friends to help him out.
I'm not sure "trans" is really ever a natural condition, but I'm positive that even if it was the abuse it promotes does far more damage to more people than anyone it theoretically helps.
It never is. Neither is being gay. They are mental illnesses promoted by Satan. The difference is that in the past it might have been isolated to a few individuals in a village somewhere, or maybe accepted and praised within a particular society, but now with social media, mental illness can spread and infect people worldwide.
That's the challenge we are dealing with in the modern day. Not only are lies promoted, but truth is silenced and labeled as a form of hatred lol. I don't hate trans, I just cannot go along with the lies they promote.
It's easier to pretend when it's all in your head, lol.
They do leak them, but I think it's like a form of bitching/gossip to create negative perception of the person. It's the typical passive-aggressive response of a woman.
I think the difference is most of these people that turn nuts always wanted to be liked, accepted, or something of that nature. Perhaps extroverts too. The tranny lobby grabs on to that and doesn't let go. Feed them full of attention while explaining away their weirdness into all their faggotry. I'm glad for myself I was the introverted type who just wanted everyone to let me be.
I read about the Nevo girl OP mentions. Quite interesting really:
When I identified as a woman, I was often called "sweetheart", "darling" and "honey". I never liked those labels. They created a power imbalance where the person calling me that was asserting some kind of dominance over me.
I was no one's "sweetheart". I think this feeds the societal expectation that women should be polite, quiet and lovely – a sweetheart. I come from a long line of loud and not particularly polite women, and I'm proud of that.
So at least for the women trying to become men, it seems one of the reasons is they simply don't like what being a woman means. (getting lots of attention, being seen as sexual and weaker) Makes sense that she would have a loud overbearing Jewish mother too, the "strong wahman" type.
Ironically I think the men trying to become women are doing it to get the advantages of that sex. Not having to be as responsible, strong, or logical, and having your failures/mistakes excused.
I get it now. It's dumb to think you can change your own nature with chemicals, but if you reject your own nature, I can see why you would try.
We need all kinds. :)
That's what all cult members do. It's what all pyramid schemes tell their members to do. Did you see my post about the largest crypto scam in history? OneCoin told their buyers that people who didn't believe in OneCoin, even friends and family, were not to be trusted, they just don't understand crypto. Sounds like the trans ideology, doesn't it.
LOL. Identical. That's actually worse though. At least the issue of whether you are a man or woman and what that means is an important part of your identity. Crypto is just money. Who cares enough to join a money cult?
Deep down, I think it is just a pyramid scheme, created out of hatred for men by radical feminists - but who's at the top, and what's their equivalent of money?
Most cryptocurrencies are not valuable, or are too complex to easily determine their value. Bitcoin is the exception. People always talk about "who" invented it, what a mystery, must be nefarious, but that is totally irrelevant. You can read the Bitcoin whitepaper here. It's only 9 pages, and explains the system in a way that even a teenager can understand. There have been many improvements since then, but the basic functionality has stayed the same this whole time.
To me it's like asking someone who invented the car or refrigerator? Neat historical fact, but as long as it works, what do I care? I can read and understand the code (I am a programmer) and the system is brilliant. The only issue is that it functions more like gold, in that, because of the limited number of total transactions, the fees per transaction will increase in proportion to the number of people using it. (basic supply and demand problem) The total number of transactions are limited due to the decentralized nature of the system. You can't change that because that's what makes it resilient and tamper proof, but you can add a second layer network on top to facilitate cheap, tiny transfers of value like what you would need to buy coffee.
Once that issue is solved, Bitcoin will be ready and likely widely adopted. The reality is that we need a replacement for money that can't be tampered with by the government, and Bitcoin has all the properties of such a thing. Other cryptos (like Ethereum) have different purposes, and are not deflationary like Bitcoin (it has the 21 million limit on circulation, while Ethereum is purposefully inflationary).
I actually think other cryptos will be useful for replacing the financial stuff people do today (stocks) with a more efficient system, but none of them are suitable for money like Bitcoin is. The use case matters because otherwise you have to go through the gatekeepers, and you get the bullshit treatment that companies like Robinhood give you where they will literally freeze your trades to support their masters.
If you start your own country, the UN will bug you to have a minister for women. I'll put my name forward.
Accepted. :)
Yeah I did actually. The transformation is pretty damn shocking. Not sure what age she was in the original picture, but she didn't look awful then.
She claims to be Jewish, and that she started "transitioning" in Israel. I say I'm not surprised because Jewish mothers are overbearing monsters from what I hear, so breaking from the pressure is a possibility.
Edit: Seems that I am correct,
When I identified as a woman, I was often called "sweetheart", "darling" and "honey". I never liked those labels. They created a power imbalance where the person calling me that was asserting some kind of dominance over me.
I was no one's "sweetheart". I think this feeds the societal expectation that women should be polite, quiet and lovely – a sweetheart. I come from a long line of loud and not particularly polite women, and I'm proud of that.
She apparently "transitioned" because she did not like the idea of men having power over her. She doesn't accept that this is the order of God and the way things are meant to be, so of course once Satan gets a hold of her mind, it's all over.
After my transition, my mum even asserted that now I was the man of the house, I would have to do some heavy lifting. I went from one rigid gender box to another, but this one had more space.
Gross....
The name is apparently popular in Israel. It's a Canaanite name.
"Most Israelis have become 'Canaanites' without realizing it. Some of the most popular names in Israel, such as Anat and Nevo, are names of Canaanite gods. Names such as Osnat, Hagar and Nimrod are Old Testament names that are attached to non-Jewish, pagan traditions. These names were never used by Jews until they came into fashion in Israel in the 1950s. "Adam, the best-known name in the Old Testament, was never used by Jews because it represents a non-Jewish person. But in Israel it became common as a boys' name."
I was the only person they thought would take the transphobia bullshit and tell them all to go to hell, while her friends were cowards afraid of getting cancelled and her co-workers and roommates were enablers and pushers.
Pathetic. They call you over from another country to do what they won’t? I wouldn’t go either.
Rule #1 of being a man: Never, ever, for no reason whatsoever, follow a woman. Not if she is your girlfriend, wife, and especially not a stranger.
You did good.
Her family is from a country people here would consider based. Proof that being on the correct side is not born into them, but a product of being in those countries. They don't know she's done it.
Makes sense. From what I understand, these trans converts tend to dump all their previous connections in order to prevent disagreement with their choice.
It’s a lot easier when your family is in a completely different country and doesn’t even know. What a clown world.
If it gets much worse, I’m going to start my own country…
He’s right, we are dangerous.
Of course! What a stupid woman. Your daughter is being a whore for likes, but she’s real creative at it!