1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it's he said/she said

If it is, the presumption of innocence applies.

Women have no credibility, and have proven time and again that they will weaponize the state against anyone for any reason.

Good thing men never did that.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Glad you cleared that up. The court found that the women were asleep or incapacitated. That clearly makes it not rape. Also, the mom is involved with Jeffrey Epstein, and literally asked his advice on how to raise kids, so yeah...

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rest assured, my country isn't overrun by murderers because I'm willing to give people arsenic.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jewish? What? You're saying that because of his name?

Anyway, I was mocking the media for labeling him white (even though he's clearly not) as soon as they could blame whitey for a fake crime.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd probably argue back a bit that most American stadiums don't even have the facility available for everyone there to neatly dispose of their trash

So the Japanese feel right at home.

8
AntonioOfVenice 8 points ago +8 / -0

For them, this is not being respectful, it's just being normal. It's no wonder that Japan is so clean.

19
AntonioOfVenice 19 points ago +19 / -0

Don't call the police if you're being robbed by a black guy, sit down and take it, but a black guy killing someone is a perfectly reasonable response to allegedly being touched and merely reflects 'having boundaries'. Of course, she also brings up Trayvon Martin. So Zimmerman, the white Hispanic, is supposed to NOT have the boundary of "not having his head smashed into the pavement", but a black guy can stab you because of his "boundary" of a white guy (allegdly) touching him to say that he's in the wrong tent. What if non-blacks had these same "boundaries"? If they started killing people for something as innocuous as "this is not your tent", and I'm not saying they should, how many blacks would remain alive?

Black boys are afraid around white people, says this article. Pretty sure it's a lie, but if it were true, then they're very stupid, because they should be afraid of fellow black guys.

Oh, and if you think this is bad... this has thousands of likes. I thought people were exaggerating the support for this killer.

26
AntonioOfVenice 26 points ago +26 / -0

I don't generally support this sort of thing, but Leo Terrell should unironically be unhireable. What is his talent exactly? Being a house nigger for the man? Piss off man.

Also, did he say work with a Jew or work under a Jew. Major difference.

12
AntonioOfVenice 12 points ago +12 / -0

I see it's another "teen".

And unironically, yes. Don't risk your life for someone else's health. I'd give this guy anything he asked for, cigarettes, fentanyl, arsenic.

36
AntonioOfVenice 36 points ago +36 / -0

The guy said that Jews will try to ruin your life. And then they did. It's the equivalent of Muslims threatening you when you say that Muslims are violent. "CALL ME VIOLENT, I KILL YOU!"

Also, his argument doesn't make much sense. He says that he doesn't mind people thinking this, only people expressing it. So you mind honesty? Wouldn't you want people to express such views so that they can be challenged? You could have acted cool and understanding, and the guy probably would have gone away thinking "hey, maybe I was too quick to make sweeping judgments based on some bad experiences".

I did see that this guy was criticized by a Palantir goon for not doxxing the guy. Maybe he tried to do it with more plausible deniability, I don't know.

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +4 / -0

Interesting post and interesting perspective. You may be right, and I actually did expect many people here to hold this perspective. For myself, and I encounter mostly blacks in Europe, this is a pretty infallible guide to who is dangerous and who's not - not even the suit, but you can see them from a mile away. Blacks who are slouching and stay in one place = stay away. Blacks who are relatively well-dressed, groomed, stand upright, are doing work = generally harmless.

Said that they need to back their own, because the white people are against them.

Interesting how often victimhood, real or fake, is used to become perpetrators against another group.

And thus I'm still never not on edge around blacks.

I have the distinct impression that attitudes among American blacks are markedly worse than blacks elsewhere. Except maybe Japan, speaking of the "world theme park".

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, if people can't see immigrants beheading natives, that solves the problem, doesn't it?

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Note the wording. One is an 'incident', the other is 'attack'. You just know which is the one where white people did it.

Also, he's misspelling his favorite word, but that's like criticizing the deck-chairs on the Titanic.

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wonder how many people who are 'on edge around black people' are so when it's a well-groomed black guy in a suit vs. someone who has his pants hanging below his ankles and slouching like hell.

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is this a skit? Why would someone put this on his own Instagram page?

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The argument doesn't make much sense because as far as I know, many fewer child molesters get caught compared to murderers.

If the punishment is the same, you'd still rather want a 10% than a 60% chance.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Zeroing in on an easily-undersrood typo is a massive red flag for bad faith...

Not easily understood by me. What was it supposed to be? Gangouts? Like a chimpout but for a gang?

Read it again, it now seems pretty obvious from the context that you meant handouts.

If you're good enough to have a certain job, then you'll be given an even better one.

You could make the argument that this bids up the price of black labor.

And it doesn't matter if anyone thinks you aren't qualified because it's literally illegal to discriminate against you

Thinking someone isn't qualified is only discrimination in the woke way. But you're not wrong that civil rights law is woke at heart, especially in America. If you can't give colorblind tests to people because blacks score poorly, then you're not allowed to discriminate against the unqualified.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I haven't heard of her, but at least "Mia" is a real name even if you spell it ridiculously.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's hangouts?

Maybe some do. Any black who earned his job is going to be resentful of blacks who got preferentially hired for some diversity quota, as everyone's going to think that he's not qualified.

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +4 / -0

They might take a knee for his murderer aka victim of systemic racism.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

I noticed that quite a few people who really hate neocons left. Onephilosoraptor if you remember him, and Kienan both fall in that camp.

As for me, I got serious "are we the baddies" vibes when the "NO NEW WARS" supposed anti-interventionist right cheered blood for oil and new wars for Israel.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›