He says ~40m there's a bunch of Muslims in US and EU so in the Muslim vs Christian proxy war (on behalf of Jews) we're going to suffer.
Tucker's like why would they want to provoke a global religious war, why purposely martyr the supreme leader? Well, probably the Hegseths are thinking because it's going to happen, now or later.
And it's going to be worse later. If we don't confront the anti-Western forces building up within the West then we're over. Tucker actually convinced me to support this "stupid" war.
If the choice is confront Muslims invading our countries now vs later.
Do you choose later?
edit: notice how none of you can answer this question? Because you would choose later and you know that's retarded so you don't want to put your name on it.
An honest answer is, "yeah it'd be better to confront that problem right now but I don't think that'll happen" but "that's not going to happen" is a dodge so that you don't have to agree with what I said. You know what I said makes sense, but you have some weird ideology preventing you from admitting that.
So, why didn't they deport the ragheads and shut down the NGOs that keep importing them before dropping bombs on their inbred cousins? Clearly, they want more terrorism so they'll have an excuse to increase domestic spying.
So, it's alright for terrorist cells to infiltrate the country as long as they do it legally? Who gives a fuck if they're legal or illegal, they all have to go back.
That's what the Hegseths are trying to do by provoking a confrontation now instead of later when it's too late.
Honestly I'm starting to question whether Gen Z can even read. You wouldn't have these dumb questions if you actually read my initial comment instead of seeing red.
He says ~40m there's a bunch of Muslims in US and EU so in the Muslim vs Christian proxy war (on behalf of Jews) we're going to suffer.
Tucker's like why would they want to provoke a global religious war, why purposely martyr the supreme leader? Well, probably the Hegseths are thinking because it's going to happen, now or later.
And it's going to be worse later. If we don't confront the anti-Western forces building up within the West then we're over. Tucker actually convinced me to support this "stupid" war.
wut
If the choice is confront Muslims invading our countries now vs later.
Do you choose later?
edit: notice how none of you can answer this question? Because you would choose later and you know that's retarded so you don't want to put your name on it.
An honest answer is, "yeah it'd be better to confront that problem right now but I don't think that'll happen" but "that's not going to happen" is a dodge so that you don't have to agree with what I said. You know what I said makes sense, but you have some weird ideology preventing you from admitting that.
Nothing about this is going to lead to confronting Muslims in our countries. If anything, we'll get even more of them let in as refugees.
I'm responding to the point Tucker was making, which is that we're going to have tons of domestic problems because of all the Muslims we have.
But nice dodge.
post nose rabbi
Yeah, everyone you disagree with over knocking the shithead mullahs out of power in Iran is a jew.
Fuck Israel, fuck Islam.
So, why didn't they deport the ragheads and shut down the NGOs that keep importing them before dropping bombs on their inbred cousins? Clearly, they want more terrorism so they'll have an excuse to increase domestic spying.
Border and raghead immigration is shut down and most of the Muslims are here legally, like the ones setting up sharia zones in Texas.
Duh. Any other dumb questions?
So, it's alright for terrorist cells to infiltrate the country as long as they do it legally? Who gives a fuck if they're legal or illegal, they all have to go back.
That's what the Hegseths are trying to do by provoking a confrontation now instead of later when it's too late.
Honestly I'm starting to question whether Gen Z can even read. You wouldn't have these dumb questions if you actually read my initial comment instead of seeing red.