A good sleeper cell won't have done anything illegal yet. Ideally they should be here legally and have jobs and be 'upstanding'.
"A lot of people came in through Biden with his stupid open border, but we know where most of them are: We've got our eye on all of them, I think"
"Most of them... all of them I think" sounds to me more like they have no idea.
In any case I think we can expect at least some domestic terrorism, whether it's false flag or not. Unless surveillance state is really all-seeing.
But Israel certainly wants to take credit for it because then everybody says "don't say anything bad about the Jews or you'll get Kirked".
They make themselves look super sus, with Netanyahoo saying "guys it definitely wasn't us double swear wink wink" but nobody will be able to actually prove anything.
It's win-win for them. They make people fear speaking against them and make the fiercest anti-Israel opponents look like chumps.
My point is it's creatively bankrupt. The feds wear blue gloves, what else do you know about them?
In contrast to something like Farscape that for sure has weird muppets but at least they tried for something original.
That's what the Hegseths are trying to do by provoking a confrontation now instead of later when it's too late.
Honestly I'm starting to question whether Gen Z can even read. You wouldn't have these dumb questions if you actually read my initial comment instead of seeing red.
If the choice is confront Muslims invading our countries now vs later.
Do you choose later?
edit: notice how none of you can answer this question? Because you would choose later and you know that's retarded so you don't want to put your name on it.
An honest answer is, "yeah it'd be better to confront that problem right now but I don't think that'll happen" but "that's not going to happen" is a dodge so that you don't have to agree with what I said. You know what I said makes sense, but you have some weird ideology preventing you from admitting that.
He says ~40m there's a bunch of Muslims in US and EU so in the Muslim vs Christian proxy war (on behalf of Jews) we're going to suffer.
Tucker's like why would they want to provoke a global religious war, why purposely martyr the supreme leader? Well, probably the Hegseths are thinking because it's going to happen, now or later.
And it's going to be worse later. If we don't confront the anti-Western forces building up within the West then we're over. Tucker actually convinced me to support this "stupid" war.
I'll have to check it out in a year or so.
Can't imagine open programs can resize for DPI in X11, maybe in Wayland.
Mac recently got hardware remote desktop, I think the holdup was UI scaling since they couldn't even get that working ok between multiple monitors with different DPI.
Is it using hardware codecs? If not then it's useless.
On Windows I remote into my desktop from a laptop and get 60+ fps full screen even with a 10 year old Intel-graphics laptop that was $200 at the time. Every window open and DPI adjusted for the laptop.
Seconded on Mint. Only actual distro that doesn't look like garbage.
(modern) Gnome UI is actually retarded for a desktop/laptop and KDE still looks chintzy.
I went with the other choice, Windows 10 IoT 2022 edition that has support until 2032 and none of the ads or AI. Massgrave (github.com/massgravel) to permanently activate it. Mostly because remote desktop is dog shit in linux.
Is your IQ under 25? So someone who says "no stupid wars" can't ever start a stupid war, because by definition, if he started it, it won't be a stupid war? So the statement is completely meaningless?
Oh my god, the irony of somebody with no concept of theory of mind calling somebody else dumb.
Too funny.
You're proving my point here. You think posting a few no-context clips is "backing up" what you said.
Because that's what you consider is evidence, that's where you're getting your ideas from.
"No stupid wars" isn't my standard it's Trump's. Trump I doubt thinks this is a stupid war or wouldn't have done it. It's like you think you're here arguing with Trump; I'm not Trump btw.
Older AIs are like the Plinko game from The Price Is Right.
You drop the input piece down from the top and it usually ends up in a bucket near where you dropped it, but sometimes chaos makes it goes across to the whole other side. You give it a picture of a tree and by adding the right initial condition noise to make the plinko go off track make it say it's a cat or anything else.
LLMs are the same except they have 'attention' that groups parts of the input together first, so it's harder to have input that makes the plinko go way off. It doesn't just see words like "correct" "wrong" "answer", but "correct answer" and "wrong answer" as different things.
The bucket with the grand prize answer in it is bigger in LLM, but still sometimes just the way you phrased the input or some extraneous detail sends the plinko off into some crazy answer bucket. They also don't have side walls so if the plinko goes off the side the answer won't even be from training data but extrapolated and completely made up.