1
horstshort 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know. Starfield doesn't really have space gameplay either. But all three games want to be space exploration games so they're somewhat comparable.

2
horstshort 2 points ago +2 / -0

You misunderstood me. I was only referring to the gameplay. Not the visuals. Both for Starfield and Freelancer.

2
horstshort 2 points ago +2 / -0

Especially Ariana Grande looks like a robot. Like there is absolute nothing going on in her head. It's really uncanny. She's got to be on drugs or she is seriously fucked up. Probably both.

4
horstshort 4 points ago +4 / -0

Visually yes but the gameplay seems be pretty underwhelming too. Compared to Starfield it doesn't look bad but Starfield is shit. Compared with the 21 year old Freelancer it doesn't look good.

4
horstshort 4 points ago +4 / -0

I click on the first video and they're crying before the interview has even begun. It feels like they're NPCs straight out of Oblivion. Are they drugged out of their minds or what the hell is going on?

6
horstshort 6 points ago +6 / -0

Honestly I get the impression Spacebourne 2 only looks decent because nowadays the average AAA game is so incredibly bad.

3
horstshort 3 points ago +4 / -1

That's rich coming from you. Wait... I think hear something... HIAS?

Anyway I'm not going to bother to list every single author and work that has absolutely nothing to do with National Socialism contained in that list as that would takes days if not weeks or months.

6
horstshort 6 points ago +7 / -1

No book names.

A1 are banned authors

A2 are banned books

A3 are banned publishers

Put a bit of effort into the role you're playing.

4
horstshort 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, and it's the former. That's the obfuscation you are engaging in. It's the same way that Kristallnacht was directly ordered by the party, which then claimed it was a just a popular reaction.

Probably slightly more nuanced than that but I'll leave you be.

Yes, that's why they went around burning books.

Guess everyone involved in WW2 was leftist then.

8
horstshort 8 points ago +9 / -1

Who is obfuscating the fact that those students were National Socialists? No one.

But there is a difference between an event organised/ordered by the government/party leadership from beginning to end and party members or people affiliated or sympathetic towards an ideology organising it from their own accord. Students aren't exactly known for not being politically outspoken.

Being a liar, no different from OP, you are trying to obfuscate the fact that National Socialists, including the government, were explicitly involved in every aspect of the event.

Yes, I am definitely trying to obfuscate the fact that the NSDAP government banned those books in the first place. :')

The same way that modern socialists pretend that "Palestinian Protests" are purely grass-roots outrage of the student population, and not a major propaganda effort by Leftist organizations operating at every level.

Considering that the absolute majority of the student population and student organisations are leftist, it's not exactly surprising.

12
horstshort 12 points ago +13 / -1

How is it lying that students did it? You yourself wrote that the students asked for a list from the ministry. So it was an event primarliy organised by the students. OP did not state National Socialists weren't involved in that event. At least not in this post.

But that students burned "left wing" books is an oversimplification and depending on the intentions either ignorant or dishonest. On that point I agree with you.

2
horstshort 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, the already woke elements were turned up to 11 and the story turned into a stupid, non sensical world saving plot. The design changes of Vi were especially glaring. While she at least still looked like a muscular woman in S1 in S2 she's basically a man. Also Sevika got one of those idiotic ugly as fuck feminist haircuts. Overall the character designs got worse. And don't get me started on that idiotic dragged out lesbian sex scene.

16
horstshort 16 points ago +17 / -1

The books that were destroyed were almost entirely Nazi propaganda or apologetics.

And that makes it okay? Ignoring the fact that the definition of "Nazi propaganda" is very ambigious.

The books that were burned were typically not done in large elaborate displays except by the French and Soviets (...)

So they did burn books. So why are you calling him a liar if you're just confirming his statement?

In reality, this was hardly any of the books. Most of the books were about anti-war advocacy, support for the Weimar republic, and support for other variants of Socialism.

So when they burn/ban books that they consider propaganda it's bad but when we do it it's okay?

2
horstshort 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well S2 was very much a disappointment. In every aspect except the visuals.

-1
horstshort -1 points ago +1 / -2

How is asking for clarification arguing semantics? Precise language is the key in understanding. Believing strongly in something has nothing to do with how imaginative or creative you are. It doesn't matter how 'logical' a belief is.

view more: Next ›