Is it using hardware codecs? If not then it's useless.
On Windows I remote into my desktop from a laptop and get 60+ fps full screen even with a 10 year old Intel-graphics laptop that was $200 at the time. Every window open and DPI adjusted for the laptop.
Can't imagine open programs can resize for DPI in X11, maybe in Wayland.
Mac recently got hardware remote desktop, I think the holdup was UI scaling since they couldn't even get that working ok between multiple monitors with different DPI.
Mint is a somewhat conservative distro, which is part of why I went with it, but there are many distros that have aggressively embraced wayland already and honestly even a year from now I'd probably say pick one of those over Mint because it is going to be behind the curve on a newer component like that for quite some time.
Is it using hardware codecs? If not then it's useless.
On Windows I remote into my desktop from a laptop and get 60+ fps full screen even with a 10 year old Intel-graphics laptop that was $200 at the time. Every window open and DPI adjusted for the laptop.
Yes to hardware encoding, but only on wayland. I'm still on Mint 22.1, so no wayland, and no hardware acceleration for me with Remmina.
I'll have to check it out in a year or so.
Can't imagine open programs can resize for DPI in X11, maybe in Wayland.
Mac recently got hardware remote desktop, I think the holdup was UI scaling since they couldn't even get that working ok between multiple monitors with different DPI.
X11 is historical cruft that is holding back the Linux desktop
Mint is a somewhat conservative distro, which is part of why I went with it, but there are many distros that have aggressively embraced wayland already and honestly even a year from now I'd probably say pick one of those over Mint because it is going to be behind the curve on a newer component like that for quite some time.